Charles2222 -> RE: War In The Pacific Updated to v1.801 (5/19/2006 8:38:33 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kapten Q quote:
ORIGINAL: Charles_22 quote:
ORIGINAL: veji1 hey... This disband at national base can lead to exploits... Disband all the Floatplanes and transports, even all the bombers later in the war ( as JApan how can you use them anyway..) into the pool and then use it for fighter datais... I am not sure this is good... had we have pools per type of plane ( fighter IN pool, LB IJN pool, FP IJN pool ), this would be great, but otherwise it is potentially source of gameyness : put your green pilots in bomber squadrons, do the transport thing, and then put them in the pool, and again... On the surface level that sure looks like a major hole. It's a good idea to get rid of some of those useless depleted groups anyway. I'm not too sure about this aspect in the PTO, but in the ETO at least, during the Battle of Britain, the RAF took a lot of bomber crews and put them into fighters, so it's not entirely without historical precedence. The Germans did it as well, put bomber pilots in to single engine night fighter in 43-44. They were experienced and had actually got traning in instrumental navigation, a useful skill at night! There were no time for this skill in the german pilot replecement program during the late war. But I must say I dont quite understand this namned pilot list thing. Can you select and assign individual pilots to daitais? Q Thank you. I hadn't heard of the Gerrys doing it, but it's none too surprising when you consider they put a lot of their surface ship crews into the submarine program too. My interpretation of the named pilot thing is that those pilots will emerge somewhere or other after 60 days. I was thinking they would be relegated to the same type of airplane but I'm not entirely sure about that. I don't think there's any way they made these pilots completely controllable and assigned at any time. The only real pilot control I see going with this edition is that you can assign pilots in one lump instead of one-at-a-time if you want (saves a few keystrokes). Oh, sorry, I see the designers explained this better, though I was somewhat wrong here.
|
|
|
|