RE: Do you have the time? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/28/2012 11:28:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski

warspite1, how are you enjoying sharing our 'personal' two threads, PB and Time?
And how long can or will we be allowed to continue.(That was time related, hehe.)
Warspite1

I am having great fun sharing these threads - I've had a good chuckle. How long can it last? Well you want 25,000 posts and I want World peace and a knighthood, so we'll see.....



Quite, but what of the Matrix Forums moderators?? I wonder how long they will tolerate our brilliant Peanut Brittle historical discussion, our Time philosophies or our gigantic wit.
Warspite1

Why? Are we breaking forum rules m'colleague?



Damn it three times round the carpark and back in for another DAMN, we are breaking no rules. Damn Marjorie.

Warspite1

Don't talk to me about Marjorie, Steiner - Uttoxeter's not big enough for the three of us.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/28/2012 11:40:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski

warspite1, how are you enjoying sharing our 'personal' two threads, PB and Time?
And how long can or will we be allowed to continue.(That was time related, hehe.)
Warspite1

I am having great fun sharing these threads - I've had a good chuckle. How long can it last? Well you want 25,000 posts and I want World peace and a knighthood, so we'll see.....



Quite, but what of the Matrix Forums moderators?? I wonder how long they will tolerate our brilliant Peanut Brittle historical discussion, our Time philosophies or our gigantic wit.
Warspite1

Why? Are we breaking forum rules m'colleague?



Damn it three times round the carpark and back in for another DAMN, we are breaking no rules. Damn Marjorie.

Warspite1

Don't talk to me about Marjorie, Steiner - Uttoxeter's not big enough for the three of us.


"Hell, triple blast and dammit to hade's twice."




warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/28/2012 11:44:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski

warspite1, how are you enjoying sharing our 'personal' two threads, PB and Time?
And how long can or will we be allowed to continue.(That was time related, hehe.)
Warspite1

I am having great fun sharing these threads - I've had a good chuckle. How long can it last? Well you want 25,000 posts and I want World peace and a knighthood, so we'll see.....



Quite, but what of the Matrix Forums moderators?? I wonder how long they will tolerate our brilliant Peanut Brittle historical discussion, our Time philosophies or our gigantic wit.
Warspite1

Why? Are we breaking forum rules m'colleague?



Damn it three times round the carpark and back in for another DAMN, we are breaking no rules. Damn Marjorie.

Warspite1

Don't talk to me about Marjorie, Steiner - Uttoxeter's not big enough for the three of us.


"Hell, triple blast and dammit to hade's twice."

Warspite1

Well yes, exactly......I see Orm didn't stick around too long tonight. Maybe he has a life?




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/28/2012 11:45:54 PM)

Screech. Wrong thread.

Now for something completely the same:

A "life", what's that?




warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/28/2012 11:46:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski

Robbie Coltrane will be playing the part.
Warspite1

Eh?




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 8:32:36 AM)

quote:

Well yes, exactly......I see Orm didn't stick around too long tonight. Maybe he has a life?

No, no life. I do not have time for a life. [;)]




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 12:49:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Well yes, exactly......I see Orm didn't stick around too long tonight. Maybe he has a life?

No, no life. I do not have time for a life. [;)]



Yes, but no one has yet to give me the correct time.




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 1:59:54 PM)

quote:

Yes, but no one has yet to give me the correct time.

I suggest you contact International Bureau of Weights and Measures to get the correct time. I doubt that anyone else can give the correct time since they are the ones who decide what the correct time is.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 2:02:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Yes, but no one has yet to give me the correct time.

I suggest you contact International Bureau of Weights and Measures to get the correct time. I doubt that anyone else can give the correct time since they are the ones who decide what the correct time is.


Maybe, but the International Bureau of Weights and Measures has always refused to adopt use Peanut Brittle time pieces, which keep better time that the atomic clock.




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 2:09:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Yes, but no one has yet to give me the correct time.

I suggest you contact International Bureau of Weights and Measures to get the correct time. I doubt that anyone else can give the correct time since they are the ones who decide what the correct time is.


Maybe, but the International Bureau of Weights and Measures has always refused to adopt use Peanut Brittle time pieces, which keep better time that the atomic clock.

Then you are in trouble and have to manage without the correct time because the last Peanut Brittle time piece has been eaten. This because a leader of a suicide pact decided that to eat the Peanut Brittle time pieces would make all the member know when it was the right time for the mass suicide. Apparently it worked since parts of the time pieces were made of BPB and their time arrived at once...




warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 2:25:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Well yes, exactly......I see Orm didn't stick around too long tonight. Maybe he has a life?

No, no life. I do not have time for a life. [;)]



Yes, but no one has yet to give me the correct time.
Warspite1

I share your frustration Steiner; are any of these the correct time?

Time (Clock of the Heart) - Culture Club
Rumors - Time(x) Social Club
Sign O The Time(s) - Prince
Fine Time - Yazz
Baby One More Time - Britney Spears
Time after Time - Cyndi Lauper
In the (Summer)time - Mungo Jerry
Do That To Me One More Time - Captain and Toenail
If I Could Turn Back Time - Cher
Good Time(s) - Chic
Big Time - Peter Gabriel

I hope one of these satisfies your needs because I am getting increasingly angry with the whole exercise. I am going to end up taking my frustration out on someone's face - and then I'll end up doing time.

Edit for appalling spelling




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 2:29:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Yes, but no one has yet to give me the correct time.

I suggest you contact International Bureau of Weights and Measures to get the correct time. I doubt that anyone else can give the correct time since they are the ones who decide what the correct time is.


Maybe, but the International Bureau of Weights and Measures has always refused to adopt use Peanut Brittle time pieces, which keep better time that the atomic clock.

Then you are in trouble and have to manage without the correct time because the last Peanut Brittle time piece has been eaten. This because a leader of a suicide pact decided that to eat the Peanut Brittle time pieces would make all the member know when it was the right time for the mass suicide. Apparently it worked since parts of the time pieces were made of BPB and their time arrived at once...


You better be joking. If not, we are doomed. Why are we doomed you ask? Because humans will be immune to all man-made antibiotics by 2014 and, as noted in Ambrose's Peanut Brittle - The Only Remaining Medicine to Fight Any Disease., "...humans have been hurtling toward the day when man-made antibiotics will no longer fight off anything, including BPB madness. Core PB is known to fight off every infection in the world..."




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 3:43:37 PM)

quote:

I hope one of these satisfies your needs because I am getting increasingly angry with the whole exercise. I am going to end up taking my frustration out on someone's face - and then I'll end up doing time.

So you paint to relax. I suppose that your portraits are good since you take your time painting them.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 3:45:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

I hope one of these satisfies your needs because I am getting increasingly angry with the whole exercise. I am going to end up taking my frustration out on someone's face - and then I'll end up doing time.

So you paint to relax. I suppose that your portraits are good since you take your time painting them.


But how much TIME is he taking????[:-]




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 3:46:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

I hope one of these satisfies your needs because I am getting increasingly angry with the whole exercise. I am going to end up taking my frustration out on someone's face - and then I'll end up doing time.

So you paint to relax. I suppose that your portraits are good since you take your time painting them.


But how much TIME is he taking????[:-]


I do not know. Maybe you should take the time and ask him.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 3:50:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

I hope one of these satisfies your needs because I am getting increasingly angry with the whole exercise. I am going to end up taking my frustration out on someone's face - and then I'll end up doing time.

So you paint to relax. I suppose that your portraits are good since you take your time painting them.


But how much TIME is he taking????[:-]


I do not know. Maybe you should take the time and ask him.


Don't you think that if I had the time I would ask? I don't have that kinda time to waste. Sheesh.




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 3:59:01 PM)

quote:

Don't you think that if I had the time I would ask? I don't have that kinda time to waste. Sheesh.

But if the time you currently have is not actually the current time but instead the current time is in fact the future time you will have spare time to use when you wait in the future time to become the current time. You can use that spare time to make time for asking him. If you time it right you will then have catched up with current time and if not time will tell.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 4:05:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Don't you think that if I had the time I would ask? I don't have that kinda time to waste. Sheesh.

But if the time you currently have is not actually the current time but instead the current time is in fact the future time you will have spare time to use when you wait in the future time to become the current time. You can use that spare time to make time for asking him. If you time it right you will then have catched up with current time and if not time will tell.


How much time did you need to think about that?

Ok, if time could "tell" then I would not need to be on the Search for the Holy Time, now would I????




Prince of Eckmühl -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 4:20:38 PM)

Wow, this could be a vehicle to three-thousand![sm=00000280.gif]




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 4:23:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Don't you think that if I had the time I would ask? I don't have that kinda time to waste. Sheesh.

But if the time you currently have is not actually the current time but instead the current time is in fact the future time you will have spare time to use when you wait in the future time to become the current time. You can use that spare time to make time for asking him. If you time it right you will then have catched up with current time and if not time will tell.


How much time did you need to think about that?

Ok, if time could "tell" then I would not need to be on the Search for the Holy Time, now would I????

No time worth mentioning. But the time I needed to formulate my thoughts into written english took some time.

Oh. I asumed that if you missed the Holy Time you would know that you were to late. So if the Holy Time is in the future all you have to do is wait for the time and then the time will arrive for the Holy Time to arrive. But if you have no idea when the time is right then one can asume that the time is always wrong and time will not tell then since, obviously, the time is wrong.




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 4:25:25 PM)

And now, unfortunately, it is time for me to do some paperwork. [:(]




Orm -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 4:27:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

Wow, this could be a vehicle to three-thousand![sm=00000280.gif]

I would like to say that time will tell if this is the vehicle for that journey. But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.




Prince of Eckmühl -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 4:44:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.

That reminds me of the famous Eisenhower adage, "Things have never been more like the way they are today in history."




warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:01:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.

That reminds me of the famous Eisenhower adage, "Things have never been more like the way they are today in history."

Warspite1

Or to put it another way, in the words of the late, but very great Stan Laurel " You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead". [&o][&o]




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:04:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

Wow, this could be a vehicle to three-thousand![sm=00000280.gif]


Oh mighty Prince I would have to be shameless to use this as a crutch to 3,000, or my real goal of 25,000.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:07:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

Wow, this could be a vehicle to three-thousand![sm=00000280.gif]

I would like to say that time will tell if this is the vehicle for that journey. But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.


You are a defacto member of this march to my greatness, along with warspite1, Terminus and now Prince of Eckmühl.

If future time arrives on time then I might complete my quest for time. But if I do not know what time future time arrives then, well...




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:08:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.

That reminds me of the famous Eisenhower adage, "Things have never been more like the way they are today in history."

Warspite1

Or to put it another way, in the words of the late, but very great Stan Laurel " You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead". [&o][&o]


warspite1, I appreciate all input, but you must stay on topic. What time during his life did Stan Laurel say that?????[:-]




warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:41:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.

That reminds me of the famous Eisenhower adage, "Things have never been more like the way they are today in history."

Warspite1

Or to put it another way, in the words of the late, but very great Stan Laurel " You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead". [&o][&o]


warspite1, I appreciate all input, but you must stay on topic. What time during his life did Stan Laurel say that?????[:-]
Warspite1

I believe it was from the 1930 Laurel and Hardy film Brats. As for the time he said it - you will be less than surprised to learn I do not have a flippin clue.




parusski -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:43:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.

That reminds me of the famous Eisenhower adage, "Things have never been more like the way they are today in history."

Warspite1

Or to put it another way, in the words of the late, but very great Stan Laurel " You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead". [&o][&o]


warspite1, I appreciate all input, but you must stay on topic. What time during his life did Stan Laurel say that?????[:-]
Warspite1

I believe it was from the 1930 Laurel and Hardy film Brats. As for the time he said it - you will be less than surprised to learn I do not have a flippin clue.


Interesting hypothesis. I am very surprised you do not know, I thought you knew everything.




warspite1 -> RE: Do you have the time? (1/29/2012 5:46:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: parusski


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm
But I have recently been informed that time do not tell so I have no clue what will happen in time.

That reminds me of the famous Eisenhower adage, "Things have never been more like the way they are today in history."

Warspite1

Or to put it another way, in the words of the late, but very great Stan Laurel " You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead". [&o][&o]


warspite1, I appreciate all input, but you must stay on topic. What time during his life did Stan Laurel say that?????[:-]
Warspite1

I believe it was from the 1930 Laurel and Hardy film Brats. As for the time he said it - you will be less than surprised to learn I do not have a flippin clue.


Interesting hypothesis. I am very surprised you do not know, I thought you knew everything.
Warspite1

Whilst I admit that I have the brain the size of a planet, said planet is pluto, looked at from a telescope held the wrong way around, on a cloudy night. My brain cannot match that of yours [&o] Steiner, nor indeed the great Ambrose himself alas.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.75