TheGrayMouser -> RE: For those who have tried them both (12/10/2010 3:38:41 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rosseau Give me your address, and I'll mail you Gallic Wars. Just can't play it, and I tried. All the details are there, but the interface is cumbersome and very old school. Maybe I'm just getting lazy in my old age. But I'd rather play FoG and expansions in the time I have left! Especially with their MP server. I love HPS, but there's no contest. I have Alexandrian Wars, too. Their new France 1914 game is such a labor of love. But again, for me, so slow and cumbersome as to be unplayable. Best to you! I own Punic wars, its one of those games that I WANT to love, but just cant dive in for some reason... Like you said all the detail and depth is there... i tend to think part of the problem, at least for me, is the learning curve coupled with the lack of feedback to what you are doing and why its wrong;). The AI slaps me around even in the shorter scenarios and i just cant figure out why my skirmishers end up routed or disordered after a turn of skirmishing an equal # of AI skirmishers etc.... Another issue is (as is all JT games) the AI takes ridiculously long turns for some of the larger battles (30plus minutes sometimes!) Maybe i am losing patience the older I get, I dunno. Somdday i will sit down and take the time to learn these games...
|
|
|
|