RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

Kofiman -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 9:01:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clicked on the b*****y AXIS thread again....[8|]

Didn't read anything.



Why not bookmark the two relevant threads so you don't have to enter them from the forum?



Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 4:36:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kofiman


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clicked on the b*****y AXIS thread again....[8|]

Didn't read anything.



Why not bookmark the two relevant threads so you don't have to enter them from the forum?

Thank you for your suggestion. [:)]



Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 4:49:39 PM)

May/Jun '40
Impulse #9 (Allied)

No strategic bombing. No ground strikes.

The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics rail move the 3rd Rifle division from Cernauti to Leningrad. General Archibald Percival Wavell, 1st Earl Wavell, transfers his command from Algeria to southern Spain.

CW move one corps from Tangier to Gibraltar, a garrison from Bayonne into Spain, and Gort moves from Santander to Bilbao. The Nationalists makes minor adjustments of their defensive lines in China.

Now over to The Honourable Warspite for an update on the latest Soviet moves.



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 7:30:55 PM)

May/Jun 1940
Impulse: 9

Little to report from China and environs.

The Soviets send their AT divisions on manoeuvres in Bessarabia and that is about it.

No re-bases or air reorganisations.

I've ordered the automated die rolls for the end of turn phase but nothing is happening. Anyone got any e-mails?



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 7:48:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kofiman


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clicked on the b*****y AXIS thread again....[8|]

Didn't read anything.



Why not bookmark the two relevant threads so you don't have to enter them from the forum?
warspite1

I have no idea what that means [;)]



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 7:50:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

May/Jun 1940
Impulse: 9

Little to report from China and environs.

The Soviets send their AT divisions on manoeuvres in Bessarabia and that is about it.

No re-bases or air reorganisations.

I've ordered the automated die rolls for the end of turn phase but nothing is happening. Anyone got any e-mails?
warspite1

Right I am going to try a TEST. This is not the roll (as there may be another roll out in the ether!).



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:03:35 PM)

Right, the test came through - marked TESTTESTTEST (and damn it was a 1) - so maybe I pressed something by mistake the first time.

Right for the avoidance of doubt I am going to send through the actual throw now - it will be marked End of Turn (Actual). If the original throw does turn up (it will be marked simply End of Turn) then this can be ignored.



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:11:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Right, the test came through - marked TESTTESTTEST (and damn it was a 1) - so maybe I pressed something by mistake the first time.

Right for the avoidance of doubt I am going to send through the actual throw now - it will be marked End of Turn (Actual). If the original throw does turn up (it will be marked simply End of Turn) then this can be ignored.
warspite1

Oh FFS. The original has now come through and before I sent End of Turn (actual). I therefore think in fairness this should stand as the actual throw. Even though its a 6 [:@][:D]





AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:12:34 PM)

TESSTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTESTTEST.............TEST - 1 received loud and clear.

End of Turn - 6 received loud and clear.

End of Turn (Actual) - Not received. We'll take the 6 [;)]



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:19:04 PM)

Okay the e-mail with the file should be in the ether..... or somewhere [8|]



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:22:12 PM)

I also received 6 and test, no other rolls.

And I received save file also.



AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:23:25 PM)

Game save file received also.



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:30:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

I also received 6 and test, no other rolls.

And I received save file also.
warspite1

Yes, the third roll (actual) was not sent because the first e-mail eventually came in - although it took longer than the second (TESTTESTTEST). Therefore the 6 stands and the turn continues [:@]

Clear?

[:)]



AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/14/2016 8:39:10 PM)


[/quote]warspite1


Clear?

[:)]

[/quote]

Clear

[image]local://upfiles/47730/116C1182B4EF4ED498A6DD85DF7A1B08.jpg[/image]



scout1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 12:12:50 AM)

Have this game, but dropped it from the hard drive some time ago due to
a) issue with the code/game
b) I really didn't understand it was basically a head to head or solitare game ....

Just how does a pbem approach work with this ?



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 6:17:18 AM)

Hi scout1,

Game is working quite well now, that is my opinion.

This game is a multi player game, you can play it alone, but it is quite hard to surprise yourself [;)]

Pbem works well. You can ask responses using email, skype or AAR like we do. 4 player game pbem is slower than two player game. 2 player pbem with AAR is quite fast, but not as fast as using skype (never tried myself).





warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 6:23:14 PM)

Hi Gents

Just wondering if there is any plan for action tonight/tomorrow?

Thanks



scout1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 6:37:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Hi scout1,

Game is working quite well now, that is my opinion.

This game is a multi player game, you can play it alone, but it is quite hard to surprise yourself [;)]

Pbem works well. You can ask responses using email, skype or AAR like we do. 4 player game pbem is slower than two player game. 2 player pbem with AAR is quite fast, but not as fast as using skype (never tried myself).





So are you trading game files via email ?
I did try solitaire some time ago and only then realized how highly interactive the turn was for "both" players.

Is there a description / discussion on the forum as to the method for pbem ? Is a little confusing as to how this is actually done .....
Any insight would be appreciated .......



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 6:49:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: scout1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Hi scout1,

Game is working quite well now, that is my opinion.

This game is a multi player game, you can play it alone, but it is quite hard to surprise yourself [;)]

Pbem works well. You can ask responses using email, skype or AAR like we do. 4 player game pbem is slower than two player game. 2 player pbem with AAR is quite fast, but not as fast as using skype (never tried myself).





So are you trading game files via email ?
I did try solitaire some time ago and only then realized how highly interactive the turn was for "both" players.

Is there a description / discussion on the forum as to the method for pbem ? Is a little confusing as to how this is actually done .....
Any insight would be appreciated .......

warspite1

Hi scout1

So what are you after in particular?

If you look at this AAR for example you can see how we interact on decisions. As said before there is no Skype here - communication is all done here (or the Axis / Allied threads).

Yes the saved game is sent to each other via e-mail at the end of, or during, the turn as appropriate. One side will generally do the end of turn go - with the other side providing details for return to base, production, reinforcement etc.

If there is anything more specific you need please ask.



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 6:54:10 PM)

I will start playing tonight about in 1,5 hours.



brian brian -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:42:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

I will start playing tonight about in 1,5 hours.


Cookie Monster need Cookie! Faster Cookie!

Have never seen Franco set up shop on The Rock before. Mmmmm, irony Cookie taste delicious.



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:46:25 PM)

M/J 40 Axis 10

No DoW

Germany and Italy combined, Japan land.

Germany sends Bf109 to Bay of Biscay box 1 and TRS + AMPH to Baltic Sea box 3 loaded with MIL and GAR.

Italian fleet leaves La Spezia and enters to West Med. Allies feel like intercepting?

[image]local://upfiles/39586/844437085B1747D6AC81A31E79518900.jpg[/image]



Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:51:07 PM)

quote:

Allies feel like intercepting?

No, thank you.



warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:51:55 PM)

Axis Gents

I recall there was an issue with the peacekeepers rule. I think it was that if the peacekeepers were stacked alone then they could not be attacked. I don't know if that bug is still in force but if so presumably we can agree that any landing of peacekeepers must ensure that they are stacked with the 'home' unit?



Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:52:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

I will start playing tonight about in 1,5 hours.


Cookie Monster need Cookie! Faster Cookie!

Have never seen Franco set up shop on The Rock before. Mmmmm, irony Cookie taste delicious.

[:D]



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:55:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Axis Gents

I recall there was an issue with the peacekeepers rule. I think it was that if the peacekeepers were stacked alone then they could not be attacked. I don't know if that bug is still in force but if so presumably we can agree that any landing of peacekeepers must ensure that they are stacked with the 'home' unit?


What are you talking about? Is there a war where Axis should send peacekeepers? If there is, we are ready to defend all free and neutral nations!

And we will land units with "home" units or places you can't attack right away [8D]



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 8:59:03 PM)

Allies must be surprised when Italian fleet stops to West Med box 2 and loads INF div from Spain.

Axis initiates combat in both possible sea areas.



[image]local://upfiles/39586/E2D06DC9BAC74531B5DE85AC4B4ABF63.jpg[/image]



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 9:01:13 PM)

No additional air for Axis. Allies can send Hurricane to box 1, how about?



Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 9:07:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Allies can send Hurricane to box 1, how about?

Sounds like a plan.



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (7/16/2016 9:08:18 PM)

CW sends Hurricane. And I was talking about West Med, forgot to mention that [:(]



Page: <<   < prev  43 44 [45] 46 47   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.953125