RE: CWDB Update (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios



Message

Barny23 -> RE: CWDB Update (3/5/2014 8:43:05 PM)

Hi :Sirius
All done :) -And well done.
You deserves some sleep now.

Those 76mm mk.26 turrets are the best looking i ever have seen.
Barny



Barny23 -> RE: CWDB Update (3/6/2014 5:38:35 AM)

Hi .Sirius

The last US Navy ship from me.

DD 825 Carpenter FRAM I Upgrade (#115-#759-#760)
Main guns only 1 twin 127mm turret.
That makes some sense.She had 2 turrets before upgrade one covered
by helo pad,leaving room for one in front of the ship
Barny

[image]local://upfiles/43318/A452FA49153045529F932175F7157DB0.jpg[/image]



Barny23 -> RE: CWDB Update (3/7/2014 6:19:55 AM)

Hi .Sirius

This Ship TCD Foudre (A646) later assigned the NATO side number L9020
No aircraft facilities please

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_ship_Foudre_(A646)
http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/12/1212.htm
Barny

[image]local://upfiles/43318/F13D55CEE62C409CB3F4659779221C03.jpg[/image]



Barny23 -> RE: CWDB Update (3/11/2014 12:26:29 PM)

Hi .Sirius

TCD Foudre (A646)
Better Picture showing open dock area
Barny

[image]local://upfiles/43318/87D60B0FD2F64C10B9BEF54CB4AF470F.jpg[/image]



.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (3/11/2014 7:46:43 PM)

Thanks Barny Ill update them after the next DB release



Barny23 -> RE: CWDB Update (3/13/2014 8:50:32 PM)

Hi .Sirius

This ship L177 it is , or better:
USS LST-177 was transferred to France and named RFS Laita (K05) later (L9001)

http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/16/160177.htm
Barny

[image]local://upfiles/43318/5736728109EF4357B3026209815DE351.jpg[/image]



Dobey455 -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (3/15/2014 5:02:52 PM)

Hi .Sirius

I have been working on a draft scenario and was unable to get some A-4G's to refuel in flight.
After a quick investigation I found they have no "probe refuelling" entry under "Properties" and suspect this is the issue. This is actually the case in both the CWDB and DB3000.

Is it possible to update this in a future DB release?

Thanks for all your work to date - the game just keeps getting better [&o]



.Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (3/15/2014 6:58:27 PM)

No probs will get onto it



.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (3/19/2014 12:16:54 PM)

All done
quote:

ORIGINAL: Barny

Hi .Sirius

This ship L177 it is , or better:
USS LST-177 was transferred to France and named RFS Laita (K05) later (L9001)

http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/16/160177.htm
Barny

[image]local://upfiles/43318/5736728109EF4357B3026209815DE351.jpg[/image]




.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (3/19/2014 12:17:17 PM)

All done
quote:

ORIGINAL: Barny

Hi .Sirius

TCD Foudre (A646)
Better Picture showing open dock area
Barny

[image]local://upfiles/43318/87D60B0FD2F64C10B9BEF54CB4AF470F.jpg[/image]




Coiler12 -> RE: CWDB Update (3/23/2014 4:12:29 PM)

Several never-were PRC planes:

Chengdu J-9 and its PL-4 missile.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/j-12.htm]J-12 STOL fighter.

H-8 Bomber

KJ-1 AEW



treez -> RE: CWDB Update (4/1/2014 5:56:47 PM)

Nuclear warhead W7, W31 or M-22 for MIM-14 Nike Hercules



.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (4/1/2014 6:53:46 PM)

Hi thanks on the to do list :)
quote:

ORIGINAL: treez

Nuclear warhead W7, W31 or M-22 for MIM-14 Nike Hercules




VFA41_Lion -> RE: CWDB Update (4/3/2014 4:50:49 PM)

Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]



.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (4/3/2014 5:12:41 PM)

Hi no problems will build the big mother of all Nukes
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]




VFA41_Lion -> RE: CWDB Update (4/3/2014 5:19:30 PM)

:D You guys are awesome.



.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (4/3/2014 5:26:05 PM)

Heh rumour has it we even have families and sleep too
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

:D You guys are awesome.




Sardaukar -> RE: CWDB Update (4/3/2014 8:37:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: .Sirius

Heh rumour has it we even have families and sleep too
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

:D You guys are awesome.




We don't believe in those rumours... [:D]



.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (4/4/2014 1:12:15 PM)

Hi I've built the 58 Mt version of the bomb, reading about it the fire ball radius was 3km and blast radius 38 km now thats a mega bomb explosion
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]




VFA41_Lion -> RE: CWDB Update (4/4/2014 1:42:33 PM)

[&o]
quote:

ORIGINAL: .Sirius

Hi I've built the 58 Mt version of the bomb, reading about it the fire ball radius was 3km and blast radius 38 km now thats a mega bomb explosion
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]






HudsonGame -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (4/5/2014 3:21:32 PM)

I see we now have World War II Japanese platforms. Very nice. I would like to see a few Royal Navy assets added. How about HMS Hood. Yes she did sink. What if she had not been sent to the bottom. The Battlecruiser HMS Tiger. Say no London or Washington Naval treaty. She could have easily been around in the late 1940s. Ships that were around post 1946 were HMS Nelson, HMS Rodney, HMS Renown, HMS Queen Elizabeth, and HMS Ramillies. Anyway, it would be nice if some of these ships were added to the Cold War Database.



rafale -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (4/11/2014 7:36:04 PM)

Hi,
is it possible to add D-21?
If yes, we will be able to repeat secret recon missions over Lob-Nor chinese nuclear site
but I have no idea how to make starting point in/from B-52 or SR-71

and about World War II Japanese platforms - is it possible to add Sen Toku class with Aichi M6A1 and bio-bombs "operation Hikari/Splendour"?

thanks for updating CMANO day by day



.Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (4/13/2014 7:57:54 AM)

Hi no problems on the D-21 and I'll look at the rest
quote:

ORIGINAL: rafale

Hi,
is it possible to add D-21?
If yes, we will be able to repeat secret recon missions over Lob-Nor chinese nuclear site
but I have no idea how to make starting point in/from B-52 or SR-71

and about World War II Japanese platforms - is it possible to add Sen Toku class with Aichi M6A1 and bio-bombs "operation Hikari/Splendour"?

thanks for updating CMANO day by day




.Sirius -> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests (4/13/2014 7:59:43 AM)

Hi HMS Warspite, Queen Elizabeth and Valiant added as they were in service or reserve until 1948 will look at the rest on a case by case basis
quote:

ORIGINAL: HudsonGame

I see we now have World War II Japanese platforms. Very nice. I would like to see a few Royal Navy assets added. How about HMS Hood. Yes she did sink. What if she had not been sent to the bottom. The Battlecruiser HMS Tiger. Say no London or Washington Naval treaty. She could have easily been around in the late 1940s. Ships that were around post 1946 were HMS Nelson, HMS Rodney, HMS Renown, HMS Queen Elizabeth, and HMS Ramillies. Anyway, it would be nice if some of these ships were added to the Cold War Database.




.Sirius -> RE: CWDB Update (4/17/2014 10:37:53 AM)

Muhahahaha just dropped a Tsar Bomba in a test blast radius in Command was 28nm !! yeah :)
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

[&o]
quote:

ORIGINAL: .Sirius

Hi I've built the 58 Mt version of the bomb, reading about it the fire ball radius was 3km and blast radius 38 km now thats a mega bomb explosion
quote:

ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion

Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]








.Sirius -> YB-49 (4/19/2014 10:21:00 AM)

Hi guys anyone fancy a Stealthy YB-49 and its off shoot YB-35 in the DB in that 1950's mood at the moment



Coiler12 -> RE: YB-49 (4/19/2014 1:22:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: .Sirius

Hi guys anyone fancy a Stealthy YB-49 and its off shoot YB-35 in the DB in that 1950's mood at the moment


I'm always up for some what-if hardware. [:)]



Hairog -> RE: YB-49 (4/21/2014 4:07:29 AM)

Wow this is amazing. Glad I dropped the $80. How about some more from 1946 including some "what if" weapons...

1. primitive SAM to stand in for the Wasserfal
2. primitive AA missile to stand in for the X4
3. MiG 9 Fargo
4. Yak 15 Feather
5. Tu2s Bat
6. Pe 8 that is a platform for the X4
7. RAF Meteor
8. Seehund mini sub



NickD -> RE: YB-49 (4/21/2014 5:06:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hairog
7. RAF Meteor


Is that different to the 1947-era Meteor Mk 4 which is currently in the CWDB? There's also a 1949-1951 MiG-9 and 1947-era Yak-15. [:)]



Coiler12 -> RE: YB-49 (4/25/2014 4:51:09 PM)

The "Generic Depth Charges" on Soviet vessels have far too great a range compared to the named ones on Western vessels.



Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.484375