brian brian -> RE: War in China (7/1/2009 12:02:16 AM)
|
It is intriguing. I think China could be doing better in this example game if they would stack their units, even at set-up. This could lead to more casualties but that would require better luck for Japan. Without higher combat rolls, the Japanese would be disorganized more often and progress would slow. But attacking single Chinese units is too easy for the Japanese. On the other hand, the flanks are much bigger now. But for the Chinese, I say stack units or retreat, not just give up so many single units (every unit lost so far from what I have seen). And have the Chinese called any blitz combats to conserve their units? Though again when there is only one of them it is likely to die in a blitz too. And I think China could be doing a bit more to mess with the Japanese by sending out some Cavalry divisions (especially 5 movement point Communist ones) to threaten Japanese supply lines. Away from the coast, Japan can only be in supply in three areas but China is much bigger than that. I don't understand the defense of central China between Si-An and Chang-Sha, it is just more single units given away in an area without a rail line ... let the Japanase come in here, they would need two HQs and long exposed flanks for that to pay off at all. And it would be awesome to build purely infantry as Japan but one rarely has that luxury; Japan has such a hard time disorganizing units that I have them build more planes and artillery to work on this problem. But then if the Chinese never stack their pieces the Japanese don't really need to disorganize them to defeat them. As for the Russians, I do not suggest them messing around in Asia until it is definite that Germany has placed it's bet on a strategy other than '41 Barbarossa, so it is perfectly fine to ignore that possibility for a test game. Don't know if you wanted a commentary on this game but one seemed to have started ... maybe this topic would be better in the China AI thread. I do like the new 'river' railroads a lot though.
|
|
|
|