(REVISED) Operation Balpara 2019 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios



Message


cf_dallas -> (REVISED) Operation Balpara 2019 (12/29/2014 8:56:50 PM)

New scenario for testing... very limited use of Lua, since I did most of the build prior to V1.06 release.

Let me know what you think!!!

*******************************

01 February 2019


The island of Sumba, in Indonesia, has been torn by growing ethnic and anti-Western violence. Increasingly well-organized militias have been targeting Indonesian government facilities, outside business interests, tourists, and the civilian population.

Indonesia’s ambassador to the United Nations requested assistance on January 25; The Indonesian President formally and specifically requested Australian armed assistance on January 27. The President hasn’t been seen in public since and subsequent official statements on the situation have been issued from office of the Indonesian Minister of Defense. These statements have been contradictory and stress the internal nature of the conflict.

The militia is not executing civilians wholesale right now, but their public declarations and demands have been growing more strident. The militias are known to have captured at least one heavy weapons depot; any other assistance they are receiving is unknown, though its suspected that the Indonesian military is complicit in their activities and may be passing intelligence. It’s possible that the Indonesian military will act to defend the militias, their intentions are unknown.

The issue of intervention has stalled in the UN Security Council along predictable lines: the United States willing to intervene, France and Great Britain somewhat less so, and Russia and China holding to their long-held stance that nations internal struggles are no business of the UN.

While the UN debates and decides, the Australian govermnet has determined that the Indonesian request for assistance on January 27 is all the mandate that’s needed. On the 28th HMAS Brisbane left Sydney, while HMAS Canberra put to sea from Perth three days ago with an amphibious contingent and an airwing that includes four brand new F-35Bs. Additional assets are available at airbases in northwest Australia. Allied support is not expected.

Your task is to:
- Limit civilian casualties, either from milita action or by collateral damage.
- Identify and eliminate militia forces on Sumba.
- Land Australian troops on Sumba, taking control of both airports and starting the landing of an amphibious regiment.
- Defend deployed Australian assets.

Total Units: >500 units total; 11 ships, 2 subs, 75 aircraft in player control
Scenario Time: 52 hours

Designer’s Note 1: This scenario started with this article (https://medium.com/war-is-boring/australia-is-getting-aircraft-carriers-sort-of-294519a756ca) and got more impetus from this article (https://www.aspi.org.au/publications/strategic-insights-78-jump-jets-for-the-adf). More discussion on the topic here: (http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3742676). The question at hand is, would a handful of F-35Bs add anything meaningful to the Canberra’s air wing?

Designer’s Note 2: There are a lot of civilians running around… ground traffic and buildings, air traffic, maritime traffic. Identify the target before you pull the trigger!

Designer’s Note 3: I started this under Build 573, I already had most of the event structure built when 1.06 came out, and I am a TERRIBLE coder… so there’s little use of Lua. Hopefully in subsequent releases I can add to it.


EDIT: Release 6 is the latest and greatest.




tommo8993 -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (12/30/2014 12:24:14 PM)

Played a bit into it, not fired a shot yet but plan to play more later. Looks a great scenario.




gbethel -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/4/2015 6:36:00 PM)

I played it all the way through. Congratulations, you have done a very good job.

The only issue/problem I had was starting off the first time. I created an ASW patrol area for group Canberra. When I set the way points as relative I failed to realize that there were some objective waypoints on the island for LZ's that were also active. As the group moved so did the LZ way points. This totally screwed up my first attempt. To prevent this from happening with anyone else I recommend locking the LZ reference points and deselecting them.

There are some other things I noticed that could improve the scenario or make it more challenging.

1. Stationing the Sukhois on a base closer to Sumba. They normally light up their AB's and are bingo before they get to Sumba.

2. Placing some MANPAD's in the LZ's would make things more difficult.

3. There are some scattered groups that never factored into the scenario. The Brisbane group and the allies group. Maybe removing them will make the scenario run faster.







tommo8993 -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/4/2015 6:39:53 PM)

Yeah, I didnt really use the subs or any other ships just the Canberra group.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/4/2015 11:56:29 PM)

Good feedback, I'm glad you liked it.... anyone else? Anyone get any unpleasant surprises?

I put in the Brisbane because in my limited testing, the Hobart nearly ran itself out of SAMs fighting in to the area, though admittedly I wasnt using the land based air at all. The allied group is the last remnant of the "color" I put into the background... color that soaked up a lot of processing. :-)

I'll make some tweaks and let you know when I've got an update ready.




Maromak -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/5/2015 3:26:43 AM)

Hi. Sorry this scenario is on my 'to play' list but haven't got to it yet. Thanks for your work.




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/5/2015 4:00:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cf_dallas

Good feedback, I'm glad you liked it.... anyone else? Anyone get any unpleasant surprises?


I'm really enjoying it so far and wanted to share my thoughts but I'm not quiet there yet. Please give me one more day! [:D]

Supreme




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/5/2015 7:07:43 PM)

Take your time... I've got a 60-hour-per week job and a one year old daughter, so I probably won't be making any changes right away. :-)




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/6/2015 3:28:41 PM)

Ok, I'm not through yet but here's something like an interim assessment...
First off, excellent work! I'm playing since 3 days as much as time permits and its still a lot of fun to return and having operations going on. This may not be the usual thing to mention here but the setup of the ships and subs in the scenario looks successful. Everything feels like being in the right place (even the Brisbane Task Group). IMAO placing sea assets in the right place has a huge impact on how the scenario evolves, especially with bigger scenarios.

1. First thing I'd suggest changing are the loadouts of the F-35Bs aboard HMAS Canberra. They start off with air-to-air loadouts which is rather rare in practise, given its role as a strike element aboard a LHD (further, there are no air threats in the beginning of the scen). Maybe you can give them some sort of air-to-ground laodout? In my case these F-35Bs were the first thing that hit Sumba and having them available with something to drop on the enemy right from the start would be cool.

2. Having some 3-4 CH-47F aboard HMAS Canberra wouldn't hurt the scenario. (look the picture -->http://www.navy.gov.au/fleet/ships-boats-craft/lhd)

3. You could clean up the map by making all single-unit airports - non-essential to scenario operations - invisible.

4. Distance seems to be too great for the T-50 strike mission. They approach on Afterburner all the way from where they came from and then RTB Bingo before reaching anything that could be a possible target. I suggest putting a tanker somewhere or making small adjustments in the mission editor.

5. I wouldn't change the homebase of the Su-27/30s as previously requested by other players. In reality, Hasanuddin is the homebase to the entire Indonesian Sukhoi fleet (I guess this is why you already placed them there). It's rather unlikely that they deploy detachments to airfields more south or east as these don't have the facilities to operate those aircraft. I'd say the Su's are just fine where they are. +1 tankers instead.




Maromak -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/6/2015 8:34:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Supreme 2.0

4. Distance seems to be too great for the T-50 strike mission. They approach on Afterburner all the way from where they came from and then RTB Bingo before reaching anything that could be a possible target. I suggest putting a tanker somewhere or making small adjustments in the mission editor.

5. I wouldn't change the homebase of the Su-27/30s as previously requested by other players. In reality, Hasanuddin is the homebase to the entire Indonesian Sukhoi fleet (I guess this is why you already placed them there). It's rather unlikely that they deploy detachments to airfields more south or east as these don't have the facilities to operate those aircraft. I'd say the Su's are just fine where they are. +1 tankers instead.


There is a similar 'RTB Bingo' issue in my own similar scenario with the Su-27/30 aircraft. Indonesia reportedly has at least two C-130B tankers but would they be compatible with the Su- aircraft, let alone the aircrew have enough proficiency to actually perform A2A refueling??

The issue can be solved using Lua to assign the strike aircraft to a transit mission (i.e. no afterburner) once the 'strike' has been initially triggered. Once the strike aircraft enter a predefined area closer to the RAN task group, using Lua once again, the strike aircraft could be re-assigned to a strike mission.

I haven't implemented this in my own scenario but it's on the 'to do' list for the next week or so.




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/6/2015 9:01:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Maromak

Indonesia reportedly has at least two C-130B tankers but would they be compatible with the Su- aircraft, let alone the aircrew have enough proficiency to actually perform A2A refueling??


Good point! About the compatibility, seems to be no problem.
And I think by 2019, Indonesian aircrews will be experienced enough to perform In-Air Refueling.

http://defense-studies.blogspot.de/2009/06/sukhoi-uji-coba-air-refueling.html

[image]http://tiothepolice94.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/tanker.jpg[/image]

[image]http://indomiliter.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/szcbtfa5.jpg[/image]




Maromak -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/6/2015 11:48:42 PM)

I stand corrected!

Edit: The article doesn't mention if the Su-27s are capable of A2A refueling or not. For the scenario, the article mentions the KC-130s are based at Abdurrahman Saleh air base in Malang, East Java. From memory, this airbase is already present in Command.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 3:37:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Maromak

There is a similar 'RTB Bingo' issue in my own similar scenario with the Su-27/30 aircraft. Indonesia reportedly has at least two C-130B tankers but would they be compatible with the Su- aircraft, let alone the aircrew have enough proficiency to actually perform A2A refueling??

The issue can be solved using Lua to assign the strike aircraft to a transit mission (i.e. no afterburner) once the 'strike' has been initially triggered. Once the strike aircraft enter a predefined area closer to the RAN task group, using Lua once again, the strike aircraft could be re-assigned to a strike mission.

I haven't implemented this in my own scenario but it's on the 'to do' list for the next week or so.


Damn, I didn't know you had something similar cooking.... I hope they aren't too similar. I apologize, I didn't even look for similar before I started building.




Maromak -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 4:13:47 AM)

No need for apologies. Mine was released in the first community pack as Ex Pitch Black 2017. It's good to see more scenarios set in SE Asia.




gbethel -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 4:03:25 PM)

And the F-35A's on base are not capable of operating off ship. My understanding (maybe incorrect) is that Australia is purchasing a version of the F-35B's.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 4:25:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: gbethel

And the F-35A's on base are not capable of operating off ship. My understanding (maybe incorrect) is that Australia is purchasing a version of the F-35B's.


They're on contract to buy A models... In fact, the first two Australian jets delivered to Luke AFB in Arizona in December, for initial pilot training. They're currently not buying B models, butapparently they've kicked around the idea, for operation off the Canberra class.




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 4:35:39 PM)

cf_dallas, any comments on my suggestions? Just curious what you're thinking.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 4:44:34 PM)

I like the suggestions, I'll be incorporating most of them. I've actually got a tanker track set up, I'm not sure why it's not being used. I'll check on that, and I've got a plan to make the Flankers more... useful. ;-)

I'm also planning to fold in more unpredictable/hidden Militia units, and more dynamic behavior from Militia and Indonesian units.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 5:36:47 PM)

Oh... and about the Chinooks. I didn't include them because I was adding four large fighters to the Canbera's air wing, and wanted to keep it realistic. Off the top of my head, I think I've got:
4 F35B
6 NH90
4 MH60
4 MQ8 (not currently in Australia's inventory, but seemed a reasonable addition)

Edit: and a few Tigers, I've got some of them on board too.

Do you think a couple CH47s could be added without unduly crowding flight ops?




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 6:22:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cf_dallas

Oh... and about the Chinooks. I didn't include them because I was adding four large fighters to the Canbera's air wing, and wanted to keep it realistic. Off the top of my head, I think I've got:
4 F35B
6 NH90
4 MH60
4 MQ8 (not currently in Australia's inventory, but seemed a reasonable addition)

Edit: and a few Tigers, I've got some of them on board too.

Do you think a couple CH47s could be added without unduly crowding flight ops?


I forgot taking the F-35s into account... Took the picture from the RAN website as a reference but having the additonal F-35s, MH-60Rs and UAVs in the hangar does already dramatically decrease the space for amphibious equipment.

Agreed, no Chinooks here!




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 7:07:33 PM)

If time and motivation allows, it'll also be useful to have at least some special messages (even if just one). The briefing already informed that there is some controversy in the Indonesian request for assistance and that Australian Forces should maintain a suspicious posture but having some little detail revealed about possible intentions of the Indonesian military would be very welcome.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/7/2015 10:29:39 PM)

Good call, that's definitely needed.




Maromak -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/14/2015 5:23:18 AM)

Hi and thanks again for creating this excellent scenario. I have just finished with a minor victory/848.

I think others have already mentioned most of the points I was going to make including extending the range of the patrols and the warning message/Frago once the Indonesians become hostile. If you check the Losses/Expenditures below, there are a very large number of civilian aircraft that crashed in the first few hours of the scenario, presumably due to lack of fuel as I don't think they were fired upon. Something to check.

The cloud deck at 10k ft made ground strikes more complicated which was a good addition. The QW-1 MANPADS were very difficult to detect and destroy and brought down a few of my aircraft that got too close.

Did you consider adding JORN radar coverage?

I think once the range of the Sukois and/or F-16s is extended, the player will have a lot to manage between ground strike and air defence. In the current version, the Su-27/30s didn't give me many issues as they generally RTBed before getting close to Sumba. For the majority of the scenario, I only had two F-35s dedicated to anti-air patrols.

Again, well done!

Edit: wanted to add that there appear to be a couple of TA-50 missions with triggers but no targets. Using the editor I manually launched the TA-50s but they just RTBed straight away presumably as they had no target?


SIDE: Australian Forces
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x F/A-18F Super Hornet
1x MH-60R Seahawk
1x MQ-4C Triton UAV [Global Hawk Mod]
1x MQ-8B Fire Scout UAV


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
30x 127mm/54 HE-CVT [HiFrag]
2x 25mm GAU-22/A Equalizer Burst [30 rnds]
61x 30mm Giat 30/M781 Burst [50 rnds]
17x AGM-114K Hellfire II
4x AGM-154A JSOW [145 x BLU-97/B Dual Purpose]
16x AGM-154C-1 JSOW [BROACH]
14x AGM-158A JASSM [Penetrator]
6x AGM-88E AARGM
14x AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM P3I.3
46x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
8x AIM-9X Sidewinder
2x AN/ALE-50
144x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
94x AN/SSQ-62C DICASS
98x FZ 70 70mm Rocket
12x GBU-10E/B Paveway II LGB [Mk84]
20x GBU-12B/B Paveway II LGB [Mk82]
40x GBU-12D/B Paveway II LGB [Mk82]
48x GBU-31(V)1/B JDAM [Mk84]
48x GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]
24x GBU-54(V)1/B LJDAM [Mk82]
19x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
21x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
1x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
3x Mk48 Mod 7 ADCAP CBASS
4x MU-90 Impact
9x RIM-162B ESSM
32x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6MR Blk I
1x UGM-84D Harpoon IC



SIDE: Civilians
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x Airbus A.310-200
1x Airbus A.310-300
1x Airbus A.319-100
3x Airbus A.320-200
1x Airbus A.321-200
2x Airbus A.330-200
1x Airbus A.340-500
1x ATR-72-500
2x Avro RJ70 [Mod BAe 146-100]
2x Biologic Tuna Fishes
1x Biologic Whale
2x Boeing 737-300
2x Boeing 737-700ER
1x Boeing 747-400
2x Boeing 757-200
1x Boeing 767-300
5x Boeing 767-400ER
1x Building (Small)
3x Civilian Dhow [15m]
1x Civilian Dhow [22m]
1x Commercial Ferry [1,900t DWT]
3x Commercial Fishing Boat [23m]
2x Dash 8-200
9x Vehicle (Car x 1)
4x Vehicle (Truck, Gaz Tigr)
3x Vehicle (Truck, HMMWV)
3x Vehicle (Truck, Unarmed)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Aussie Bases
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: Indonesian Forces
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x 357 Bung Tomo [Nakhoda Ragam, F2000]
2x 371 Kapitan Patimura [Pr.1331 Parchim]
1x 401 Cakra [Type 209-1300]
4x 641 Clurit [KCR-40]
3x Boeing 737-200A Surveiller SLAMMR
4x CN-235-110
1x F-16A Falcon
2x F-16B Falcon
3x Radar (Generic 2D Air Search Radar [Long-Range])
4x Radar (Generic Air Traffic Control)
4x SA.565MA Panther
2x Su-27SKM Flanker B
6x Su-30MK2 Flanker G
6x TA-50 Golden Eagle
1x Z-9EC Dauphin 2


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
37x AA-12 Adder A [R-77, RVV-AE]
1x AK-630 30mm/65 Gatling Burst [400 rnds]
4x AK-725 57mm/80 Twin HE Burst [6 rnds]
8x C-705
59x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
1x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
4x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
2x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
3x Mistral 2
4x PK-16 Flare [TST-60U]
6x Sea Wolf VLS Blk 1
2x SET-40U [MGT-1, NATO SET-40-62]
2x SS-N-26 Sapless [P-800 Onyx]
2x Super Barricade Flare



SIDE: Militia
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
24x 122mm/38 Type 86 Towed Howitzer
12x 25mm Type 87
12x 35mm/90 Twin Type 90 [China Type 902 FC]
92x 7.62mm MG
15x 81mm Mortar
12x C-802 Triple
12x Civilian RHIB [11m, Armed]
2x Commercial Fishing Boat [23m]
12x HJ-8E
8x HQ-16A TELAR
18x QW-1 Vanguard MANPADS
12x RM-70 MLRS
4x Vehicle (China Type 352 Square Tie)
6x Vehicle (China Type 902)
2x Vehicle (HQ-16A FCR)
8x Vehicle (Truck, Armed Technical)
4x YJ-62 Triple


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
147x 12.7mm/50 MG Burst [10 rnds]
16x 25mm Type 87 Burst [20 rnds]
7x 35mm/90 Twin Type-90 Burst [20 rnds, China Type 902 FC]
952x 7.62mm MG Burst [20 rnds]
2400x 81mm HE Mortar
8x HQ-16A
29x QW-1 Vanguard



SIDE: Other Allies
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
38x AN/SSQ-53D DIFAR
82x SSQ-926 ALFEA







cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/15/2015 12:09:18 AM)

Ok, something squirrelly with the airlines, the 747 has enough fuel to get between any two airports in the scenario without trouble. I'll definitely check that.

I've got some pretty big changes in an update, ready to go. Falcon, and TA50 improvements, more interesting militia behavior, and yes, frag-o's. The last was a huge, glaring omission. And yes, the Flankers. First of all, I turned refueling on, d'oh. Second, I hopefully made then much more of a factor.




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (1/30/2015 2:54:56 AM)

Just so my legions of fans don't think I've forgotten (ok.... five of you). I'm playtesting Release 2 right now.... I added or changed a ton of events, I want to make sure they're working. It's a slow process on a 2.5 ghz pc, with 2 gb ram and native video. :-)




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (2/12/2015 5:33:02 PM)

Ok, finished a run through last night, finally. All the new events and so on work as designed, which is good. I've got a list of a couple dozen minor tweaks to get ready for release.

Question for the folks that played this before: what are your thoughts on having an SF squad or two on the island? It should certainly ease the complexity of finding/targeting Militia units... but would that make it too easy?




Vici Supreme -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (2/13/2015 6:02:08 PM)

I think that's up to you, what you want your scenario to be.
- Having Special Forces going in first is the more realistic way in my opinion.
- Doing it without such assets might be a more beneficial way for the overall scenario challenge.

A good compromise would be to give the player the ability to deploy SF if he wishes to by sending a NH90 or C-130 into an area connected to a spawn-event. Just an idea!

Supreme




cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (2/18/2015 3:56:45 AM)

OK, finally an updated version, uploaded in the first post of this thread.

Change Log (well, at least partial... I think I lost a couple pages of notes):
- Upgraded Indonesian Su-30s to allow more interesting loadouts (if Indonesia were getting into a fight with someone I don't think this is too much of a stretch; I used Malaysian version as stand-in)
- Improved Indonesian tanker situation
- Redeployed many TA-50s
- Added targets to all Indonesian strike missions
- Gave the Indonesian 'phibs a reason for being in the scenario
- Moved a lot of the militia units off-island, and added a few, activated via teleport events, to simulate units coming out of hiding
- Added a few more fleet broadcasts and more ongoing intel during the scenario
- Moved some RAN units to make the game flow better (at least, in my play-through)
- Added two ASAS patrols on Sumba; relocated one of the SSKs to be consistent with having just dropped them on the island. (ASAS units simulated using USN SEALS)
- Added variable weather

Let me know what you think! I think it's going to be tougher, but a lot more realistic and hopefully immersive. I enjoyed playing it through, even on my insanely slow computer.

Two other notes:
- Maromak, you posted that all the airliners died when you played it the first time... I couldn't reproduce that.
- You also mentioned JORN... I didn't include that here, but I'm interested. I'll have to do a little playing with it to see how it impacts the scenario. There will be another upgrade coming when 1.07 releases, to take advantage of the improved strike logic. I'll take a look at JORN at that time.





AlexGGGG -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (2/20/2015 9:09:06 PM)

Before any shots were fired, I got score -30 because of BAe 146s probably running out of fuel.

SIDE: Civilians
===========================================================
LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x Avro RJ70 [Mod BAe 146-100]


--- Err, make it -60 by 2days to go, with a loss of

2x Avro RJ70 [Mod BAe 146-100]
2x Dash 8-200





cf_dallas -> RE: Operation Balpara 2019 (2/21/2015 12:04:56 AM)

Well damn..... were any weapons expended, by anyone? Anyone want to help with troubleshooting????
- I ran the scenario with only the civilian side, no airliners down
- I ran it with only civilians, Indonesians and militia, no airliners down
- I ran it with all sides, through the entire scenario... no freakin airliners down.

I'm at a loss. When Maromak said he saw that on the previous version, I looked for it, couldn't make it happen.




Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.625