warspite1 -> RE: Four years later... (11/5/2017 7:21:19 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RFalvo69 Warspite, I'm frankly amazed by how you do fail to grasp, over and over, the simplest of points - even those that you affirm to have grasped. To recap (again). After four years (not three months, not six months, not one year, not two years, but four years) this is the situation: Bugs My task list is completely up-to-date. Sadly, the list is still rather daunting to look at. I’ll be going over it yet again to identify things that deserve to be corrected prior to my assault on the NetPlay bugs. [Well, good to know...] NetPlay I’m still holding back to making any serious changes to the code to fix NetPlay-specific bugs. But I am assembling all the notes on bugs and saved games to accompany them. Missing Optional Rules & Half Map Scenarios Nothing new in October. AI Opponent (AIO) Nothing new in October. Are you even vaguely aware that we are not talking about a game which is "80-90% there"? What we are talking about is a program still totally up in the air, sold four years ago while still totally up in the air, and whose propaganda - both from four years ago and today - PRESENTS AS ****ING COMPLETE. At which point you lost track of the fact that both the game official page, here, and the tutorials on YT present a product which does exists only in some imaginary alternate reality? A product which could very possibly never be finished in any sane meaning of the word, while at the same time WitP: AE, WitE, WitW etc. are constantly refined and improved after working right out of the box in the first place? A product for which we don't even have and never had an official bug list, forcing the players to discover them when their game explodes? (and we are not talking about a game usually completed in 2-3 hours) A product that FORCED the buyer to buy the physical version for $150 until the fiasco was understood in its whole, humongous magnitude, and all of sudden buying the physical version was no more mandatory? A product for which Matrix never even showed the decency to refund at least the physical expense? (the idea of flatly admitting the fiasco being firmly rooted in science fiction... "Beloved" they called this abortion on the front page only a few weeks ago...) Some people may like to eat bad seafood and get salmonella. Good for them! (dunno... maybe they do know "workarounds"...) But, as Stanley Kubrick once said, "Even if some philosophers try to convince people that all reality is subjective, there is a world, out there, where everyone of us lives". And in this world MWiF is a shameful albatross around Matrix's neck. We can continue this debate for pages and pages, and for days and days. This won't change the cold reality we will face next month: Missing Optional Rules & Half Map Scenarios Nothing new in November. AI Opponent (AIO) Nothing new in November. Game finally finished as intended! Are you kidding me? Instructions for a refund In your dreams. And this is the objective world we all live in. Everything else is bullshit: accepting it will only mean that we are open to accept more bullshit - because... why next time we should behave differently? Have made myself clear this time? warspite1 Yes, perfectly clear. You clearly fail to understand something so basic, so simple. So I will ask you the same questions that PorcelainBus was asked and would not answer (for obvious reasons): quote:
quote: Why are you rushing to the defence of those who are deserving of blame? Let's start here. What exactly do you think I am defending. And please provide the quote(s). quote:
quote: you don't get that you seem like a sycophant Where did that come from? Again, please be exact, who and what am I displaying sycophancy towards and please provide the quotes that show this? quote:
quote: when you start attacking the op You may want to look at the order of things here, although to be honest, if I cannot make you understand the basic points above then this may be a step too far but lets see where we get to. It is so disappointing that people who take part in a debate don't have the courtesy to read what others have written.
|
|
|
|