Unity of Command II

Unity of Command II (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion

Message

Yogi the Great -> Unity of Command II (5/19/2019 11:23:02 AM)
Unity of Command II Announced Uniy of Command II

ncc1701e -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/19/2019 3:14:47 PM)
Nice, the new FOW mechanism looks interesting to play. An example here: https://steamcommunity.com/games/809230/announcements/detail/1737734445475260089

demyansk -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/19/2019 3:37:22 PM)
I am getting this one asap

AleRonin -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/19/2019 4:32:40 PM)
Question: which are the differences respect Panzer Corps?

MrsWargamer -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/19/2019 4:50:11 PM)
I think Panzer Corps is a lower echelon on the cale of action. Like comparing bnattalion/regimnent with division and corps. That's me recollecting, and not taking the time to actually go look :) I mentioned this game earlier. I'm thinking of getting it myself.

Kuokkanen -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/19/2019 8:40:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AleRonin Question: which are the differences respect Panzer Corps? Panzer Corps has more variety of units and focus is on having a right collection of units against right enemy units: rock-paper-scissors. Unity of Command has less different units. Main ones are: infantry, mechanized, tank with some variations (reinforced with ATG or heavy tanks) and little else (jäger, cavalry). Focus is on maneuver, encirclement, and securing/denying supply lines. Both are good games in little different ways. I recommend you to look at game play videos on YouTube and also make a comparison to Order of Battle.

AleRonin -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/20/2019 7:34:15 AM)
Thanks for the feedbacks!

Rising-Sun -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/20/2019 10:08:15 PM)
Look interesting, too bad there isn't one for the Pacific Campaign.

ncc1701e -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/21/2019 11:16:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rising-Sun Look interesting, too bad there isn't one for the Pacific Campaign. They would need to develop a naval engine first.

Kuokkanen -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/21/2019 6:06:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ncc1701e quote: ORIGINAL: Rising-Sun Look interesting, too bad there isn't one for the Pacific Campaign. They would need to develop a naval engine first. Huh, really? [&:] Here I thought they would only need new counters and stats for the ships [8\|]

Infierno -> RE: Unity of Command II (5/21/2019 8:46:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kuokkanen quote: ORIGINAL: ncc1701e quote: ORIGINAL: Rising-Sun Look interesting, too bad there isn't one for the Pacific Campaign. They would need to develop a naval engine first. Huh, really? [&:] Here I thought they would only need new counters and stats for the ships [8\|] All you need to do is play the naval DLCs for Order of Battle (or that other new Pacific General esque game) and you'll see why reskinning a land warfare game into a naval warfare game is generally a bad idea.

Page: [1]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.921875