RE: Scots Are they free (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


warspite1 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/17/2014 8:38:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I realise this is no comfort to those who agree with you, but this really is David Cameron's fault.

warspite1

What!!?? A Scot blaming the Tories? Whatever next? [:D]

Seriously though, that does not surprise me one bit. The way the whole no campaign has been run has been total and utter bollocks.

Shameful [sm=nono.gif]


It was Better Together's to win...it was thrown away. I think it would likely have come back at some point - but it was there to win this time around and the win was discarded.

warspite1

I don't know whether it was there or not - you probably know better than me (although I would not be surprised if the pollsters are totally wrong and its a comfortable victory in the end).

What I do know is human nature. Tell a free person he can choose Yes or No.

He/she decides, you know what I'm not sure? so I will play safe and vote for what I know and vote No.

Then some idiot decides to feed you whole manner of horror stories about the price of groceries to the amount of oil to the moving south of banks - effectively saying you have no choice but to vote NO. Guess what? Said person is now more likely to vote Yes than ever they were.

Why leave arguments - many perfectly sound - until the last minute so that they feel like threats, designed to frighten people into voting one way?? Yeah great work.....




JudgeDredd -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/17/2014 8:42:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

Thank you mr. W. I can tell that this effects not only you but many others very deeply.
warspite1

Yes it really does. I was brought up by my mum to be British - not English (that sentiment came later for certain reasons). My mum, a history buff, fought for her country in the war, her country and its history meant so much to her, and she passed that love of nation to me.

I cannot tell you how upset I am at the thought of the United Kingdom no longer existing on Friday. Its absolutely heartbreaking.

I am genuinely saddened to read this. I am sorry that you will feel you have lost your identify (if only in part) - but I have to say - I do not and have never had that sense of Britishness. Not even when I was in the forces.

warspite1

Thank-you JD.


You never know Warspite1 - it might well stay as is. It's not over till the fat lady sings. Part of me hopes so for people like you who genuinely feel that way - but there is that other part of me I'm afraid.

Either way - I will not be running about bragging about a YES. Even if there's a NO result, life will go on...

Peace [&o]




warspite1 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/17/2014 8:48:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

Thank you mr. W. I can tell that this effects not only you but many others very deeply.
warspite1

Yes it really does. I was brought up by my mum to be British - not English (that sentiment came later for certain reasons). My mum, a history buff, fought for her country in the war, her country and its history meant so much to her, and she passed that love of nation to me.

I cannot tell you how upset I am at the thought of the United Kingdom no longer existing on Friday. Its absolutely heartbreaking.

I am genuinely saddened to read this. I am sorry that you will feel you have lost your identify (if only in part) - but I have to say - I do not and have never had that sense of Britishness. Not even when I was in the forces.

warspite1

Thank-you JD.


You never know Warspite1 - it might well stay as is. It's not over till the fat lady sings. Part of me hopes so for people like you who genuinely feel that way - but there is that other part of me I'm afraid.

Either way - I will not be running about bragging about a YES. Even if there's a NO result, life will go on...

Peace [&o]

warspite1

Yes - peace to you too [sm=00000436.gif] If its a Yes you can buy me a pint of Carling - if its No, I'll get you whatever you're having.

In the meantime, and for the little time there is likely to be left, I give you:

The 2nd Cavalry "Union" Brigade at Waterloo - An English, Irish and Scottish Regiment fighting together [&o]




[image]local://upfiles/28156/58339B0B5C7343CB8C3B194A1A74A0FC.jpg[/image]




radic202 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/17/2014 11:06:37 PM)


For those interested in articles and opinions on the Scottish vote from the other side of the pond:

Scotland independence vote could be as close as Quebec referendum: Éric Grenier: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/scotland-independence-vote-could-be-as-close-as-quebec-referendum-%C3%A9ric-grenier-1.2768093

Gang remember (and not wanting to repeat myself but) I went through this twice in 1980 and 1995.




Bill Durrant -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:10:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

However, I don't think i've met anyone who wishes they could go back to the days of lesser independence.


Oh? You've not spoken to most Russians then? [;)]

ETA: To whit:

It's a sort of cognitive dissonance that most people that wanted independence are unlikely to fairly gauge 'what could have been' had a union been maintained. I think they're far more likely to see what novel things they now have than what they've lost forevermore-particularly if the latter is esoteric (global influence, relevance, etc).

I also think there's a different perspective depending on whether you're the 'winner' of independence or the 'loser' of that province / nation state from your union.

Lastly, are there many Russian speakers in Scotland? There may be precedence for someone somewhere giving succor to Russian speakers that are yearning for independence in that area. [;)]

[other stuff written and redacted]


Fair point. No Russians. I think the matter at hand is about the ostensibly ruling factor understanding the desire of the independence seeker - and understanding why they feel independence is a better and viable option. As some one who regards myself as first, British, I do understand why some factions of a 'Union' or 'Empire' wish to stand on their own two feet without outside influence.




Chickenboy -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:11:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
An English, Irish and Scottish Regiment fighting together [&o]


Well, it's to be expected, really. Put an Irish, Scottish and English regiment in the same proximity and a fracas is bound to be started.

[looks at picture again]

Oh....fighting together on the same side? You're right, old bean, that is unusual! [;)]




Chickenboy -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:22:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

However, I don't think i've met anyone who wishes they could go back to the days of lesser independence.


Oh? You've not spoken to most Russians then? [;)]

ETA: To whit:

It's a sort of cognitive dissonance that most people that wanted independence are unlikely to fairly gauge 'what could have been' had a union been maintained. I think they're far more likely to see what novel things they now have than what they've lost forevermore-particularly if the latter is esoteric (global influence, relevance, etc).

I also think there's a different perspective depending on whether you're the 'winner' of independence or the 'loser' of that province / nation state from your union.

Lastly, are there many Russian speakers in Scotland? There may be precedence for someone somewhere giving succor to Russian speakers that are yearning for independence in that area. [;)]

[other stuff written and redacted]


Fair point. No Russians. I think the matter at hand is about the ostensibly ruling factor understanding the desire of the independence seeker - and understanding why they feel independence is a better and viable option. As some one who regards myself as first, British, I do understand why some factions of a 'Union' or 'Empire' wish to stand on their own two feet without outside influence.


For the self-identified British out there, the prospect of a dissolution (even a voluntary one) of the United Kingdom has got to be a blow.

As an American, the prospect of a state seceding from the union is unfathomable. It simply wouldn't be allowed or considered. There is no legal Constitutional or other method for it and it would be uniformly opposed by all-by force of arms if necessary. At least that's the way that it worked out the last time.

These polls or 'joke ballots' that you see about state "x" seceding from the Union over here are just that-expressions of annoyance with the Federal government. Blowing off steam and letting our opinions of state mistrust of Federal authority be known.

I'm just surprised a bit by how comparatively 'easy' this march to breakup appears to be in the UK. It looks as if the road has been paved and made level for the 'yes' vote to succeed. The Union in the UK seems comparatively less cohesive by its structure than our states over here. Not being judgemental-there's all sorts of different mechanisms for unions-I just didn't realize how comparatively easy this process is in the UK




Bill Durrant -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:32:53 AM)

Hmmm - I do understand your point. I think that times have changed and situations are a bit different. The 19th and early 20th Century were hotbeds of nationalism which aren't so relevant now in such a global atmosphere.

Also, is the point I mentioned earlier, areas craving independence on economic, religious or economic grounds. I do not condone manic independence for independence sake but Scotland does have an historic tradition that makes itself an historic nation with an historical nation identity far, far beyond many more recent unions.

Edit: But. yes, it would be a blow




Chickenboy -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:41:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

Hmmm - I do understand your point. I think that times have changed and situations are a bit different. The 19th and early 20th Century were hotbeds of nationalism which aren't so relevant now in such a global atmosphere.

Also, is the point I mentioned earlier, areas craving independence on economic, religious or economic grounds. I do not condone manic independence for independence sake but Scotland does have an historic tradition that makes itself an historic nation with an historical nation identity far, far beyond many more recent unions.

Edit: But. yes, it would be a blow


Aye, but couldn't you argue that Scotland's nationalistic quest for independence in the 21st century is rather relevant here? In such a global atmosphere, it (Scottish independence) seems all the more irrelevant.




Bill Durrant -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:48:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Durrant

Hmmm - I do understand your point. I think that times have changed and situations are a bit different. The 19th and early 20th Century were hotbeds of nationalism which aren't so relevant now in such a global atmosphere.

Also, is the point I mentioned earlier, areas craving independence on economic, religious or economic grounds. I do not condone manic independence for independence sake but Scotland does have an historic tradition that makes itself an historic nation with an historical nation identity far, far beyond many more recent unions.

Edit: But. yes, it would be a blow


Aye, but couldn't you argue that Scotland's nationalistic quest for independence in the 21st century is rather relevant here? In such a global atmosphere, it (Scottish independence) seems all the more irrelevant.


Quite right CB. That is the question that people in Scotland have to decide today. The vote has only been triggered by two consecutive elections where the majority (in our electoral terms) elected a Nationalist Party. Now it is a straight majority decision as to whether that is really what they want.




rodney727 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 3:29:02 AM)

If hated rivals Iowa&Minnesota can fight the enemy side by side heck anyone can![:D]
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
An English, Irish and Scottish Regiment fighting together [&o]


Well, it's to be expected, really. Put an Irish, Scottish and English regiment in the same proximity and a fracas is bound to be started.

[looks at picture again]

Oh....fighting together on the same side? You're right, old bean, that is unusual! [;)]





JudgeDredd -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 6:53:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
An English, Irish and Scottish Regiment fighting together [&o]


Well, it's to be expected, really. Put an Irish, Scottish and English regiment in the same proximity and a fracas is bound to be started.

[looks at picture again]

Oh....fighting together on the same side? You're right, old bean, that is unusual! [;)]

To be fair, I think they probably were fighting between themselves and the French got caught up in it...that's when Britain really gels together. [:D]

On a serious note, I do hope (after whatever animosity there might be) that they continue to work together when it's appropriate and ethically correct to do so.




gradenko2k -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 10:33:09 AM)

So have any CMANO scenarios come out of this yet? Defending the GIUK gap without Stornoway, intercepting landings into Oslo and Narvik without assets from Scapa Flow, escorting REFORGER convoys that have to go straight into French ports (or weren't they already supposed to do this), etc?




aaatoysandmore -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 1:24:13 PM)

Go Scots Grey's vote YES on your ballots today. FREEEEDOMMMMM [:D]




wodin -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 3:19:29 PM)

If I was Scottish I would vote independence..but as someone in England I say please don't go otherwise we will be stuck with a tory government for ever!!!




Toby42 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 3:26:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

If I was Scottish I would vote independence..but as someone in England I say please don't go otherwise we will be stuck with a tory government for ever!!!


I'm not familiar with British political parties. Are Tories liberal or conservative?




Cataphract88 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 3:42:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Treale


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

If I was Scottish I would vote independence..but as someone in England I say please don't go otherwise we will be stuck with a tory government for ever!!!


I'm not familiar with British political parties. Are Tories liberal or conservative?


To be honest, there isn't that much difference nowadays. [:)]




JudgeDredd -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 3:52:12 PM)

A little bit of light heartedness

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2BKrh43rhI




JudgeDredd -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 3:56:56 PM)

Warspite1 - you've thrown a rock right throw my window!

I was pretty sure I was going to be elated if it was a yes vote...but after reading your very heartfelt post, I am actually going to have very mixed feelings tomorrow. [&:]

If YES win, I'll be elated but I will genuinely feel for people like yourself who will have a feeling of losing something [&o]
If NO win, I'll be gutted it's the second time Scotland will have chucked this opportunity away - but I'll be happy for you, my mother (who also feels British) and others all over the country. [&o]

Whatever happens - I'm done. It'll happen or it won't and I'll be very confused tomorrow.

I kind of hope you get what you want...but not...that's how confused I am. [:'(]

Anyway - peace to you all. I hope whatever happens we all get on after [&o]




berto -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 4:21:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

Whatever happens - I'm done. It'll happen or it won't and I'll be very confused tomorrow.

But is it done?

So if there's a NO vote today, what's to stop the pro-YES forces from scheduling a vote next year, the year after that, ..., year after year until the tide ultimately turns their way or one year they just get lucky?

It's a one-way ratchet, right? And what's to stop separatists from keep trying that ratchet until it takes, and locks in place?

If so, isn't independence happening sooner or later? And if so, why not now, just to get it over and done with?




TulliusDetritus -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 4:30:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Treale


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

If I was Scottish I would vote independence..but as someone in England I say please don't go otherwise we will be stuck with a tory government for ever!!!


I'm not familiar with British political parties. Are Tories liberal or conservative?


Scots tend to vote the left parties (if Labour can be called left). Scotland out => UK (without Scotland) lose a lot of "left" votes ergo the right *wins* [:D]




wodin -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 4:42:59 PM)

Yep Tories are Conservatives.




rodney727 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 5:05:47 PM)

I have a feeling that tomorrow we will be waking up with a new independent country. There is a reason the Romans couldn't defeat Scotland. I didn't realize this before but the Scots are not a Germanic tribe like the English, like it really matter now but it helps me to understand the basic need for independence. On the other hand after 300+ years you would think living on the same island you would mesh with each other. Talk about being stubborn lol![:D]




JudgeDredd -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 5:22:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: berto


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

Whatever happens - I'm done. It'll happen or it won't and I'll be very confused tomorrow.

But is it done?

So if there's a NO vote today, what's to stop the pro-YES forces from scheduling a vote next year, the year after that, ..., year after year until the tide ultimately turns their way or one year they just get lucky?

It's a one-way ratchet, right? And what's to stop separatists from keep trying that ratchet until it takes, and locks in place?

If so, isn't independence happening sooner or later? And if so, why not now, just to get it over and done with?

No - the votes are being counted overnight and barring any recounts or issues getting the votes in (from the islands for example), the result should be known by 7am Friday morning.

If there's a NO vote life will go on. I doubt "independence" will die off...but it will go away for a while at least...especially IF the government come good on the powers they have offered Scotland (which I personally thought was an insult to the rest of the UK).

There wouldn't be a vote year after year. If it's a no vote, I reckon it might be 10-30 years before there may be a drive for it again (the last try was in 1979). It costs too much and a referendum would have to be ratified I think by Westminster. I totally think Cameron and his band thought it would be a NO vote (that the time for independence wasn't right) and was willing to give the referendum, though I don't know if he had to anyway - as Salmond and the SNP were majority elected based on their promise of pushing for a referendum. In fact - the fact there has been mass panic by all 3 leaders shows that they most definitely were sitting on their haunches celebrating - and then realised it was a wee bit closer than they thought. Absolute shame on them. If Scotland is lost to the Union tomorrow - it falls squarely in the lap of Westminster imo. They have been lackadaisical at best and downright incompetent at worst.

However - if it is a NO vote, maybe next time Westminster will realise the totally mess they made this time around and let Devo-Max be on the paper - that would make Independence go away for another 20 or 30 years and I genuinely believe if Devo-Max was on the ballot Paper now, the Scots would have went for that. That would've given Scotland full fiscal control with monies being paid to Westminster and Scotland would still be a part of the Union. Currently Scotland hands all money to Westminster and Westminster sends money back up.




wodin -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 5:31:39 PM)

Funny thing is the Scottish get a better deal per head than the English..and if it's a no vote it will get even better.




Toby42 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 6:03:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Treale


quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

If I was Scottish I would vote independence..but as someone in England I say please don't go otherwise we will be stuck with a tory government for ever!!!


I'm not familiar with British political parties. Are Tories liberal or conservative?


Scots tend to vote the left parties (if Labour can be called left). Scotland out => UK (without Scotland) lose a lot of "left" votes ergo the right *wins* [:D]


I would have thought that the Scots were a conservative bunch?




loki100 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 6:22:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

Warspite1 - you've thrown a rock right throw my window!

I was pretty sure I was going to be elated if it was a yes vote...but after reading your very heartfelt post, I am actually going to have very mixed feelings tomorrow. [&:]

If YES win, I'll be elated but I will genuinely feel for people like yourself who will have a feeling of losing something [&o]
If NO win, I'll be gutted it's the second time Scotland will have chucked this opportunity away - but I'll be happy for you, my mother (who also feels British) and others all over the country. [&o]

Whatever happens - I'm done. It'll happen or it won't and I'll be very confused tomorrow.

I kind of hope you get what you want...but not...that's how confused I am. [:'(]

Anyway - peace to you all. I hope whatever happens we all get on after [&o]


wonderful post and well said ...


quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

There is a reason the Romans couldn't defeat Scotland. I didn't realize this before but the Scots are not a Germanic tribe like the English, like it really matter now but it helps me to understand the basic need for independence.


.... err Lowland Scots which is either a language in its own right, or a very strong dialect of English, and spoken (to a greater or lesser degree) across Lowland Scotland is actually grounded on medieval German (its actually what English would be if it hadn't absorbed so much French). Doric (Aberdeen) and the dialects of Orkney and Shetlands are actually close to Norwegian ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

Funny thing is the Scottish get a better deal per head than the English..and if it's a no vote it will get even better.


well we do pay for it fully in taxes collected from Scotland, we contribute about 9.6% of the UK's GNP and about 9.3% of expenditure can be identified as being spent in Scotland. Check out the various GERS (Govt expenditure and revenue: Scotland) reports.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Treale

I would have thought that the Scots were a conservative bunch?


In a way the reason for this referendum is that Scotland has ended up having more in common politically and socially with social democratic Scandinavia than with the parties that run the UK Govt.

Should add, esp in Scotland the concept of *liberal* in a party sense has 2 meanings. One group are more or less the normal right of centre economically, left of centre socially that are to be found across the UK. The other group have their roots in the presbytyrian non-comformism that is still quite powerful in places like the islands off the West Coast and some regions in the north. The two don't really have much in common but a series of mergers sort of ended up with them in the same party.

So among the strands of politics here is a socially very conservative, but on other ways quite radical tinge. Their motto is more or less 'I bow my knee to no man but god' ... when formulated in the seventeenth century that was the stuff of revolution (& enduring top of the line misogyny ... thank you John Knox for that part of Scotland's social legacy)




PipFromSlitherine -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 7:24:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

Warspite1 - you've thrown a rock right throw my window!

I was pretty sure I was going to be elated if it was a yes vote...but after reading your very heartfelt post, I am actually going to have very mixed feelings tomorrow. [&:]

If YES win, I'll be elated but I will genuinely feel for people like yourself who will have a feeling of losing something [&o]
If NO win, I'll be gutted it's the second time Scotland will have chucked this opportunity away - but I'll be happy for you, my mother (who also feels British) and others all over the country. [&o]

Whatever happens - I'm done. It'll happen or it won't and I'll be very confused tomorrow.

I kind of hope you get what you want...but not...that's how confused I am. [:'(]

Anyway - peace to you all. I hope whatever happens we all get on after [&o]


wonderful post and well said ...


quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

There is a reason the Romans couldn't defeat Scotland. I didn't realize this before but the Scots are not a Germanic tribe like the English, like it really matter now but it helps me to understand the basic need for independence.


.... err Lowland Scots which is either a language in its own right, or a very strong dialect of English, and spoken (to a greater or lesser degree) across Lowland Scotland is actually grounded on medieval German (its actually what English would be if it hadn't absorbed so much French). Doric (Aberdeen) and the dialects of Orkney and Shetlands are actually close to Norwegian ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

Funny thing is the Scottish get a better deal per head than the English..and if it's a no vote it will get even better.


well we do pay for it fully in taxes collected from Scotland, we contribute about 9.6% of the UK's GNP and about 9.3% of expenditure can be identified as being spent in Scotland. Check out the various GERS (Govt expenditure and revenue: Scotland) reports.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Treale

I would have thought that the Scots were a conservative bunch?


In a way the reason for this referendum is that Scotland has ended up having more in common politically and socially with social democratic Scandinavia than with the parties that run the UK Govt.

Should add, esp in Scotland the concept of *liberal* in a party sense has 2 meanings. One group are more or less the normal right of centre economically, left of centre socially that are to be found across the UK. The other group have their roots in the presbytyrian non-comformism that is still quite powerful in places like the islands off the West Coast and some regions in the north. The two don't really have much in common but a series of mergers sort of ended up with them in the same party.

So among the strands of politics here is a socially very conservative, but on other ways quite radical tinge. Their motto is more or less 'I bow my knee to no man but god' ... when formulated in the seventeenth century that was the stuff of revolution (& enduring top of the line misogyny ... thank you John Knox for that part of Scotland's social legacy)

GERS is indeed pretty clear:

quote:


In 2012-13, total Scottish non-North Sea public sector revenue was estimated at £47.6 billion, (8.2% of total UK non-North Sea revenue). Including a per capita share of North Sea revenue, total Scottish public sector revenue was estimated at £48.1 billion (8.2% of UK total public sector revenue). When an illustrative geographical share of North Sea revenue is included, total Scottish public sector revenue was estimated at £53.1 billion (9.1% of UK total public sector revenue).

In 2012-13, total public sector expenditure for the benefit of Scotland by the UK Government, Scottish Government and all other parts of the public sector, plus a per capita share of UK debt interest payments, was £65.2 billion. This is equivalent to 9.3% of total UK public sector expenditure.


So that even with the (heavily pro-Yes) geographical share of the oil money, 9.1% of revenue, but took 9.3% of expenditure. Otherwise 8.2% revenue, 9.3% expenditure.
http://scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2014/03/7888

So not sure where your figures are from, perhaps you can cite them.

Cheers

Pip





warspite1 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 7:32:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PipFromSlitherine


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

Warspite1 - you've thrown a rock right throw my window!

I was pretty sure I was going to be elated if it was a yes vote...but after reading your very heartfelt post, I am actually going to have very mixed feelings tomorrow. [&:]

If YES win, I'll be elated but I will genuinely feel for people like yourself who will have a feeling of losing something [&o]
If NO win, I'll be gutted it's the second time Scotland will have chucked this opportunity away - but I'll be happy for you, my mother (who also feels British) and others all over the country. [&o]

Whatever happens - I'm done. It'll happen or it won't and I'll be very confused tomorrow.

I kind of hope you get what you want...but not...that's how confused I am. [:'(]

Anyway - peace to you all. I hope whatever happens we all get on after [&o]


wonderful post and well said ...


quote:

ORIGINAL: rogo727

There is a reason the Romans couldn't defeat Scotland. I didn't realize this before but the Scots are not a Germanic tribe like the English, like it really matter now but it helps me to understand the basic need for independence.


.... err Lowland Scots which is either a language in its own right, or a very strong dialect of English, and spoken (to a greater or lesser degree) across Lowland Scotland is actually grounded on medieval German (its actually what English would be if it hadn't absorbed so much French). Doric (Aberdeen) and the dialects of Orkney and Shetlands are actually close to Norwegian ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

Funny thing is the Scottish get a better deal per head than the English..and if it's a no vote it will get even better.


well we do pay for it fully in taxes collected from Scotland, we contribute about 9.6% of the UK's GNP and about 9.3% of expenditure can be identified as being spent in Scotland. Check out the various GERS (Govt expenditure and revenue: Scotland) reports.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Treale

I would have thought that the Scots were a conservative bunch?


In a way the reason for this referendum is that Scotland has ended up having more in common politically and socially with social democratic Scandinavia than with the parties that run the UK Govt.

Should add, esp in Scotland the concept of *liberal* in a party sense has 2 meanings. One group are more or less the normal right of centre economically, left of centre socially that are to be found across the UK. The other group have their roots in the presbytyrian non-comformism that is still quite powerful in places like the islands off the West Coast and some regions in the north. The two don't really have much in common but a series of mergers sort of ended up with them in the same party.

So among the strands of politics here is a socially very conservative, but on other ways quite radical tinge. Their motto is more or less 'I bow my knee to no man but god' ... when formulated in the seventeenth century that was the stuff of revolution (& enduring top of the line misogyny ... thank you John Knox for that part of Scotland's social legacy)

GERS is indeed pretty clear:

quote:


In 2012-13, total Scottish non-North Sea public sector revenue was estimated at £47.6 billion, (8.2% of total UK non-North Sea revenue). Including a per capita share of North Sea revenue, total Scottish public sector revenue was estimated at £48.1 billion (8.2% of UK total public sector revenue). When an illustrative geographical share of North Sea revenue is included, total Scottish public sector revenue was estimated at £53.1 billion (9.1% of UK total public sector revenue).

In 2012-13, total public sector expenditure for the benefit of Scotland by the UK Government, Scottish Government and all other parts of the public sector, plus a per capita share of UK debt interest payments, was £65.2 billion. This is equivalent to 9.3% of total UK public sector expenditure.


So that even with the (heavily pro-Yes) geographical share of the oil money, 9.1% of revenue, but took 9.3% of expenditure. Otherwise 8.2% revenue, 9.3% expenditure.
http://scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2014/03/7888

So not sure where your figures are from, perhaps you can cite them.

Cheers

Pip


warspite1

It sounds like one of those measures you can calculate a million different ways. As I've said, I think we will only really know once the two separate countries announce their budgets and we see what becomes of the various promises made. Only one thing for certain, Salmond and Cameron can't both be right....




warspite1 -> RE: Scots Are they free (9/18/2014 7:40:13 PM)

Someone mentioned the Scots Greys earlier. Is there a finer war picture?

Scotland Forever [&o]

[image]local://upfiles/28156/46D2EEC9F98549BD83065BDB2B1ADDF6.jpg[/image]




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.78125