jetjockey -> RE: Suppressing shore batteries? (8/19/2010 6:06:03 PM)
|
Shore-battery suppression will be a problem. In my PBEM I attacked Port Moresby in Apr-May '42 and lost nearly 50 APs, AKs (troop conversion), a few AKs (cargo) and an LSD to shore batteries[:@]. I had 7 BBs and 6 CAs running multiple bombardment missions, KB attacked twice to little effect, and Bettys from Rabaul kept up a nearly continuous "Rain of Steel." My Most Worthy Opponent obviously reinforced and dug in, but at no time could I reduce the count of CD guns firing below 200[&:]. I went to great lengths to suppress those shore batteries, but had little effect; I lost 1-2 transports from each TF every turn, while my escorts remained relatively untouched. The 6" CD guns only dented my CAs and CLs while each transport could only absorb one or two hits. (I am happy to report that those 6" CD guns are now being converted into 18" AP and HE ammunition.[:D]) I have no certain solution to this problem, but for my next amphibious invasion, I will: 1) divide my assault force over a much larger number of transports (expediting the off-load), 2) combine all assault forces into one TF (reduced opportunity for CD guns to fire each turn), & 3) test the utility of 18" ammunition[sm=00000959.gif]. This may help, then again... If not, I'll call for some reinforcements[sm=character0167.gif].
|
|
|
|