|
Frank W. -> (1/1/2003 9:05:53 PM)
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Goblin
[B]Yeah, yeah. Its not just that. Its rifle fire and MG fire too. I just don't see them scaring a tank crew so bad that it ignores a significant danger like an enemy tank. Or worse yet....
"Mein Gott! They are shooting dozens of rounds at us!! It is very light rifle fire, maybe a .45, and there is a BAR too!! We're in a death trap [I]inside[/I] the tank, we need to bail out! We will be far safer [I]outside[/I] all of this armor!"
Then the crew bails. I think the problem started in 7 or 7.1. In 6, the small arms fire had to be [I]intense[/I] to suppress a tank. It was probably over-corrected. It would be great if it was fixed.
Goblin
PS- Bite me Orzel:mad: ;) [/B][/QUOTE]
i think for normal rifle,pistol and SMG fire the supression for tanks should be lower. but for say .50 cal MG or MG42 it´s okay. If you think of what all can be destroyed by such heavy fire, like sights, antennas, MG´s and other outboard equipment of the tank. okay, a experienced crew will learn that f. the tank or the crew itself there is no danger f. a medium or heavy tank from such fire, but the combat value can be lowered of the vehicle in such cases. the same goes f. infantry or crews assaulting a tank with handgrenades or satchel charges... but if a inf unit have no explosives to actually harm the tank the supression of the tank should be lower, too.
|
|
|
|
