RE: Why I am not interested... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Modern Tactics



Message

Andrew Williams -> RE: Why I am not interested... (11/22/2007 10:03:01 PM)

LOL

My Aston Martin DB5 may be old but she's still a thing of beauty.

:)


edit: In fact, I may be old but.................



Zap -> RE: Why I am not interested... (11/23/2007 12:18:54 AM)

Judge,
I gained a victory in that scenario. I kept my troops on the hill where the StugIIi is located(lost my tank by the way). On the other side brought the infantry up to the hill. What happened is the Russians crossed the river I picked them off as they advanced. I Did not take one objective hex in the victory.



Reiryc -> RE: Why I am not interested... (11/23/2007 6:03:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

I think that's my point...lethality.

I kid you not. As soon as a squad shows their face, regardless of covering fire, suppressing fire or ditches, flanking manouvres, attacks from multiple sides.....regardless of all that...my squads die in seconds (if not, then routed/surrendered) and this is on the easy setting.

Not good. And seeing as this is meant to be more lethal, I can only see it as another game to practice my frustration skills.

I had started this post in the vein hope of being persuaded otherwise, but I'm afraid there has been nothing here to do that. All I've had, really, is advice to use certain tactics that are, tbh, basic knowledge and are most definitely being implemented by me.

Man, if a Stug III, HMG, MG and mortar team firing on a building concealing an AT team for 3-5 minutes isn't enough to supress that AT team, then I give up...truly I do. Not to mention having two squads closing in from either side!!



I apologize for offering the tactics that work(ed) quite well for me. I should have known that you were using these tactics as they are 'basic knowledge'.





JudgeDredd -> RE: Why I am not interested... (11/23/2007 9:56:25 AM)

Reiryc

The reason I changed my post was because I realised
  • That you were simply trying to be helpful
  • I wasn't as clear as I though I was about the tactics I employed and, therefore, your sound advice was just that...sound
The fact that you got an email detailing what I posted was within seconds of me realising my post was out of order and I retracted the comment. I truly thought I had laid out clearly the tactics I had employed.

Perhaps a more appropriate response would've been to thank you, but I forgot my response would be sent, so I simply edited it. So sincere thanks for taking the time to post such a lengthy and time consuming post.

I apologise, and I would never try to dissuade anyone from posting helpful information pertaining to playing a game.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.15625