lostsm -> RE: AI a little /too/ aggressive? (8/6/2009 8:45:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: John Lansford Is there a real point, though, to the AI assaulting bases that they've got no realistic way to hang onto for any length of time? Canton is a good example; the AI landed a SNLF there and was more than enough to wipe out the base force, but nowhere enough to stand up to the force the Allies had available and fairly close by. They kept it for roughly 10 days, never tried to bring in reinforcements (or evac the SNLF, which would have REALLY ticked me off), or resupply. A few days bombardment by some cruisers, bombing by my CV's (not even all the DB's since I expected some naval intervention), and the two NZ brigades and it was all over. Now, had the SNLF landed, wiped out my base force, had some way to destroy the facilities (returning Canton to its original condition, for example), and then left, simulating a raid on the base, now THAT would have been great. It would force me to try and beef up all those isolated bases with garrisons or risk losing them with no way to 'get back' at the AI, and the AI doesn't lose anything in the process (assuming they evac successfully). that would be very cool if the AI did stuff like that. i've yet to play as allies, but i can imagine them doing that to me, and it would be a real pain
|
|
|
|