Amaroq -> RE: Question for 2006 Alpha-Beta Testers (4/27/2006 8:53:35 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin I'm just curious about how leagues are working using REAL players with the Lahman database. Anyone doing that? I'm normally a Lahman guy, I usually start in 1901 and work forward. However, I've been looking at fictional players at the moment; I'll shift over shortly. quote:
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin How's the multiple levels of minors working out? I'm not deep enough into a career to have a feeling for it - I've been focused on testing in-game management. quote:
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin A stupid question here -- does turning OFF team financials automatically invoke the reserve clause? Yes, I think that's in PS_2005. quote:
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin How about dealing players for cash, then? Shaun? You gonna put this in? That doesn't actually 'make sense' in the financial model he's got going. Instead of having a bank balance, and making or losing money, teams have a 'budget'. What would it mean if I traded somebody for $1M? Is it a permanent bump to my budget? Is it a temporary, one-year bump to my budget? Or do we have to introduce a 'bank account', place the money there, and deal with code like 'if the wage bill exceeds the budget, deduct it from the bank account'.. and 'pro-rate that if a player is traded mid-season'... [:)] Its not a simple item, and I'd expect to see trading draft picks earlier. quote:
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin Am I gonna be able to recreate the historical majors as they existed pre-free agency? I couldn't say. We're getting closer and closer every release, I feel, but there's still a long way to go. quote:
ORIGINAL: KG Erwin If it ISN'T possible, I'm not gonna piss and moan about it. I have a specific goal in mind, but I'll go with what I'm given. I'd say post, this forum or via e-mail to Shaun, exactly what you want to see in detail. If you don't ask for it, it won't happen! It sounds like you have a detailed idea of what you want, which, if its any good, I'd back. [:)] (I searched your posts back through October 2005, to see if you had, and didn't spot anything; if I missed it, or its older than that, it might be worth bumping/re-posting.)
|
|
|
|