RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

cfinch -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/1/2016 3:22:16 PM)

fwiw - i thought only bad roll was DX (or AX) in which case you just let other player choose effectively 'fixing' the roll.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/1/2016 4:16:14 PM)

Japanese are doing several ground strikes. The Chinese fighter can fly over it's own hex, assuming it did not fly CAP (email question - assumption being no, if it did, then myhttp://www.matrixgames.com/forums/post.asp?do=reply&messageID=4109144&toStyle=tm# ground strike flights may change). Do you want it to fly defending Chiang?

[image]local://upfiles/47448/433EFAF19F2B42DE9DF1003F70A50BFA.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/1/2016 5:46:34 PM)

Yes to Chinese fighter flying to defend Chaing against Ground Strikes. Rebase Chinese fighter in hex, China[87, 136].

Also, the Poles choose assault on all land combats this impulse. Any results calling for less losses than units attacked chose the least important ones first to destroy.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 2:25:37 PM)

Getting a bit done before my guest awake this morning.

Chinese AA combat.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/9A75254A8A8B4B3FAEA887A6545F14BF.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 2:30:26 PM)

Lodz Ground Strike

[image]local://upfiles/47448/11D4FA1EACE342749E946A16AD12F60D.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 2:30:57 PM)

Warsaw Ground Strike

[image]local://upfiles/47448/9E18B6BA6F4A422EBB6A468695730081.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 2:31:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Getting a bit done before my guest awake this morning.
Looks like no rebasing necessary for the Chinese fighter. [:(]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 2:49:29 PM)

Where would you like surviving Polish naval units to flee?



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 2:57:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Where would you like surviving Polish naval units to flee?

Scapa flow.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 3:31:16 PM)

Polish CA escapes to Scapa Flow, however the convoy was sunk on way out of port.
German Attack on Krakow was a full success. And is to be followed up by two other attacks.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/A800B711E95B4D1FAAC516EE932C3442.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 3:34:26 PM)

Poznan is another success.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/11310BFDCA314EC18EADAA68EF46F93F.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 3:37:44 PM)

And the hat trick was completed north of Warsaw.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/4D909841182F431B948D036F23DE0E33.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 3:46:42 PM)

Below is not an issue at the moment. Is their an explanation on why the reorg cost for the Harbin Terr is 4? Japanese took a combined, so I was expecting to see it cost 2.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/07AB9C75C4D2452A8B36378ECA829C43.jpg[/image]



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 4:12:27 PM)

Did you choose land action, combined or naval?



Courtenay -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 5:51:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Below is not an issue at the moment. Is their an explanation on why the reorg cost for the Harbin Terr is 4? Japanese took a combined, so I was expecting to see it cost 2.



The Harbin TERR is not a Japanese unit, it is a Manchurian unit. For a Japanese HQ to reorganize it costs double. As the Japanese took a combined, this is doubled a second time to four.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 9:28:19 PM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2.

France & CW take navals. China takes a land. USSR & USA take combines.

The CW decides to use 2 of their 3 air missions for (surprise) port strikes. The first one is against Keil.

Keil (surprise) Port Strike.

I made the "minor" decision for you NOT to commit your subs at Keil. I hope this is ok and I hope we can make minor decisions such as these for the non-phasing player in order to speed up play.

Back to the Kiel port strike. The RAF bombers got through and did surprise the KM. However, their bombs were much less effective than I had hoped.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/81D8657BF1A94B7FB21256C659ED9BED.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 9:30:37 PM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Rostock (surprise) Port Strike.

Again, RAF bombers get through and surprise the KM at Rostock. And again, the bombers are less effective than hoped.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/58FC90ED9F964521BBBA118F98DDD4C5.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/2/2016 10:53:59 PM)

QUESTION: Does the Luftwaffe wish to intercept the Polish bomber flying a ground strike mission on the units in Krawkow, Poland? The Polish fighter is flying escort.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/A71F2771F39947CE8F57328839921FF7.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 1:17:21 AM)

Fine with the minor decisions (or really obvious). Yes intercept the Polish bomber.

I'm ok with 2.2.5 I really don't expect the loss issues with invasions or paradrops to raise it's head early in this game.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 1:32:41 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Polish Ground Strike.

I'm sorry, but a great result for the Poles.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/94677A77B4A64645BDF12CDDDF0F8EA1.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 1:34:10 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. French Ground Strike.

Sorry again, a great result for the French.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7E520EE6D4234399AA27BB24FEB030B9.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 1:35:10 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. French Ground Strike #2.

The allied ground strikes were embarrassingly effective.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/DDAF4ABC6DB84D0F99598734CB5F4731.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 1:36:34 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Baltic. French Subs.

I doubt this makes up for the allies good luck with the ground strikes, but French subs were embarrassingly ineffective in the Baltic.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/5A16C991670D4C9B9DDC5F1BE4A79A74.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 2:25:11 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. ChiComm. China Sea.

Why is there a Japanese invasion force in the China Sea? The Philippines? Given that Japan can't DOW the Soviet Union for a year what else is there for the Japanese to invade? Unless Pat is just transporting these units to reinforce the Japanese in China.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/B421C3E2DCB6417D82AAF9D452338579.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 2:35:30 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Nationalist Chinese.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/0E6AC3DC8CD541C8AB04798CC94DF1E4.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 2:36:36 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. Poland. USSR.

The Soviets claim both Eastern Poland and the Baltic States. This actions empties the USA Germany/Italy entry pool. That is, two chits were pulled, one for each claim.

By the way, the Polish fighter flew into Eastern Poland and was interned (I hope) when the Soviets claimed Eastern Poland. The Polish bomber didn't have the legs to make it into Eastern Poland. I put in place that I hope inconveniences the Germans if they wish to overrun him. I pretty sure he would be a dead man if he went back to Warsaw. But, maybe this was a boneheaded rebasing decision on my part?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/511BD359957740B89CCD9746AED9113A.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 2:37:13 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. France. CW.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/58C1D8DC531547C1AA7267FE865CCDA6.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/3/2016 2:37:45 AM)

Turn 1. Sep/Oct 1939. Allied #2. USA HQ Reorg.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/8E66F245BFA34676BBF0D398BEBC3FC4.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/7/2016 1:13:07 AM)

ND39 - Impulse 3 - Axis
Storms of the century approach and cover Europe and the globe. This puts a stop to many potential actions, but the push in Poland will continue.



[image]local://upfiles/47448/CF21C3D9D8114E6DB5837CE6EFEDE5B5.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/7/2016 1:18:07 AM)

Here are the results of two attacks in Poland. Rousing successes, though the luck was not great it was good enough.

Pat

[image]local://upfiles/47448/3AFA11FAC12A437781EC7B148176ED19.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.202637