RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/28/2017 7:35:49 PM)

Both Red fighters intercept.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/29/2017 12:42:21 AM)

Ground results. Air-Air cleared the Tank Buster and shot down the RU fighter (pilot survived).
Art missed both of its targets and the Tank Buster hit both of its targets.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/326FA6ED86C44504BD746FFA446B9402.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/29/2017 4:47:17 AM)

There were no axis land attacks. A rare occurrence in a clear MJ impulse.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/30/2017 11:52:32 PM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Actions.

Note that the USA played an o-chit and reorganized all their HQ units.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/F056585F62934F8B88794E6E6DB649F5.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 12:10:27 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. USN, Pacific. Contested Sea Areas (The Solomons, Central Pacific, The Marianas). No Combat.

The USA added no additional units to these sea areas and will not attempt to initiate combat.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/6CB09C44DA2C4F2AA3EB35F7E2BB694C.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 12:15:53 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. USN & RN. The Atlantic. Contested Sea Areas (Cape St. Vincent & Faeroes Gap). No Combat.

The USN and RN added no additional units to these sea areas and will not attempt to initiate combat.

This leaves two sea areas in which the USN will attempt to initiate naval combat. One in the Pacific (Bismarck Sea) and one in the Atlantic (Bay of Biscay).


[image]local://upfiles/31901/BDEEAD707CB24A52A83E8A55BAA600B7.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 12:27:47 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Attempted Naval Combat. Bay of Biscay.

The USN is attempting to initiate a naval combat in the Bay of Biscay. The allies will react out one fighter to the 2-box.

Do the axis wish to react out any additional air units?

Instructions for the battle?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/F4FB2C0F96EA4CE9A0725B7F7C665228.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 12:34:37 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Attempted Naval Combat. Bismarck Sea.

The allies choose not to react out any additional air units. The Japanese have no in position that can. So, search proceeds with the allies missing badly (10) and the Japanese finding.

Instructions?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/EAD822A537E8436ABDCD65D03C2BCC33.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 2:24:20 AM)

quote:

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Attempted Naval Combat. Bay of Biscay.

The USN is attempting to initiate a naval combat in the Bay of Biscay. The allies will react out one fighter to the 2-box.

Do the axis wish to react out any additional air units?

Instructions for the battle?
I will not react any units out. I will avoid if possible.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 2:39:56 AM)

quote:

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Attempted Naval Combat. Bismarck Sea.

The allies choose not to react out any additional air units. The Japanese have no in position that can. So, search proceeds with the allies missing badly (10) and the Japanese finding.

Instructions?
The JP aircraft spot multiple ships, but decide to concentrate on the CVs (engage 3-box only). If I will spend up to 8 SP to alter the air-air combat in the following order +1 for me, -1 to you, another +1 for me, and last another -2 for you. I believe I have 8 SP, but not quite sure.

Make put the Seiku in front for the bombers. If I lose (abort or shot down) both fighters and you have both fighters or my lead bomber is not the Seiku, then the bombers abort.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 2:43:49 PM)

Turn 23. Allied #4. USN. Bismarck Sea. Naval Battle. Round 1.

It's a disaster for the USN ... the second one this turn. With nothing really left to lose the USN and RN forces stay.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/2751A4A2FB5041CC8A0F582686726D01.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (10/31/2017 2:52:58 PM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 2. Searches.

Round 2 searches in the Bismarck Sea also go the Japanese way.

Instructions?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7FF85B834D504E2E8D243D3DBC87C27F.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/1/2017 3:43:40 AM)

quote:

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 2. Searches.

Round 2 searches in the Bismarck Sea also go the Japanese way.

Instructions?
Debated avoiding, but in the end the transport is too tempting.
Engage the 1-box only. Use 2 SP to reduce AA to ne.
Use remaining SP to increase damage and target the transport.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/2/2017 2:51:43 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 2.

Brutal for the USN, but could have been a lot worse. The USN TRS and BB both survived their damage rolls.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/DD138F2090B94ACD8A4C072F2800DF81.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/2/2017 2:54:22 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. Bismarck Sea. Round 3.

The USN stays for another potential round; however, both search rolls fail (allies 9, axis 8).



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/2/2017 3:00:57 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. IJN Intercept Attempt. The Solomons.

An IJN sub unit attempts, but fails, to intercept the unescorted Yorktown on it's way back to Pearl Harbor.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/DB7CB8DBC4FA496F8DFB62AB2D5639CC.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/2/2017 3:04:50 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USN/RN. Attempted Naval Combat. Bay of Biscay.

Search rolls, allies 8, axis 5. Neither side finds.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/96048198D2654EDDBA93326435B76229.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/3/2017 2:51:33 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USMC. Amphibious Invasion of Eniwetok.

Folks this is the USMC 1st marine division! The same division that was featured in the HBO mini-series, "The Pacific".

[image]local://upfiles/31901/09DBC32A049B4C9F9B3E15828043D3E1.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/3/2017 2:52:11 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USSR. Main Front.

Not good.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/39CC75AAE9AB43A0B226EE42CC81AE34.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/3/2017 2:53:18 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #4. USSR. The Caucuses.

I don't know the exact rule but my guess is is that Turkey is REAL close to coming in on the side of the axis. [&:]

[image]local://upfiles/31901/8A5BFE2F3F824B808AC3A100F3D03D8E.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/3/2017 2:54:13 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Axis #5. Weather.

Well, I must say that weather roll was a bit of a break for the allies.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/6498DDD9BD16422FB666805C53876208.jpg[/image]



Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/3/2017 11:13:14 PM)

Germany needs to get 4 German corps units on the USSR-Turkey border. That means the 4-3 Rumanian MTN won't count.

There are 4 German corps that could do that fairly easily, ... if the Russian units would just get out of the way,



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/4/2017 12:52:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

Germany needs to get 4 German corps units on the USSR-Turkey border. That means the 4-3 Rumanian MTN won't count.

There are 4 German corps that could do that fairly easily, ... if the Russian units would just get out of the way,
I have a feeling that Pat will force the issue even if they don't "voluntary" move aside. [:)]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/5/2017 12:14:49 AM)

Commentary: Yes, I plan on forcing the issue. It would have been easier if the weather had not turned.

MJ 43 i5
Options: Germany and Italy take combined actions. Japan takes a land action.

Italy moves a transport out to the E. Med and picks up the 4-1 GAR (stops in the 2-box). The Germans moved the Romanian CP to the Black Sea.

Italy searched in the E. Med and the rolls were 7/9 so no contact.

Two ground strikes, one in Siberia with the lowest strength JP bomber and one on your southernmost stack on the Iberian Peninsula (image below). Do you wish to intercept?

[image]local://upfiles/47448/F195F490C0614D7588C3536A8539B9F4.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/5/2017 3:57:04 PM)

Intercept with the USAF P-38F Lightening and the CVP with the highest air-to-air. Put theP-38F in the lead and stay until the status of the bomber is determined.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/6/2017 12:26:10 AM)

MJ43 i5 Ground Strikes.
The air combat was bloody. The US lost two plans, but no pilots. The Italians lost a fighter and the pilot. The bomber made it through and hit one target.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/090C4A98675049A0B493662F9B85602A.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/6/2017 12:35:11 AM)

Note, during the movement phase the German XX Corp moved into Batum and then back to the swamp, forcing the RU fleet to rebase. I made the decision for you that the best of the two options for rebasing was Odessa (the other port will likely be overrun in my next impulse.
The corp was disorganized and I had hoped to reorg it with air transport, but I had forgotten that it cost two reorg points during a combined. So, it remains flipped at this moment.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/C8F0BADCE1164B0580314229FBB1FFF7.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/7/2017 2:37:36 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #7. Actions.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/F734B46989214181B3308A344A4BBF6F.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/7/2017 2:39:05 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Allied #7. End of Turn Check.

Well, nothing from the allies to report this impulse. About all they did was to push a few units around on the map.

The turn continues.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/754AD77DCDDC43758C45237DB16AC985.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (11/7/2017 2:40:05 AM)

Turn 23. May/June 1943. Axis #9. Weather.

Fighting weather returns ... which isn't good news for the allies, especially the Soviets.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/FF188A151FFF4624A2812DEEABA6B14D.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  96 97 [98] 99 100   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.953125