Pawlock -> (10/22/2002 8:59:26 AM)
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by pasternakski [B] None took longer than two months. One was as short as 10 real-time days. All eight were pre-agreed one-day-turn games. We all have jobs. Some of us are married. We all have a life (except my pal Rodney, who has something none of the rest of us have been able to figure out - he posts here - I won't tell you his username as long as he agrees to pay me handsomely). [/B][/QUOTE] Wow, none of your games took longer than 2 months, even the ones you played to the bitter end. When you break that down, in order to accomplish that you must have been averaging at least 10 turns a day, every day for 60 days, solid !!!!! Hats off to you, thats hell of an accomplishment in its own right, kudos to you , but I perhaps think that while not an exception, the average player is never gonna find time to return that kind of average. Me I suppose people would class me as a slow player , 15 - 30 minutes for a turn, sometimes more if theres a lot going on. Im not a grognard by any means, but I really must have control of everything. The beauty of these types of games is the ability to sit back and ponder strategy without worry of time constraints too much. This is why although I would love RTS games , I cant play them as everything happens too quick for me:-) Anyway, what point I was trying to make is this, Pasternakski I dont think I would class you as a average player (speedwise, and time available to play) ,but rather a fast player who also has the luxury of similar oppenents with a lot of time to devote to the game. Maybe Im wrong and Im not just slow , but extremly slow and your the average player. At the end of the day it all depends on the type of players you and your oppenents are and what time both of you have to devote to the game. Also timezones are gonna make a huge difference too.
|
|
|
|