HansBolter -> RE: Ironman nasty (4/3/2013 5:17:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Andy Mac I am not really familiar with Dababes well enough to do the conversion sorry I respect greatly what the babes team are doing and am more than happy to take data and ship updates (and have) but I disagree with the extra complexity and management required on an LCU front so I have not played it long enough to be comfortable doing the conversion Andy, I have to disagree strongly here. The land model in the game has always seemed like the bastard step child getting third rate priority in everything. Its apparent and obvious to anyone with considerable playing time that in regards to level of detail and complexity the Air model comes first, the Naval model comes second and the Land model has always been a very distant third. After all, we track the skills of individual pilots, but only have overall crew skill ratings for ships. An equivalent level of modeling for the Naval model would have us tracking the skills of individual gun crews! The land model is even worse, we can't even get in game data on the charactistics of indivisual devices, we have to leave the game and open an editor to see the quantified values assigned to individual devices. I would LOVE to be able to click on a Stuart tank device and get a detailed interface of it's stats the same way I can for individual plane models. Any and all increases in detail and complexity for the Land model would be welcome additions.
|
|
|
|