WWIII (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Opponents Wanted



Message


Casus_Belli -> WWIII (12/28/2008 8:30:20 AM)

I'm playing USSR in a single-player game of WWIII, and I'd like to play against humans. Are there a few other people interested? [8|]




RufusTFirefly -> RE: WWIII (12/28/2008 10:37:17 AM)

Hi,

I am on short holiday til Jan2nd, but afterwards I would like to join. I would prefer China, but I would do any other side if necessary.




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (12/28/2008 1:14:36 PM)

well cas i will join  but maybe we could do a two player game too.




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (12/29/2008 8:56:33 PM)

Also interested so we have a 4 players game here.




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (12/29/2008 8:56:58 PM)

Also interested so we have a 4 players game here




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (12/29/2008 10:26:49 PM)

Who sets it up? Should I just go ahead and do a turn as the USSR? It'll take a while, a few days possibly, but I'll start now.




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (12/29/2008 10:49:46 PM)

First turn is NATO. What wants it?
I'll be USSR.




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (12/29/2008 11:06:22 PM)

ill be nato

but remember rufus is on holiday so if we add him we will be waiting a few days for it to continue




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (12/29/2008 11:13:55 PM)

Turn one sent to NATO/82nd trooper
Casus is USSR
Who wants USA and China?




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (12/30/2008 2:14:28 AM)

turn back to russia

looks like nato is gonna take it hard 

berlin is surrounded but nato forces opened a small path long enuff to get some resupply in.




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (12/30/2008 2:18:38 PM)

Working on USSR's turn. The first turn may take a while, a day or two, for organising. It's huge!




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (12/30/2008 11:33:24 PM)

USSR turn done. Next player is China. Who wants it?




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (12/31/2008 9:33:28 PM)

If I am China, I can play it on the 1st of January (mavnb@hotmail.com)
but I would rather be USA as I play other ww3 games as USA so
I don't want to "spy" on China.




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (12/31/2008 9:34:52 PM)

82nd trooper,
send mail to mavnb@hotmail so we can co-ordinate.




hatemf90 -> RE: WWIII (1/1/2009 12:51:56 PM)

got room for 1 more? [:)] will play with anything

coldfire_tow@hotmail.com




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (1/1/2009 3:29:05 PM)

If there are no objections, I'll send the China move to hatem.




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (1/1/2009 3:34:34 PM)

So as far as I know it's like this:

Russia/Casus
NATO/82nd
China/hatem
USA/mavnb

Aux armes!




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (1/1/2009 5:59:48 PM)

Just my 2 cents but rufus said he would be
China first and he will play the turn in 1 day.




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (1/1/2009 9:58:06 PM)

Huge apologies. [&o] Mavnb is correct. We're just waiting for Rufus. I will pm and email hatem and tell him. There are only four players in WWIII right?




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (1/1/2009 10:06:47 PM)

yes, 4 players. BUT it does not prevent us to sending
to the other guy ALSO so we have 2 different
games running at the same time.




RufusTFirefly -> RE: WWIII (1/2/2009 5:46:19 PM)

Back from holidays.

I have not yet got any file. But if you have already send the turn to hatem and he wants to play, just let him take the part of Japan.




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (1/2/2009 6:01:52 PM)

no rufus said he would be japan
so hatem can be china :)

so its like this

Russia/Casus
NATO/82nd
China/hatem
USA/mavnb
japan/Rufus




Grymme -> RE: WWIII (1/2/2009 6:03:29 PM)

Hmmm... what scenario are you talking about.

There is no Japan in the WWIII - East vs West scenario. There is only USSR, NATO, PDRC (china) and USA.




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (1/2/2009 7:43:36 PM)

oops ok your right  we have two different games going on and i obviously amd getting them confused




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (1/2/2009 10:43:07 PM)

Man, I shoulda stopped smoking that stuff years ago! [sm=Christo_pull_hair.gif]

I did the Russia move in a WWIII game and sent it to hatem. I should've sent it to Rufus. mavnb suggested that I could still do that and we could have two games going. Since we haven't heard from hatem again, this seems like a good idea. Then there would be three games going (that I'm a part of) as follows:

WWIII
Russia/Casus
NATO/82nd
China/hatem
USA/mavnb


WWIII
Russia/Casus
NATO/82nd
China/Rufus
USA/mavnb

and
WAW
Germany/Casus
West/82nd
Japan/Rufus
Russia and China/Giacomo

Is this right?




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (1/2/2009 11:33:40 PM)

looks right to me but hatem just posted yesterday so i expect we will hear from him again soon. but there is fine if my poor old brain can keep track of them




RufusTFirefly -> RE: WWIII (1/3/2009 11:19:43 AM)

Thanks, Casus, for posting a list that hopefully gets all cleared up now.

In case you want to play two games of WWIII, we should not mix up the turns. I have a directory for each game I play. So, saving the files in the right directory and using different file names would help.




Casus_Belli -> RE: WWIII (1/4/2009 3:05:13 PM)

I'd be happy to play any game at all, really. Where are they all? [&:]




mavnb -> RE: WWIII (1/5/2009 1:07:01 AM)

still waiting for any file from Rufus
or hatem for the ww3 game.
Mavnd[&:]




82ndtrooper -> RE: WWIII (1/5/2009 1:50:51 AM)

aye who has the file now ?

maybe send the turn to rufus ? 

it seems this game has gotten lost should we start it over ?




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.154297