RE: 4,000 Posts

RE: 4,000 Posts (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion

Message

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/9/2012 1:04:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl quote: ORIGINAL: parusski AMEN to that. Not bad parusski, but you're not there yet. This is the sort of thing that I'm talking about: quote: ORIGINAL: John Donne Jesus wept. In short, you've got to wrassle with them words, parusski, wrassle 'em like they was a bear! And until you get your word-count under control, you'll never be anything but a pretender to the crown, an unintended consort to "the Grand Old Lady." It's the only way there, fella, and 40K is at the end of the journey. Make us proud.[sm=happy0029.gif] K

Prince of Eckmühl -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/9/2012 1:21:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski K Excellent. [sm=character0272.gif]

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/9/2012 1:23:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl quote: ORIGINAL: parusski K Excellent. [sm=character0272.gif] Mmm. [sm=00000946.gif]

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/10/2012 11:16:18 PM)
Warpsite1 everybody is counting on you to reach 5000 by the end of February.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/11/2012 4:17:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Warpsite1 everybody is counting on you to reach 5000 by the end of February. Warspite1 Thanks Dr Rumack

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 7:51:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Warpsite1 everybody is counting on you to reach 5000 by the end of February. Warspite1 I have often wondered what are peoples favourite Element. In particular I would like to know why that is, and also what symbol is used to denote said element. This could be a fascinating discussion topic n'est pas?

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 7:53:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Warpsite1 everybody is counting on you to reach 5000 by the end of February. Warspite1 I have often wondered what are peoples favourite Element. In particular I would like to know why that is, and also what symbol is used to denote said element. This could be a fascinating discussion topic n'est pas? Maybe, but as gunhawk said, paraphrasing here, "who cares about anyone's 'favorite anything'. So maybe their least favorite element?? Either way I will work diligently to artificially inflate your post count. We need to get you to 4110 quickly.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 7:56:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski Warpsite1 everybody is counting on you to reach 5000 by the end of February. Warspite1 I have often wondered what are peoples favourite Element. In particular I would like to know why that is, and also what symbol is used to denote said element. This could be a fascinating discussion topic n'est pas? Maybe, but as gunhawk said, paraphrasing here, "who cares about anyone's 'favorite anything'. So maybe their least favorite element?? Either way I will work diligently to artificially inflate your post count. We need to get you to 4110 quickly. Warspite1 [:-] I am not looking to artificially inflate my post count - that is scurrilous sir. How very dare you! I am simply looking for great stories and meaningful insight into the wonderful world of the Periodic Table.

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 8:06:49 PM)
quote: I am simply looking for great stories and meaningful insight into the wonderful world of the Periodic Table. Yeah. Also stories about TPT would be inspirational and maybe profitable to us.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 8:09:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: I am simply looking for great stories and meaningful insight into the wonderful world of the Periodic Table. Yeah. Also stories about TPT would be inspirational and maybe profitable to us. Warspite1 Well I know its a subject dear to your heart (as proven with post 61) you are clearly attracted to Potassium are you not?

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 8:17:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: I am simply looking for great stories and meaningful insight into the wonderful world of the Periodic Table. Yeah. Also stories about TPT would be inspirational and maybe profitable to us. Warspite1 Well I know its a subject dear to your heart (as proven with post 61) you are clearly attracted to Potassium are you not? LOL, great catch.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 8:24:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: I am simply looking for great stories and meaningful insight into the wonderful world of the Periodic Table. Yeah. Also stories about TPT would be inspirational and maybe profitable to us. Warspite1 Well I know its a subject dear to your heart (as proven with post 61) you are clearly attracted to Potassium are you not? LOL, great catch. Warspite1 I thought you would appreciate that one - I really PB'd you along there [8D]

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:02:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: I am simply looking for great stories and meaningful insight into the wonderful world of the Periodic Table. Yeah. Also stories about TPT would be inspirational and maybe profitable to us. Warspite1 Well I know its a subject dear to your heart (as proven with post 61) you are clearly attracted to Potassium are you not? LOL, great catch. Warspite1 I thought you would appreciate that one - I really PB'd you along there [8D] Warspite1 Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated?

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:06:15 PM)
quote: Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated? It's okay W. Look how few people participate in our other high-brow threads. They have no taste.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:09:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated? It's okay W. Look how few people participate in our other high-brow threads. They have no taste. Warspite1 Yes I know - I think I just need the right catalyst; like water on magnesium. I know, who would like to say a few words on the Inert Gases?

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:13:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated? It's okay W. Look how few people participate in our other high-brow threads. They have no taste. Warspite1 Yes I know - I think I just need the right catalyst; like water on magnesium. I know, who would like to say a few words on the Inert Gases? Well I have gas at the moment. Will that do?

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:17:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated? It's okay W. Look how few people participate in our other high-brow threads. They have no taste. Warspite1 Yes I know - I think I just need the right catalyst; like water on magnesium. I know, who would like to say a few words on the Inert Gases? Well I have gas at the moment. Will that do? Warspite1 Erm, thanks Steiner, although I was kind of hoping for something along the lines of: The noble, a.k.a the Inert, gases are a group of chemical elements with very similar properties: under standard conditions, they are all odorless, colorless, monatomic gases, with very low chemical reactivity. The six noble gases that occur naturally are helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar), krypton (Kr), xenon (Xe), and the radioactive radon (Rn). For the first six periods of the periodic table, the noble gases are exactly the members of group 18 of the periodic table. However, this no longer holds in the seventh period (due to relativistic effects): the next member of group 18, ununoctium, is probably not a noble gas. Instead, group 14 member ununquadium exhibits noble-gas-like properties.

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:19:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated? It's okay W. Look how few people participate in our other high-brow threads. They have no taste. Warspite1 Yes I know - I think I just need the right catalyst; like water on magnesium. I know, who would like to say a few words on the Inert Gases? Well I have gas at the moment. Will that do? Warspite1 Erm, thanks Steiner, although I was kind of hoping for something along the lines of: The noble, a.k.a the Inert, gases are a group of chemical elements with very similar properties: under standard conditions, they are all odorless, colorless, monatomic gases, with very low chemical reactivity. The six noble gases that occur naturally are helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar), krypton (Kr), xenon (Xe), and the radioactive radon (Rn). For the first six periods of the periodic table, the noble gases are exactly the members of group 18 of the periodic table. However, this no longer holds in the seventh period (due to relativistic effects): the next member of group 18, ununoctium, is probably not a noble gas. Instead, group 14 member ununquadium exhibits noble-gas-like properties. Oh well, the Pepcid worked. Give me some time to over this gas attack and I will quote some Ambrose on this subject.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:23:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Well this isn't going too well is it? No response. I know, I'll try something to kick start the thread; What do people think of Sodium? A useful element or a little bit overrated? It's okay W. Look how few people participate in our other high-brow threads. They have no taste. Warspite1 Yes I know - I think I just need the right catalyst; like water on magnesium. I know, who would like to say a few words on the Inert Gases? Well I have gas at the moment. Will that do? Warspite1 Erm, thanks Steiner, although I was kind of hoping for something along the lines of: The noble, a.k.a the Inert, gases are a group of chemical elements with very similar properties: under standard conditions, they are all odorless, colorless, monatomic gases, with very low chemical reactivity. The six noble gases that occur naturally are helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar), krypton (Kr), xenon (Xe), and the radioactive radon (Rn). For the first six periods of the periodic table, the noble gases are exactly the members of group 18 of the periodic table. However, this no longer holds in the seventh period (due to relativistic effects): the next member of group 18, ununoctium, is probably not a noble gas. Instead, group 14 member ununquadium exhibits noble-gas-like properties. Oh well, the Pepcid worked. Give me some time to over this gas attack and I will quote some Ambrose on this subject. Warspite1 Great, that would be good - its definitely time to hitch the intellectual output of this thread up a notch or two. Ambrose will do just right. Ambrose knew soo much about Peanut Brittle, but if anything he knew even more about The Periodic Table [&o].

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:25:21 PM)
quote: Warspite1 Great, that would be good - its definitely time to hitch the intellectual output of this thread up a notch or two. Ambrose will do just right. Ambrose knew soo much about Peanut Brittle, but if anything he knew even more about The Periodic Table . How right you are on all aspects of that post.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:29:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Warspite1 Great, that would be good - its definitely time to hitch the intellectual output of this thread up a notch or two. Ambrose will do just right. Ambrose knew soo much about Peanut Brittle, but if anything he knew even more about The Periodic Table . How right you are on all aspects of that post. Warspite1 I will leave you to research in your own good time, but I have no doubt as part of your study you will be using, Ambroses' 1959 magnum opus: The Periodic Table and how I know even more about this than peanut brittle - Wang Publishing.

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:49:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Warspite1 Great, that would be good - its definitely time to hitch the intellectual output of this thread up a notch or two. Ambrose will do just right. Ambrose knew soo much about Peanut Brittle, but if anything he knew even more about The Periodic Table . How right you are on all aspects of that post. Warspite1 I will leave you to research in your own good time, but I have no doubt as part of your study you will be using, Ambroses' 1959 magnum opus: The Periodic Table and how I know even more about this than peanut brittle - Wang Publishing. I may be using Ambrose's The Real Periodic Table and What it is Actually Filled With, LNG DONG Publishers.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 9:53:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Warspite1 Great, that would be good - its definitely time to hitch the intellectual output of this thread up a notch or two. Ambrose will do just right. Ambrose knew soo much about Peanut Brittle, but if anything he knew even more about The Periodic Table . How right you are on all aspects of that post. Warspite1 I will leave you to research in your own good time, but I have no doubt as part of your study you will be using, Ambroses' 1959 magnum opus: The Periodic Table and how I know even more about this than peanut brittle - Wang Publishing. I may be using Ambrose's The Real Periodic Table and What it is Actually Filled With, LNG DONG Publishers. Warspite1 Cooooool [8D] I didn't think his work was as good once he left for LNG DONG. Even Ambrose admitted that he was never treated as well at the latter and that what marked his time with his first publishers out was, as he himself put it: "I liked the people there, after all, Wang care".

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 10:18:10 PM)
quote: Wang care" RLMAO.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/12/2012 10:22:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Wang care" RLMAO. Warspite1 [;)]

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/13/2012 7:02:03 PM)
Steiner - any news on the Ambrose / Periodic Table situation?

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/13/2012 8:39:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Wang care" RLMAO. Warspite1 [;)] So what is your target date to hit 76,119 posts?

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/13/2012 9:08:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Wang care" RLMAO. Warspite1 [;)] So what is your target date to hit 76,119 posts? Warspite1 Well I'm currently on 4,163, so I estimate in about six hours from now.

parusski -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/13/2012 9:18:16 PM)
[:'(][:'(] quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Wang care" RLMAO. Warspite1 [;)] So what is your target date to hit 76,119 posts? Warspite1 Well I'm currently on 4,163, so I estimate in about six hours from now.

warspite1 -> RE: 4,000 Posts (2/13/2012 10:04:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote: ORIGINAL: parusski quote: Warspite1 Great, that would be good - its definitely time to hitch the intellectual output of this thread up a notch or two. Ambrose will do just right. Ambrose knew soo much about Peanut Brittle, but if anything he knew even more about The Periodic Table . How right you are on all aspects of that post. Warspite1 I will leave you to research in your own good time, but I have no doubt as part of your study you will be using, Ambroses' 1959 magnum opus: The Periodic Table and how I know even more about this than peanut brittle - Wang Publishing. I may be using Ambrose's The Real Periodic Table and What it is Actually Filled With, LNG DONG Publishers. Warspite1 One of Ambroses' more intriguing claims can be found in his 1954 best-seller, Periodic Table: The Early Years. Ambrose claims that the first reference to the Periodic Table in history was in 5th/6th century England. Says Ambrose: Unlike what legend would have us believe, The court of King Arthur featured the Kinghts of the Periodic Table. That Round Table nonesense was just, well nonesense according to Ambrose. Intriguing stuff......

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

8.6875