AI too weak (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Operation Barbarossa: The Struggle for Russia



Message


qy_panzer -> AI too weak (9/28/2009 2:25:47 PM)

even in the general difficulty, I can easily win the battle without losing any unit, I'm in Kiev now.




Ronald Wendt -> RE: AI too weak (9/28/2009 3:03:39 PM)

Hello,

the Kiev of the first campaign or the Kiev in the second campaign ?




qy_panzer -> RE: AI too weak (9/28/2009 3:39:43 PM)

first campaign, rather easy.




Ronald Wendt -> RE: AI too weak (9/29/2009 7:24:38 AM)

Hello,

quote:

ORIGINAL: qy_panzer

first campaign, rather easy.


The difficulty should raise with every scenario and from campaign to campaign (thus the figures before them).




qy_panzer -> RE: AI too weak (9/29/2009 3:13:20 PM)

Now I arrived at vyazma, the difficulty improves, the russians comes across the dnepr river to cut my army off.




Alan Sharif -> RE: AI too weak (10/1/2009 3:14:58 PM)

Maybe it is just me but after the first two or three battles I do not find the AI weak. Also, I am losing units all the time:(  As I say, could just be my'style' of play. The game turn limitation makes me take risks, which is a good thing I think.   




ComradeP -> RE: AI too weak (10/1/2009 5:15:18 PM)

Keep in mind that, although you can often win the scenario if you take your time, the AI is generally there to keep you from gaining a BV. Most of the later scenarios of the Barbarossa campaign do require a fair deal of planning if you want to get BV's, especially if your core units don't include many aircraft to soften up a hex before you arrive.

All in all, I think the AI is doing a fair job thus far, similar to the PG series.




Ronald Wendt -> RE: AI too weak (10/2/2009 8:25:01 AM)

Hello,

quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

Keep in mind that, although you can often win the scenario if you take your time, the AI is generally there to keep you from gaining a BV. Most of the later scenarios of the Barbarossa campaign do require a fair deal of planning if you want to get BV's, especially if your core units don't include many aircraft to soften up a hex before you arrive.

All in all, I think the AI is doing a fair job thus far, similar to the PG series.


Its true the AI defeats you if you cannot reach you objectives, so the AI is slowing down your progress. Btw. this is what was done by the opponent if the attacker was too powerful - delaying things and hoping for reinforcements.
The Barbarossa Campaign starts easy and gets into moderate-to-hard depending on your experience as player and the size and composition of your army. Always considering getting all the BVs as a goal.




Larac -> RE: AI too weak (10/9/2009 1:42:04 AM)

Two questions:

Can the AI be Modded?

Is there an Editor for the game?

Lee




Rosseau -> RE: AI too weak (10/9/2009 1:55:18 AM)

Yes Larac, a darn good one. But you need to save often! Already created two 20-scenario campaign games pretty easily. No AI editor, but you can craft things so the scenarios play out to your liking.




Larac -> RE: AI too weak (10/9/2009 2:36:29 AM)

Thanks for the reply.

Doing some research on AI for games, and looking for those I can use as test beds.

Lee




Rosseau -> RE: AI too weak (10/9/2009 4:11:19 AM)

Not to hijack yet another thread, but you'd want to look at HOI3, as the AI routines are almost totally accessible to the sure via lua, etc.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.671875