rkr1958 -> RE: New to the game - Basic Questions (7/26/2014 6:24:47 PM)
|
I'm having a blasts playing through my first Global War Scenario! My question is: What does it take to conquer France? In my other strategic wargames, the capture of Paris will do. Though, in CEaW GS, the capture of Paris results in the French offer of an armistice to the German, which they can accept or refuse. If they accept, then France surrenders and Vichy is formed. If they (the Germans) refuse the armistice, the fighting continues with the surviving French forces join in with the British forces. I know ... I know ... I need to read through the books and I will. But honestly, playing the game and learning through playing is much more fun than reading through the books. Though, I do appreciate the books. I'd just rather be playing the game. [;)] In learning how to play a strategic wargame (i.e., MWiF (WiF) in this case), I like to play a game (or games) basically following the historical sequence. That is Poland-Denmark-Holland-Belgium then France, Yugoslavia-Greece and finally the USSR. Notice that I've left Norway out. My experience is that as the axis player the risks (and pain) of going after Norway far outweigh the potential gains of conquering it. Also, I've found that the resources diverted and potentially tied up in an Operation Wesenbung could, by far, be put to better use in Case Yellow (i.e., Holland-Belgium-France campaign). And what I understand about MWiF (or WiF), the same lesson applies. While I'm, with minor deviations (i.e., no Norway and no winter war against Finland), following the historical sequence in this game, I am not adhering to the timeline. For example, I easily conquered Poland in Sep/Oct '39, Denmark in Nov/Dec '39, Holland and Belgium in Jan/Feb '40 and launched my attack against France and the BEF in Mar/Apr 40. I would have attacked Denmark in Sep/Oct '39; but didn't get fair weather for the remainder of the turn after the 1st (and 2nd) impulse. Bad luck I know, but I got fair weather on the first two impulses of both the Nov/Dec '39 and Jan/Feb '40 turns in the west. Good luck. I also got fair weather on the first four impulses of the Mar/Apr '40 turn. What's impress me so far is how well the Germans have done with respect to the historical timeline of their conquests to date. And, it's only Mar/Apr '40 and the Germans have already broken through the allied lines and are at the outskirts of Paris. Through, I must admit this could be the result of my poor, or inexperience, defensive play. On the first axis impulse (2nd impulse overall) of this turn, I used an offensive chit and Rundstedt to double my ground attacks in order to break through in two places. These attacks outright destroyed two French corps and shatter two more. I also got lucky on a ground strike that disrupted Georges' HQ unit and a 5-2 reserve corps in a 3rd hex. Two BEF corps, which had move into Belgium just west of Antwerp, were at risk of being cutoff. All the British and French could do on their next, the 3rd impulse, was pull back and try to reestablish their defensive line. Which the Germans broke through again destroying George and 3 other French corps. With the French, and British, reeling for these attacks, Mussolini though it was a good time to enter the war and take what they could in the south. However; they rolled a 1 on their 4-1 attack against a French 2-3 corps in Nice. One thing, among many I'm sure, that I'm not doing very well is getting German u-boats into action against British convoys. Last impulse, which was #4, I did choose a combined for the Germans which allowed them to move 2 u-boat units to the Bay of Biscay. Though, both sides searches failed. This leads me to my second question: How do you, the experience players, make German u-boats the threat in MWiF (WiF) that they were in the real war? Now, while I've only discussed the War in Europe, the Japanese in China are making progress. It's slow and cumbersome but they seem to be making steady gains. I can see the difficulty Japan will have when they're at war with the US in a year and half (or so), balancing the priorities between naval and land operations. [image]local://upfiles/31901/E16BCE8E290746F9A9A3BCAA51553C1C.jpg[/image]
|
|
|
|