RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns



Message

Zap -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/1/2007 11:14:06 PM)

I would like to take a look at that bathroom I'll bet you its nice.[:D]



Alby -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 1:11:09 AM)

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..
[;)]




Mau Fox -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 1:57:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Matti Kuokkanen

If there are 10 groups of infantry with average number of 10 per group, only one of them will succeed by even damaging tank! And before said 10 infantry groups get even shot at it, tank has killed, suppressed and routed many other infantry groups. So one infantry company isn't going to take out tank company. Even with sufficient amount of infantry running towards tanks shouting URAA might not be good idea either, not without decent antitank weapons.

On the other hand, manual seems to be older than newest version of game and thus this information may be outdated. If this is case, what is % used right now?


Matti Kuokkanen, you could be very surprised and scared to learn how much damage a half platoon of bare infantry men can do to ANY tank BEFORE getting at close range assults ... [;)]

There are so MANY ways to play this game other than levelling the battlefield with dozens and dozens of iron toys. Believe me it is even funnier than that.

Of course no one with a healthy mind would face up a company of tanks with a company of infantry without adequate AT support.
But this is written in EVERY battle manuals. Even the real ones. [;)]

Mau Fox. [sm=00000436.gif]



tracer -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 3:19:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy

Hey...should I be considering myself part of the "Old Crowd"? [:D]

I know from previous conversations here a while back that I am considered part of the "Old Guard" which should not to be confused with the "Very Old Guard" but, in turn, is not be confused with the "Young Guard", who I guess don't have the same perks and priviledges as either of the "Older Guards"...ie their own private keys to the executive bathrooms. [:D] [:'(]


...now if only you could remember to use Right Guard [:'(]



FlashfyreSP -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 3:35:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy

Hey...should I be considering myself part of the "Old Crowd"? [:D]

I know from previous conversations here a while back that I am considered part of the "Old Guard" which should not to be confused with the "Very Old Guard" but, in turn, is not be confused with the "Young Guard", who I guess don't have the same perks and priviledges as either of the "Older Guards"...ie their own private keys to the executive bathrooms. [:D] [:'(]


...now if only you could remember to use Right Guard [:'(]


Left Guard is a better position; fewer running plays to that side of the line.
[sm=00000924.gif]



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 3:51:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap

I would like to take a look at that bathroom I'll bet you its nice.[:D]



It's really is very nice...except if you go in there behind Tracer after one of his lunch time visits to Taco-Bell! [X(]



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 3:54:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer
...now if only you could remember to use Right Guard [:'(]


I use Arrid...[:'(]

An Orzel can, however, be considered Avant-Garde. [:D]

(notice cheap rip off of Goblin tag line method)



tracer -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:27:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..
[;)]


IIRC, this place opened in 3/2000; before then the 'SP crowd' hung out at the Raiders forum (and I'm pretty sure I used to see your name there).


Hmmm...I just noticed that they no longer display your 'member-#' here. At one time each person's member-number appeared beneath their 'joined'-date, and since they were sequential a 2- or 3-digit member-# meant 'old-timer' ('course back then that could mean they pre-dated you by a couple months!).



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:32:09 AM)

So that would make you guys part of the "Very Old Fart Guard"? [:'(]



tracer -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:35:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap

I would like to take a look at that bathroom I'll bet you its nice.[:D]



It's really is very nice...except if you go in there behind Tracer after one of his lunch time visits to Taco-Bell! [X(]


So no one bought my "it was the dog" alibi? [&:]



[sm=Crazy-1271.gif]



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:51:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer
So no one bought my "it was the dog" alibi? [&:]


Umm...there has to be a dog in the bathroom before you can blame it on one Tracer.



Alby -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:54:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..
[;)]


IIRC, this place opened in 3/2000; before then the 'SP crowd' hung out at the Raiders forum (and I'm pretty sure I used to see your name there).


Hmmm...I just noticed that they no longer display your 'member-#' here. At one time each person's member-number appeared beneath their 'joined'-date, and since they were sequential a 2- or 3-digit member-# meant 'old-timer' ('course back then that could mean they pre-dated you by a couple months!).

Well I came along in 4/2000 so....
I was an early one..
[:)]



Alby -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:55:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orzel Bialy

So that would make you guys part of the "Very Old Fart Guard"? [:'(]

THIS never gets old...
[image]local://upfiles/132/B7289F6F171C4BDCA9CFEFBF207FDEBB.gif[/image]

[:D]



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 5:04:15 AM)

[image]http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfiles/132/B7289F6F171C4BDCA9CFEFBF207FDEBB.gif[/image]

You're right...it's timeless!



Alby -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 5:08:53 AM)

[sm=00000976.gif]
[sm=00000945.gif]



Goblin -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:12:20 AM)

[sm=00000968.gif]



Bernie -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:56:32 AM)

[image]http://spwaw.com/phpBB2/images/smiles/sign_hijack.gif[/image]



Goblin -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 7:22:51 AM)

[sm=00000976.gif]



Goblin -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:02:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

I joined in 2000
I think I am part of the VERY old crowd..
[;)]


IIRC, this place opened in 3/2000; before then the 'SP crowd' hung out at the Raiders forum (and I'm pretty sure I used to see your name there).


Hmmm...I just noticed that they no longer display your 'member-#' here. At one time each person's member-number appeared beneath their 'joined'-date, and since they were sequential a 2- or 3-digit member-# meant 'old-timer' ('course back then that could mean they pre-dated you by a couple months!).


This forum wasn't on the map until Bernie, me, Flash, and Ken got here. Loser.[:'(]



Goblin - A Goblin says the '02 crew RuL3s[8D]



Alby -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 4:39:09 PM)

IIRC, 02 was known as "The year of the Locked threads"
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]



robot -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 5:03:27 PM)

Ill tell you I think your all a bunch of twits if you take offense at a simple statement such as the one gunny made. I sit here and read where this are that one is offended by what seems to me nothing and i get sick reading the get one up crowd rantings. It reminds me so much of the time I was in 1st grade and every body there acted the same as I see some act here. Im sorry but theres just too much taking offense over trivial things in this world anymore.



FlashfyreSP -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 5:12:11 PM)

Actually, I joined up back in 2000 as well, but under a different name. In 2001 I had a "disagreement" with the management here, and I "retired". A year later, I came back under this nom-de-guerre. 



Goblin -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:08:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: robot

Ill tell you I think your all a bunch of twits if you take offense at a simple statement such as the one gunny made. I sit here and read where this are that one is offended by what seems to me nothing and i get sick reading the get one up crowd rantings. It reminds me so much of the time I was in 1st grade and every body there acted the same as I see some act here. Im sorry but theres just too much taking offense over trivial things in this world anymore.



The statement was offensive because there is a basis for offense, robot. I did not just log on and decide to be offended by the first post I read; I think you know that.

There is a very in-depth history behind some of our feelings, which most people are unaware of, and which is part of the reason I spoke up. It is not 'trivial' by any means. I do not want newer players thinking things that are inaccurate and based on false statement, and will speak up when I see it happen.

I do apologize if I appeared rude. I was attempting to be straightforward. My apologies to you, robot, but I will speak up when I feel I should.


Goblin




Goblin -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:08:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FlashfyreSP

Actually, I joined up back in 2000 as well, but under a different name. In 2001 I had a "disagreement" with the management here, and I "retired". A year later, I came back under this nom-de-guerre. 


Loser.[:'(]



Goblin -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:09:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

IIRC, 02 was known as "The year of the Locked threads"
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]


[:@]



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:46:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

IIRC, 02 was known as "The year of the Locked threads"
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]


[image]http://www.spwaw.com/phpBB2/images/smiles/kick2.gif[/image]

Ohhhhhhh...refs, can that be considered a shot below the belt? [:D]



Riun T -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:48:53 PM)

Kick em in the junk!!



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/2/2007 6:56:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bernie

[image]http://spwaw.com/phpBB2/images/smiles/sign_hijack.gif[/image]


hmmm, perhaps this is true but then again....when is the last time you saw a thread with THIS much activity in it??? [:'(]



Bernie -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/3/2007 5:21:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: robot

Ill tell you I think your all a bunch of twits if you take offense at a simple statement such as the one gunny made. I sit here and read where this are that one is offended by what seems to me nothing and i get sick reading the get one up crowd rantings. It reminds me so much of the time I was in 1st grade and every body there acted the same as I see some act here. Im sorry but theres just too much taking offense over trivial things in this world anymore.


I'm sorry you feel that way Robot. My purpose here was to reply to a statement made by Gunny, regarding his opinion of why many of the members here no longer visit or post here. If you were party to past such episodes with Gunny perhaps you would understand why it was important to do so.

It's not a case of "taking offense". Glenn's statement, unchallenged, might have had newcomers here believing it to be fact, rather than opinion. As someone who is a member of, as he termed it, "the 'old' SPWaW crowd", I felt a rebuttal was in order. Who better to rebut such a statement then representatives of the very group he speaks of?



Orzel Bialy -> RE: The Queen of Battle: The Infantry (1/3/2007 5:49:30 AM)

Well I guess this thread turned out to be yet another example that should teach one and all to be aware of the watchword "Responsibility" while posting.

While fishing you can open a can of worms and at worst end up cleaning up a tangled mess of the slippery critters...on a forum you open up a can of worms and they may just eat you alive. [:'(]



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1