bo -> RE: Misunderstood (10/1/2014 6:03:28 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Omnius bo, Sorry for misunderstanding your playful jibe. I was enjoying my game this evening until I found a ground support bug that forces me to go back to the land combat declaration phase and redo the land combats and ground supports. I think it didn't like my flying strategic bombers on extended range since that is the first time I've ever done that and it's the first time I've had this problem with ground supports. I used to do beta testing so I understand how you get hung up in stop and start. I started the Brute Force scenario with the intent of playing extra innings as they say in baseball vernacular. After wailing away as the Axis it's now fun getting to turn the tables. I didn't use the oil rules so I could enjoy this game after getting frustrated in my first one of Global War. I definitely have learned a lot about the game mechanics. Omnius Cool, how do you find the time to go into 1946. What side do you lean towards, I know myself I lean towards the Axis side because it is the Germans who set the pace, at least early on, I rarely test Global War, I test Fascist Tide all the time and Guadalcanal some of the time looking for problems with carrier air battles, digression AA fire etc. You will really like Fascist Tide when Steve gets it up an running. I am fortunate to be able to test it and I feel it runs pretty smooth, I think what might be holding it up is the production phase of the scenario.
|
|
|
|