RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report

Message

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 5:43:07 AM)
Assumed 1-6 CA was supposed to be 6-6 CA, but in the end did not matter, since the Axis aborted the FR CA. Only 1 CA and 1 CP left in the sea area. [image]local://upfiles/47448/B6319693C2B04D10AC1E94A5D04D22F1.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 5:52:04 AM)
Round 3, both found. Axis search was a 2, allies search was a 1. I spend your two surprise points increasing the AA to lowest of 6. You rolled well with the lowest being a 3. The one AS had no impact on one ship. Onto round 4. [image]local://upfiles/47448/D724405B4C864594B165E205EF8C5BE3.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 5:54:43 AM)
Round 4 allies find on a 2 versus axis 10. I avoided combat for you, nothing else makes sense to me. [image]local://upfiles/47448/EE5BD625917D4FA594DF1D9CA864E7EC.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 5:58:40 AM)
I aborted the Erbus to Malta, the other two CW CA to Gibraltar, and the FR CA to Casablanca.

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:02:54 AM)
On 6 and 7's there was no contact in the North Sea. [image]local://upfiles/47448/334A39467A8A4CCF9106EC12F582EFF1.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:13:15 AM)
I went all out on the ground strikes on Paris resulted in all three being disorganized. [image]local://upfiles/47448/36E7107BCA0748C29DBAC8A53C8A627F.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:47:48 AM)
Well, I cannot catch a break on the Eurpean front. Paris stands, who do you wish to lose. If I don't attack at +16 or better, I can't get it done. I expended everything to get it done now and failed. I swear that in this game rolls of 5 or worse are more likely than 11 or better. All of '41 is likely lost. I will not be able to get troops into position in any direction. [image]local://upfiles/47448/F0F68788FCBB476FAEB6743318B342C3.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:49:12 AM)
Oh, also, I lose the engineer again. I can only get one attack with him before I have to rebuild him. I am frustrated!!! time to sleep on this.

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 11:13:43 AM)
I'll take the French HQ (Billotte) as my loss.

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 4:22:26 PM)
Europe situation. It has just taken too long for the axis and it is still not done. I would have probably done better to just wait it out for the weather to clear. Impatience in my key fault in this game. [image]local://upfiles/47448/E82D5206940543F8B467F41CFE6CF68A.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 4:23:35 PM)
China. Note, the whole force around Chungking (only partially shown) is out of supply due to the weather. [image]local://upfiles/47448/5D07271496024044A476F3A8D35CC214.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:14:58 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. Actions. [image]local://upfiles/31901/D8A6C82B8679454EBB130B2773B308F4.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:29:02 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. RN x 2 and FRA x 1 Naval Moves. The RN moves 1 BB, 3 CAs, 2 CPs and the French 1 CA to the 0-box of the Western Med. The RN also moves 2 loaded TRS supported by the Ark Royal, 2 BBs and 2 CAs to the 2-box of Cape St. Vincent. [image]local://upfiles/31901/E0C73DEC02DB4DE19E75BEA5CD1D5617.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:31:23 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. Cape St. Vincent, Western Med. The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent and the Western Med. We'll get back to whether and how the axis wish to proceed in these two areas after the allies try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea. [image]local://upfiles/31901/238E1A67D8BB4C628DE44C25EBFD648A.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:39:56 PM)
quote: The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent and the Western Med. We'll get back to whether and how the axis wish to proceed in these two areas after the allies try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea. Will anything other than the Blenheim be able to react to the W. Med?

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:43:45 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. North Sea. RN, Attempt to Initiate Combat. Here's the current situation in the North Sea. During their Naval Air Phase the CW flew their Whitley and Harrow bomber units supported by their Mk. IF fighter unit into the 3-box of the North Sea. During the try to initiate a naval combat the RAF added a Hurricane fighter unit to the 0-box. The Luftwaffe can add any of their three fighter units shown below. Which units, if any, would you like to add and in which sea box would you like to add them? Also, in order to get a jump on the other two sea areas would you like to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both of the Western Med and Cape St. Vincent? And, if so, which units would you like to use for the attempt? [image]local://upfiles/31901/E73E7CC37EB047D7BF068ECBD75F97B2.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 6:44:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ashkpa quote: The RN declines the opportunity to try to initiate naval combat in Cape St. Vincent and the Western Med. We'll get back to whether and how the axis wish to proceed in these two areas after the allies try to initiate a naval combat in the North Sea. Will anything other than the Blenheim be able to react to the W. Med? No, only the Blenheim.

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:07:34 PM)
quote: Which units, if any, would you like to add and in which sea box would you like to add them? Also, in order to get a jump on the other two sea areas would you like to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both of the Western Med and Cape St. Vincent? And, if so, which units would you like to use for the attempt? Nobody is added to the N. Sea. I will initiate in the W. Med with the BF110e. I will skip the CSV zone.

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:22:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ashkpa quote: Which units, if any, would you like to add and in which sea box would you like to add them? Also, in order to get a jump on the other two sea areas would you like to try to initiate a naval combat in either or both of the Western Med and Cape St. Vincent? And, if so, which units would you like to use for the attempt? Nobody is added to the N. Sea. I will initiate in the W. Med with the BF110e. I will skip the CSV zone. North Sea Search Rolls: Allies 5, Axis 6. No contact, no combat. Western Med Search Rolls: Axis 10, Allies 2. The allies (RN) use their surprise points to avoid combat. [image]local://upfiles/31901/BA9B9EF5DD004145B970A4BA4715A7C3.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:47:46 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. China. Post movement, no air or land combat. [image]local://upfiles/31901/0587DE2F6A424846B969A5FC1C3E236D.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:48:23 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. East Africa. Post movement, no air or land combat. [image]local://upfiles/31901/E57B3E3B32C04FDFB7BE048358E23D24.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:48:55 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. North Africa (East). Post movement, no air or land combat. [image]local://upfiles/31901/4F803F38FF2449C7AEF1510EE12DE648.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:49:38 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. Gibraltar. West Med. North Africa (West). Post movement, no air or land combat. [image]local://upfiles/31901/389028707F3141D98B2D35156921C29D.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:50:18 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. France. Post movement, no air or land combat. [image]local://upfiles/31901/2DE3840E15014D92BF205BD12A2F20F9.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:51:03 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Allied #7. End of Turn Check. This turn continues. [image]local://upfiles/31901/B2D374C93CB64846B26692ED56B318E9.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 7:51:34 PM)
Sep-Oct 1940. Axis #9. Weather. [:(] [image]local://upfiles/31901/AC9F3EC35E3F4534ACB947BB3F71A354.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 10:08:17 PM)
SO40 i9 Axis GS Forgot to image the Chinese ground strikes on Chungking. Two plans and an ART all missed. Strike on Antwerp shown below. [image]local://upfiles/47448/AD503F6401A0479E8381E62AA018B35F.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 10:47:59 PM)
Three attacks at Nantes, Chungking and Antwerp. You have support options at Antwerp. first is shore bombardment and then air support (I do have a fighter in range). I don't think there is any support available for the other two attacks. [image]local://upfiles/47448/478D89E0398C4713AD015FED3692A4AE.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 10:57:05 PM)
Antwerp defense - no defensive air support. Defensive shore bombardment - apply the max that can be applied. By the way, I had forgotten that we were playing with defensive shore bombardment. [X(]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/21/2016 11:02:26 PM)
quote: By the way, I had forgotten that we were playing with defensive shore bombardment. I had not, it influenced a number of earlier decisions around Antwerp and other coastal towns.

Page: << < prev 23 24 [25] 26 27 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.09375