quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

1. We set the price for release on Matrix and Slitherine based on the same price AGEOD had been charging through their online store. We matched their price, we did not exceed it. That's the part of the price-matching which I was referring to earlier. Per our pricing, if this were a new release this would be more like a $40 or $50 game, but we matched the existing price for the AGEOD store.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

1. We set the price for release on Matrix and Slitherine based on the same price AGEOD had been charging through their online store. We matched their price, we did not exceed it. That's the part of the price-matching which I was referring to earlier. Per our pricing, if this were a new release this would be more like a $40 or $50 game, but we matched the existing price for the AGEOD store.

2. The strategy that Paradox was pursuing with the AGEOD titles was indeed getting them out to many, many distributors and they were being sold at much lower prices in many of those places. We completely understand why this looks like a positive thing from the customer's perspective. The problem is, this was actually hurting AGEOD - the result of all that activity and low prices meant that they were not making enough revenue. Our goal is to allow AGEOD to thrive and develop games for a long time to come. Those revenues are not now going to us or to AGEOD in all cases - we're still finding out about some of the places where the games were previously sent and working out what to do. We will honor and support all sales through any distributor, but if your interest is in supporting us or AGEOD please realize that purchasing from the AGEOD, Matrix or Slitherine stores is the best way to support future development.

3. The main reason for our pricing is to make sure that the developers within this niche, who make the kinds of games we all like to play, remain active and financially viable. It is our job as a publisher (and a developer as well) to make money for them and for us, which leads to the virtuous cycle where those games we all enjoy continue to get made. We have a lot of data, including data from AGEOD, that supports this pricing strategy as the best one for the health of this niche.

4. At $24.99 Pride of Nations is still very good value for the gaming dollar.

Regards,

- Erik

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

It is not currently being worked on, but there is a plan to do an update when time allows. Realistically that will be after ACW II which is due July/August.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil

Hi guys,

the simple answer is if you don't like the price don't buy it. NO hard feelings. Feel free to let us know but it doesn't help to have a prolonged argument about why the prices are what they are. We know we're doing what is best for the game based on years of data and we can't share the data with you and explain why we are right. We're regularly told we're wrong but we know we are not, as nobody has more data on this market than us. One example is Battle Academy on iPad. We were told by everyone, I mean everyone in the industry and consumers that the price of $20 was way too high. We stuck with what we thought best and BA is now one of the most successful strategy games in the app store. #1 in 21 countries if I remember correctly, though after a year it has dropped down a bit :)

Can we move on from the price discussion and talk about the game!

Thanks!

quote:

ORIGINAL: italiamedio

I'm gonna jump in here and get in on this conversation because I'm with rogo727 on this one.
btw I think you mean DLC and not DCL?

I've enjoyed your products for a long time and I'd like to clarify that raising the price after you've purchased the rights of a product, and raising the price of that product on other sites, might be legal business procedure but you will lose customers in the long run. Its a form of bait and switch, in a way.

A three year old game and the price increases just because the top honchos want to get their dime back? Come on. If the game was a classic I'd agree, but it's not even old enough to be a classic, and it also lacks the renown for fitting in that category.

rogo makes a few good solid points here, about marketing decisions. Who is making the decisions here? Are they knowledgeable in business management and marketing knowledge? It seems like you guys have a handicap in the marketing department.
Just my opinion.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg

This is interesting. Call me a yes man if you like, but I really don't get all the fuss.

Matrix sells the game at a given price. If you don't want to pay it, don't buy it. Maybe a post that says "I would like to get this game, but I wouldn't pay more than $10" is good feedback. Then move on and buy something else that you think is priced fairly.

We all have different values for these games. Hell, I'd have paid $300 for WITP AE if I had to. On the other hand, I have a number of Matrix games that I have picked up on sale here at the Matrix site that I haven't even opened yet - but I bought them because they were on sale.

Things go out of print sometimes - video games are no different. Plenty of old 8-bit cartridge games that go for pretty high prices on ebay because you can't buy them anywhere else.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg

This is interesting. Call me a yes man if you like, but I really don't get all the fuss.

Matrix sells the game at a given price. If you don't want to pay it, don't buy it. Maybe a post that says "I would like to get this game, but I wouldn't pay more than $10" is good feedback. Then move on and buy something else that you think is priced fairly.

We all have different values for these games. Hell, I'd have paid $300 for WITP AE if I had to. On the other hand, I have a number of Matrix games that I have picked up on sale here at the Matrix site that I haven't even opened yet - but I bought them because they were on sale.

Things go out of print sometimes - video games are no different. Plenty of old 8-bit cartridge games that go for pretty high prices on ebay because you can't buy them anywhere else.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

It's not just their marketing department. While it is true in college I have taken several marketing classes in the UK I am wondering if the teach just the opposite of what I've learned. From what I can tell they have NO customer service skills at all in fact they have no customer service director other than Erik and mr I or mr P and it really shows. For example the Easter egg sale. Need I say more? Because I can. If they had ANYONE. With retail expericence at the re-launch of this three and and half year old game he or she would have said "hey guys wait a minute". For example the head of the American side admitted that no they did not realize that this game was being sold for under two bucks in the states should tell you that I'm right about this. While they say they know what they are doing it makes you wonder at times.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

The price isn't going to change. No amount of complaining is going to change that.


What is far more important is:

Will I be able to get the DLC if I want them, being that I bought this when it came out?

What is the best way to play Russia?

And it's obvious that Matrix knows what it's doing. They're still here, unlike, say, SSI/Microprose.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

The "fuss" is all about this. Before matrix purchased the rights to this game you could legally buy it for under five bucks or less. They said the reason for the 24.99 price tag is to support this game ( in which as of today they admit maybe in the future they will do so that is if they have the time). And while yes I'm sure every company wants to get a "paycheck" every week if your games don't produce enough sales to keep you going well that's your own tough luck. Let me put it this way. Company "a" has a game, it's about average really nothing outstanding by any means. The CEO of company "a" says hey lets sell this to other sites and let them determine the price. Three and half years latter company "a". Sells the game rights to company "s". Company "s" wants to make as much money off this game to support the guys at company "a" so they can make their new game for company "s". Problem is you see that company "a" has been selling this average game at a super low cost to everyone in the world. Company "s" says you should pay the high price for a game that is almost four years old this summer because company "a" needs the money to produce the new game in which company "s". Will demand a 40-50 price for. As a consumer I feel offended by this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Plain Ian

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

1. We set the price for release on Matrix and Slitherine based on the same price AGEOD had been charging through their online store. We matched their price, we did not exceed it. That's the part of the price-matching which I was referring to earlier. Per our pricing, if this were a new release this would be more like a $40 or $50 game, but we matched the existing price for the AGEOD store.

2. The strategy that Paradox was pursuing with the AGEOD titles was indeed getting them out to many, many distributors and they were being sold at much lower prices in many of those places. We completely understand why this looks like a positive thing from the customer's perspective. The problem is, this was actually hurting AGEOD - the result of all that activity and low prices meant that they were not making enough revenue. Our goal is to allow AGEOD to thrive and develop games for a long time to come. Those revenues are not now going to us or to AGEOD in all cases - we're still finding out about some of the places where the games were previously sent and working out what to do. We will honor and support all sales through any distributor, but if your interest is in supporting us or AGEOD please realize that purchasing from the AGEOD, Matrix or Slitherine stores is the best way to support future development.

3. The main reason for our pricing is to make sure that the developers within this niche, who make the kinds of games we all like to play, remain active and financially viable. It is our job as a publisher (and a developer as well) to make money for them and for us, which leads to the virtuous cycle where those games we all enjoy continue to get made. We have a lot of data, including data from AGEOD, that supports this pricing strategy as the best one for the health of this niche.

4. At $24.99 Pride of Nations is still very good value for the gaming dollar.

Regards,

- Erik

Ok last word on this because clearly no one is listening.

1. Thats false. Price at Ageod was £15.99 yesterday. Now its £17.99. Next week I assume it will be £21.59 to match Matrix?

2 and 3. I have no problems with this view. I actually support it.

4. Yes it is.... if you are paying in Dollars. You won't let me pay in Dollars? Instead I must use an exchange rate which bears no reality with whats happening in the real world.

The bottom line is a game which was made and distributed in Europe at reasonable prices has now been hijacked and UK buyers must pay inflated prices.
I really dread to see what price AACW 2 will be! I'm pretty sure that Ageod would have priced it in the £19.99 range......we can kiss that goodbye now.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

And this is the real tragedy ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

The price isn't going to change. No amount of complaining is going to change that.


What is far more important is:

Will I be able to get the DLC if I want them, being that I bought this when it came out?

What is the best way to play Russia?

And it's obvious that Matrix knows what it's doing. They're still here, unlike, say, SSI/Microprose.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

The game is clearly worth more then a one time sale price. I do not see the problem. 25 dollars is a fair price for this game. Those complaining, especially those that already own the game, can just ignore the price offered by matrix. You don't want to pay, don't buy.

I haven't bought this yet because I don't like AGEODs system of how games work. I have several of their games and none of them are intuitive or easy to work. That may change as the period interests me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

This is classic. He doesn't own the game and never played it but he is saying yep it's worth the price they are asking.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

The game is clearly worth more then a one time sale price. I do not see the problem. 25 dollars is a fair price for this game. Those complaining, especially those that already own the game, can just ignore the price offered by matrix. You don't want to pay, don't buy.

I haven't bought this yet because I don't like AGEODs system of how games work. I have several of their games and none of them are intuitive or easy to work. That may change as the period interests me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

And this is the real tragedy ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

The price isn't going to change. No amount of complaining is going to change that.


What is far more important is:

Will I be able to get the DLC if I want them, being that I bought this when it came out?

What is the best way to play Russia?

And it's obvious that Matrix knows what it's doing. They're still here, unlike, say, SSI/Microprose.

No tragedy on my end. I also thought that WiTE was too high in price. I bought it anyway. The only tragedy would be if I didn't buy it at all, as I would miss out on the best game of that conflict I ever played.