njp72 -> RE: Empire strikes back- NJP vs Wargmr (no wargmr) (7/11/2016 11:20:56 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrKane quote:
ORIGINAL: obvert quote:
ORIGINAL: MrKane quote:
ORIGINAL: obvert quote:
ORIGINAL: njp72 quote:
ORIGINAL: Lowpe I double checked Mr. Kane GreyJoy and he was field the Ki94 and Shinden in mid Dec 44 or even earlier. I think he had 90 of the Ki94 flying at end game. There is a morale impact I noticed of the advanced frames coming early, and their presence so early did demoralize GreyJoy and played a role in him deciding to surrender. So, there is that. I wonder what would have been the impact on Japan in your game had the Allies pursued a methodical industrial aerial attack. Even a night bombing campaign with 4E...how much would that have hindered his ground advance? If Japan is left industrially intact then they can be ferocious end game opponents. Agree, the Allies need to focus on cutting off the oil/fuel for Japan and start attacking industry. As you have succinctly put, an industrially intact Japan will fight you hard right into 45 despite the inferiority of their weapon systems. In my late game Jocke systematically dismantled the Japanese industry starting in the DEI in mid-44, moving through China and up to the Home Islands. He also made sure to cut off fuel as soon as possible, which was around the turn of 45. He also did target individual aircraft factories, taking out many of the more important or late fighters, including the Ki-83 and J7W. In spite of not being happy with his B-29 losses throughout, he accomplished the goal very effectively. Previous to that game so many players told me to stockpile HI, but no one mentioned supply. Although I did last until July 45 at that point I was able to only barely set CAP and fly occasional strikes as even on Honshu many bases were low on supply. I would say supply is paramount to functioning late, as well as keeping oil/fuel flowing as long as possible, but certain fighters can make a huge difference. The Ki-84r is huge, and we know that, because you can make numbers and it can work both offensively and defensively into mid-45. No one is talking about the Ki-84b here, which I'm curious to try this game. Defensively some players like Pax swear by it. No one has mentioned the N1K5 either. I didn't use it before, but it should be very good defensively. The Ki-83 allows Japan to have long range offensive capability well into 45. It's incredibly effective, and can stand up to most Allied fighters 1:1. getting a 1:1 result rather than 1:3 is huge as it preserves pilots, kills opposing pilots, and makes for slowed pace if a few sweeps don't clear the path for bombers. The NF are also crucial as I found out. This game I plan to use several I didn't before, including the Nick Id and the Randy Ic. Here though is where numbers really count. Usually I am not using Ki-84b simple because I can have Ki-83 around same time, additionally Ki-84b is low-medium altitude fighter, this is not enough from my point of view to be good very late war fighter. Ki-100 can do fine as defensive fighter and it is easy to maintain due to nice SR:1. Ki-83 is great plane to organize LRCAP traps far behind front lines, either;) The best IJA fighter in game in my opinion. Well N1K5 looks great too, however I do not see reason to R&D it. N1K2 can do job fine until end and SR:2 is very nice to have in late time war. Ki-84r and Ki-83 are enough for offensive purpose in my opinion. By limit yourself to produce only a few airframes you can save a lot of supplies too. I have very nice experience with Ki-44c either, even in late '44 or early '45. How do you all use the Ki-44 IIc? I found it dropped off to being almost useless, similar to an Oscar but without the range, by mid-late-44. The Ki-100 in my game is still only 360mph, or 367mph for the final version. without Symon's air fixes it's decent, but not great at that speed. Sweeps take out a lot once P-47N and P-51D and late Spits get involved. It did well against the USN and Marines though. The N1K1 is better in my experience to the N1K2 simply because of the extra bit of accurate firepower, but I also build for the service 2, and I try to keep some N1K1 around. Also it has a higher max altitude which gives it a big advantage. The N1K5 seems on paper to be a faster, more powerful version all around, but unfortunately doesn't have the high max altitude. Those two 12.7mm MG with 50 accuracy have to help a lot though. Well, my game with GJ was without Symon's air fixes except 2 months in mid '44. So all I am saying it is about my experience with stock airframes. However I did not meet P-51D or P-47N in air yet, GJ surrendered game before end of January 1945 ;(. What I know, base on reading your ARR I am using little different air doctrine. Sorry njp72, it seems I am using a lot of yours space here. So I will stop here ;) Not at all Mr Kane, you are welcome anytime here. Please feel free to continue to add to this conversation which I am finding very valuable.[:)]
|
|
|
|