RE: Ulithi (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message


szmike -> RE: Ulithi (8/12/2014 10:33:14 PM)

[X(]
Thread of the year. [&o][:D]




warspite1 -> RE: Ulithi (8/13/2014 4:59:41 AM)

Some great pictures there. Love those of the South Dakota [&o]

The CV's all lined up I've seen before - still makes for one hell of an impressive site. An awesome display of sea power.....




obvert -> RE: Ulithi (8/13/2014 9:05:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

Port size in the game drives unload speeds and repair capability. While Ulithi was a vast, relatively safe anchorage, how much shore infrastructure was ever built? If you make it a 6 you're making it roughly a Brisbane, and that's nuts.


I disagree. To have that many ship in a "lagoon harbor" and being able to refuel, resupply and rearm them does give you the same capacity of a size 6 port. It is stupid to think you would just harbor ships there without having the ability to resupply them. Actually it is laughable.


In your haste to post a snarky response you have once again failed to grasp the points in question. So, one more time:

1. Port size in the game drives cargo load/unload rates. Supplies and fuel for storage at ashore facilities such as tank farms and warehouse complexes. Speed is a function of pier services and civilian longshoreman assets. Hence, Brisbane= fast, and a Port Level 0 atoll=slow. If you make the atoll the same level as Brisbane it becomes Brisbane on this measure. But it has no real estate to build those facilities.

2. Ship repair, which you ignore in the reply above, is also a function of port size, the other sources of repair points (naval, support, own-ship, tenders, yards) being equal. Port-based repair point generation is an abstraction of, again, ashore brick & mortar shops combined with a skilled civilian workforce. Brisbane has them, Ulithi does not. Although that guy in the breechclout in the OP's photos could be a skilled pipefitter I suppose. And that other guy in the breechclout might have superior underwater welding skills. Regardless, make Ulithi a Port Level 6, and they'll have to learn.



Sophistry! I suppose all the CB's on Ulithi does not equate to your ... "brick & mortar shops combined with a skilled civilian workforce". Ahem (ships were made from brick and motar, I thought they were steel[:'(])... Sir you have no idea what your talking about. The US Navy would not base the 3rd/5th Fleet at Ulithi if it could not maintain and supply them there. They did, so Ulithi and Brisbane must be and are effectively equal. One has docks while the other had 100's of small ships doing a similar task as dock. A means to transfer supplies.


Huh. So you're agreeing then that Ulithi should in fact be a lower port rating than Brisbane because most of the work is done by 100s of small ships. Those ships are in game, so instead of a higher port rating, you have to move the ships there. I don't mean the LSVP and other boats, I mean the support ships that did the work of repairing, supplying and maintaining the fleet.




PaxMondo -> RE: Ulithi (8/13/2014 2:08:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

I am in awe about this exemplary demonstration of inability to comprehend written language. Respect. [sm=Crazy-1271.gif]

+1

doesn't want to ....




Symon -> RE: Ulithi (8/13/2014 3:13:21 PM)

This is a Port.

[image]local://upfiles/43462/9B6233ACE2694060846EF9C3DC4F8B76.jpg[/image]




Symon -> RE: Ulithi (8/13/2014 3:13:59 PM)

This is the “Port” of Ulithi; Sorlen Island 1945. Note the vast scale, the extensive cargo handling, distribution, and storage facilities; the drydocks and repair piers; the fabrication shops; the fuel farms and power stations.

Giving it a 3:3 is unbelievably generous. It should be a 0:1. The “actual” base at Ulithi was the USN Service Squadron (1st Advanced Fleet Base), which was “ALL” afloat and could move to and set up anywhere. It picked Ulithi because of the sheer scale of the 100 foot, good holding bottom, protected anchorage footprint.

Obviously The Moose, Obvert, and others, know exactly what they are talking about.
[image]local://upfiles/43462/B8EFCBD092DF4D9EAB8733B17E498AF6.jpg[/image]




PaxMondo -> RE: Ulithi (8/14/2014 3:04:09 PM)

nice shots ... THANKS!




AW1Steve -> RE: Ulithi (8/14/2014 4:12:53 PM)

Symon has done , as usual, an outstanding job of making sense out of the mystifying. So I guess the only question in my mind is not if the port is equivalent to Brisbane or whatever, but can you indeed put the right mixture and number of service ships to bring it up to the capability that it had in reality (due to service squadron 10 + others)? [&:] I'm guessing yes.

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there? [&:][:)]




Symon -> RE: Ulithi (8/14/2014 5:08:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
Symon has done , as usual, an outstanding job of making sense out of the mystifying. So I guess the only question in my mind is not if the port is equivalent to Brisbane or whatever, but can you indeed put the right mixture and number of service ships to bring it up to the capability that it had in reality (due to service squadron 10 + others)? [&:] I'm guessing yes.

Just for grins, here’s Sorlen Island and North Anchorage without the 3rd or 5th Fleet in town. The ships are from R.Adm. P Hendren’s Service Squadron, So Pac Force. I see floating drydocks, AOs, AEs, ARs, hospital ships, supply and refrigerator ships, and a virtual cornucopia of LSTs (some specially configured as ARs, etc..) LCMs, Lighter As, Lighter Ds, etc.. The really big stuff was off the left edge of the photo, in the Pegeef/Asor corner. The fleet anchorages were off the right edge of the picture in the anchorages from MogMog to Eleute.

Don Bowen and I spent months making sure every single relevant ship was in the database and that the code would work with them, for exactly this contingency. Works a bit better in Babes, but it's there for Stock as well.
quote:

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there? [&:][:)]

I don't know, but from the nature of your question, I think you do. I would really like to know that. I'm sure Don would like to know that too.

[image]local://upfiles/43462/76C2DD700B9C4B4B993A25236066DFBD.jpg[/image]




urtel -> RE: Ulithi (8/14/2014 6:44:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there? [&:][:)]



USS Mississinewa AO-59, sunk by jap mini sub...




AW1Steve -> RE: Ulithi (8/14/2014 7:29:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: urtel


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there? [&:][:)]



USS Mississinewa AO-59, sunk by jap mini sub...


Absolutely correct![&o][&o][&o]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Mississinewa_(AO-59)




Mundy -> RE: Ulithi (8/14/2014 10:21:24 PM)

The ppt file linked to on Wiki is very interesting on how they got the oil out of the wreck. < 5 gallons released.

Ed-




wdolson -> RE: Ulithi (8/15/2014 10:58:24 PM)

I think these guys are charging outrageous prices for their films, but the previews are free. This is a flyover of Ulithi while the 3rd fleet was at anchor:

http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675037790_United-States-5th-fleet_anchored-ships_mother-ship_hospital-ship




rjopel -> RE: Ulithi (8/17/2014 6:47:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson

I think these guys are charging outrageous prices for their films, but the previews are free. This is a flyover of Ulithi while the 3rd fleet was at anchor:

http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675037790_United-States-5th-fleet_anchored-ships_mother-ship_hospital-ship



Especially since the films they are showing are in the Public Domain as US Government films.




wdolson -> RE: Ulithi (8/17/2014 11:17:53 PM)

I found some footage my father's unit shot on Attu on their site. My father was able to identify some footage he shot and spotted some names he remembered. I'm not paying their prices for the footage though.

Bill




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.671875