RE: OT: Corona virus (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message


BBfanboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 12:36:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn


https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/01/24/officials-confirm-novel-coronavirus-in-nepali-man-who-returned-from-wuhan-earlier-this-month

"Dr Hemanta Chandra Ojha, an official at the Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, said that samples from a 31-year-old Nepali student who had returned from Wuhan, China earlier this month, had come back positive for the new virus from a World Health Organisation laboratory in Hong Kong. The novel coronavirus originated in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province."

"The hospital had taken specimens—throat swabs and blood samples—from the patient and sent it to the WHO’s Collaborating Centre in Hong Kong on Tuesday."




Good find, MakeeLearn. And the Iranians and Pakistanis?

ETA: Found a good article published 3 hours ago in the Wall Street Journal. Paywall, sorry. But there do appear to be some (until today) issues with access to appropriate diagnostics. There are also some models that show that there is a high probability of between 11,000 and 41,000 cases in Iran, nearly all unreported.

I just heard on TV News that the Vice President and Health Minister of Iran are among the infected. I am not sure how that info leaked, and I am not sure if that would make them more or less likely to admit they have a problem. Secrecy about things like this makes no sense to me - no one should be embarrassed that a new virus got into the population and no responsible government should pretend it isn't happening or avoid talking about reasonable personal precautions. Coordinated international response is called for, including rich nations helping poor ones beat this thing so it doesn't come back around.




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 12:37:40 AM)

Iran

Relief International

https://www.ri.org/irans-fight-against-the-coronavirus/




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 12:56:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn


https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/01/24/officials-confirm-novel-coronavirus-in-nepali-man-who-returned-from-wuhan-earlier-this-month

"Dr Hemanta Chandra Ojha, an official at the Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, said that samples from a 31-year-old Nepali student who had returned from Wuhan, China earlier this month, had come back positive for the new virus from a World Health Organisation laboratory in Hong Kong. The novel coronavirus originated in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province."

"The hospital had taken specimens—throat swabs and blood samples—from the patient and sent it to the WHO’s Collaborating Centre in Hong Kong on Tuesday."




Good find, MakeeLearn. And the Iranians and Pakistanis?

ETA: Found a good article published 3 hours ago in the Wall Street Journal. Paywall, sorry. But there do appear to be some (until today) issues with access to appropriate diagnostics. There are also some models that show that there is a high probability of between 11,000 and 41,000 cases in Iran, nearly all unreported.

I just heard on TV News that the Deputy Prime Minister and Health Minister of Iran are among the infected. I am not sure how that info leaked, and I am not sure if that would make them more or less likely to admit they have a problem. Secrecy about things like this makes no sense to me - no one should be embarrassed that a new virus got into the population and no responsible government should pretend it isn't happening or avoid talking about reasonable personal precautions. Coordinated international response is called for, including rich nations helping poor ones beat this thing so it doesn't come back around.


Yeah. Both of those high ranking officials' sickness were cited in the WSJ article. The article also touched on how the promotion of religious pilgrimages in Qom and elsewhere are likely contributing to spread of the disease. But, of course, the Ayatollahs certainly don't want to crimp folks' comings and goings to mosques to control disease.

The last thing the Iranian government is is a responsible government that is responsive to the needs or wants of their peoples. So all bets are off there.




Footslogger -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 12:57:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn


https://kathmandupost.com/national/2020/01/24/officials-confirm-novel-coronavirus-in-nepali-man-who-returned-from-wuhan-earlier-this-month

"Dr Hemanta Chandra Ojha, an official at the Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, said that samples from a 31-year-old Nepali student who had returned from Wuhan, China earlier this month, had come back positive for the new virus from a World Health Organisation laboratory in Hong Kong. The novel coronavirus originated in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province."

"The hospital had taken specimens—throat swabs and blood samples—from the patient and sent it to the WHO’s Collaborating Centre in Hong Kong on Tuesday."




Good find, MakeeLearn. And the Iranians and Pakistanis?

ETA: Found a good article published 3 hours ago in the Wall Street Journal. Paywall, sorry. But there do appear to be some (until today) issues with access to appropriate diagnostics. There are also some models that show that there is a high probability of between 11,000 and 41,000 cases in Iran, nearly all unreported.

I just heard on TV News that the Deputy Prime Minister and Health Minister of Iran are among the infected. I am not sure how that info leaked, and I am not sure if that would make them more or less likely to admit they have a problem. Secrecy about things like this makes no sense to me - no one should be embarrassed that a new virus got into the population and no responsible government should pretend it isn't happening or avoid talking about reasonable personal precautions. Coordinated international response is called for, including rich nations helping poor ones beat this thing so it doesn't come back around.


Leak: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcGyiFcFP5U




Zorch -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 1:15:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert
Economic downturns are also dangerous


Aye, they can be. I think we need to leaven our approach with moderation as a result, as many of the self-inflicted economic wounds could be prevented by limiting our overreaction. Example? My mother wanted to fly to California to visit some relatives there in March. But she is giving serious thought to cancelling her flight because someone from California was being treated in the same county that she is planning to visit. This sort of head-in-the-sand at all cost behavior x 330 million will not keep anyone demonstrably safer, but could set off an economic downturn.

I would argue that people will find others ways to spend their money if they can't travel. And if all avenues of spending are cutoff, they just might <shudder> save more and thereby stimulate investment.
Of course, the object of saving is to be able to spend more later. [8D]




Canoerebel -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 12:38:05 PM)

It looks like the situation in the USA and the rest of North America is pretty much the same as it was yesterday, while in some places things are worse (Iran, mostly).

It's interesting to watch the American news media go berserk.




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 1:06:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Designing RT-PCR primer sets that are specific to COVID-19 and only that virus (so as to not yield related viral false positives) is hard work and fraught with difficulty. Considering the fact that they've had the virus for what-one month?-I think they're doing the best they can in a difficult environment and time.


I would believe that, except that every other developed country got it done at capacity before us. In addition, it turns out that declaring an emergency here actually prevented everyone but CDC on moving forward with their own tests, which was somehow considered a good idea in a health emergency. [8|]




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 1:08:15 PM)

Now we have two geographically separated cases in California from apparent community spread, a community spread case in an Oregon school, a community spread case in a Washington school. Based on the experience of other countries so far, who knows how big these outbreaks actually are? Not us, because we've only had the capacity and guidelines to test folks from China while it breaks out across the world.

"With an increase in unknown origin cases and a change in testing guidelines across the country, CDC officials said they were hoping to have every state and local health department testing for the virus by the end of next week."

Yeah, I'm sure the virus will be fine with that.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 2:00:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
It's interesting to watch the American news media go berserk.


It sure doesn't take much these days, does it?




witpqs -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 2:27:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
It's interesting to watch the American news media go berserk.


It sure doesn't take much these days, does it?

I think in recent years it's their default state.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 4:36:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Now we have two geographically separated cases in California from apparent community spread, a community spread case in an Oregon school, a community spread case in a Washington school. Based on the experience of other countries so far, who knows how big these outbreaks actually are? Not us, because we've only had the capacity and guidelines to test folks from China while it breaks out across the world.

"With an increase in unknown origin cases and a change in testing guidelines across the country, CDC officials said they were hoping to have every state and local health department testing for the virus by the end of next week."

Yeah, I'm sure the virus will be fine with that.


I guess we could do what China did and just throw our hands up and 'diagnose' 'confirmed' cases without the benefit of a test. We could keep up with the numbers that way by rewriting our case criteria and lumping everything in to 'confirmed' cases without the benefit of actual...you know...knowledge or verifiable truth.




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 4:38:51 PM)

I realize my comments were snarky, but I'm frustrated. I have dependents who are very vulnerable to this illness based on the information so far.

We want verifiable truth, but we let the virus get ahead of us because of our testing limitations, even though we had a head start.




Zorch -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 5:01:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

I realize my comments were snarky, but I'm frustrated. I have dependents who are very vulnerable to this illness based on the information so far.

We want verifiable truth, but we let the virus get ahead of us because of our testing limitations, even though we had a head start.

The bottom line is that people who don't travel, or mix with people who do travel, are at low risk for contracting the virus. That's my safety blanket.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 6:33:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

I realize my comments were snarky, but I'm frustrated. I have dependents who are very vulnerable to this illness based on the information so far.

We want verifiable truth, but we let the virus get ahead of us because of our testing limitations, even though we had a head start.


We will have widespread testing primer kits tested and distributed by week's end. This for a novel virus that we had a ***** of a time getting out of a notoriously tight-fisted autocratic communist 'health' agency. We will likely have a fast-tracked vaccine in 3-4 months time as well, freakishly fast by any other historical standards.

I hear you in terms of the frustration re: your vulnerable dependents though and wish all of you the best.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 6:34:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch
The bottom line is that people who don't travel, or mix with people who do travel, are at low risk for contracting the virus. That's my safety blanket.


Doesn't the fact that nobody-and I mean nobody-wants to go anywhere near you act as a protective mechanism too? [:'(]




Zorch -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 6:44:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch
The bottom line is that people who don't travel, or mix with people who do travel, are at low risk for contracting the virus. That's my safety blanket.


Doesn't the fact that nobody-and I mean nobody-wants to go anywhere near you act as a protective mechanism too? [:'(]

I go about cleverly disguised as a Texas veterinarian, and dispense medical advice in his name.




rustysi -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 7:04:11 PM)

quote:

It looks like the situation in the USA and the rest of North America is pretty much the same as it was yesterday,


Well, for the U.S., with 8400 people of 'interest' to test and only 200 test kits, who knows?




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 8:26:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
We will likely have a fast-tracked vaccine in 3-4 months time as well, freakishly fast by any other historical standards.


Explain this one to me - I've heard Dr. Fauci multiple times say 12-18 months until a vaccine. How do you get 3-4?




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 8:29:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rustysi
Well, for the U.S., with 8400 people of 'interest' to test and only 200 test kits, who knows?


We're up to more than that now, but yeah that's where California was just a few days ago.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 8:58:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
We will likely have a fast-tracked vaccine in 3-4 months time as well, freakishly fast by any other historical standards.


Explain this one to me - I've heard Dr. Fauci multiple times say 12-18 months until a vaccine. How do you get 3-4?


https://time.com/5790545/first-covid-19-vaccine/

Novel technology by this company and others that can significantly decrease the time to human trials and, hopefully, market. But, yeah, a 'traditional' vaccine takes something like a year for anything other than seasonal influenza.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 9:06:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rustysi

quote:

It looks like the situation in the USA and the rest of North America is pretty much the same as it was yesterday,


Well, for the U.S., with 8400 people of 'interest' to test and only 200 test kits, who knows?


I think you might be confusing a use-and-discard 'test kit' (which nobody is using) with what the CDC has been hurriedly producing (Primer sets for RT-PCR). AFAIK, the bottleneck that is opening up is for primer sets for the COVID-19 virus. When used in a RT-PCR reaction, a primer set kit can do many, many, many samples.




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 9:20:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

https://time.com/5790545/first-covid-19-vaccine/

Novel technology by this company and others that can significantly decrease the time to human trials and, hopefully, market. But, yeah, a 'traditional' vaccine takes something like a year for anything other than seasonal influenza.


Yeah, that's exactly the same one Fauci's been talking about. The President was saying in the Wednesday briefing that a vaccine was "close". Fauci then stepped up and said while they are breaking vaccine development time records, it will be 12-18 months before it completes the initial human safety triels, then the second phase of human effectiveness trials, then gets manufactures in large enough numbers to matter. 12-18 months. Until then, hopefully Remdesivir will show some effect in that clinical trial. News from China indicates perhaps Chlorquine Phosphate or an AIDS drug called Liponavir/Ritonavir may have some effect too.

Regards,

- Erik





Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 9:36:14 PM)

I guess this is my main frustration in our response so far and it doesn't seem to come down to any limitations on data from China, but rather on our own bureaucracy and regulations and the idiocy that those often create, even when lives are at stake.

For comparison, one week ago the CDC was able to process 50-100 test per day and three or four states were able to test, no hospitals. At that point, largely due to the narrow testing criteria from the CDC (required travel to China) we had tested less than 500 cases. That's now gone up to about 500 per day at the CDC and hopefully all states can now test to some degree, but still no hospitals as far as I know. As far as I know, that's been partly held up by the (now fixed) problem with the emergency declaration stupidly requiring everyone to wait on the CDC, which was unable to get these kits working again quickly.

CDC was planning to start active surveillance back in early February. That was pushed back due to test issues, but restrictions weren't lifted on allowing others to work on their own test. As soon as these hurdles were cleared and limits lifted and testing definitions broadened, we started finding cases where folks were infected more than a week ago with no foreign links and people will unfortunately die because of these unnecessary delays.

Meanwhile, South Korea as an example had some testing with six hour turn-around available down to the hospital level as early as February 7th and has been running about 10,000 tests a day all through this last week. They didn't get anything more from China than we did to help get their testing online. My $.02, the horse has left the barn and hopefully there's still time to find it and put it back.

Regards,

- Erik




witpqs -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 10:02:59 PM)

My reading of the tea leaves, so to speak, is that testing will not stop worldwide spread of COVID-19, it will help with identifying those who catch it and are most vulnerable, thereby can benefit from most aggressive treatment.

Most of what I've heard about vaccines is a year is about the best case, usually a couple of years. Maybe some of the recent advances plus the priority of this situation will allow them to do it more quickly in this case. But, it's also my understanding that some viruses have simply never had a successful vaccine created against them.




Erik Rutins -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 10:08:27 PM)

Right, testing doesn't stop it getting in, but having a big testing capacity and broad guidelines allows you to catch an outbreak before it becomes so widespread that containment is no longer possible. That can buy a lot of time in a situation like this when there's much we still don't know about this virus.




witpqs -> RE: OT: Corona virus (2/29/2020 10:14:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Right, testing doesn't stop it getting in, but having a big testing capacity and broad guidelines allows you to catch an outbreak before it becomes so widespread that containment is no longer possible. That can buy a lot of time in a situation like this when there's much we still don't know about this virus.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, I don't think testing can do that in this case at this point in the process. I believe - think - and I am no expert, that things are well past when that was possible. I include in my thinking the notion that "if the kits were available X weeks sooner", because the current state of the epidemic/pandemic is a few weeks beyond what we see today. What we see today is really where things were a few weeks ago (due to incubation period, reporting lags, etc).




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Corona virus (3/1/2020 10:08:46 AM)

First coronavirus deaths reported in US, Thailand and Australia

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/coronavirus-outbreak-03-01-20-intl-hnk/index.html
video

"First US death reported: President Donald Trump spoke to reporters about the latest coronavirus developments, including the death of a Washington state patient."




Canoerebel -> RE: OT: Corona virus (3/1/2020 11:25:40 AM)

Reported cases in US up 9 from yesterday, with one death.

One news outlet reporting 50 sick! in a nursing facility (suggesting to any reader that all of them have the Coronavirus, but only those who read carefully find out none are confirmed yet, they're being tested).

Other outlets reporting panic will set in (Target and Wal-Mar shelves bare by April 1), which encourages people to fulfill that prophecy. Because of reports like this, panic buying/hoarding will more likely begin this week.





MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Corona virus (3/1/2020 11:53:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Reported cases in US up 9 from yesterday, with one death.

One news outlet reporting 50 sick! in a nursing facility (suggesting to any reader that all of them have the Coronavirus, but only those who read carefully find out none are confirmed yet, they're being tested).

Other outlets reporting panic will set in (Target and Wal-Mar shelves bare by April 1), which encourages people to fulfill that prophecy. Because of reports like this, panic buying/hoarding will more likely begin this week.




SADDLE UP MEN!!!



[image]local://upfiles/55056/475583593C3649C5823F3CF164287D4A.gif[/image]




obvert -> RE: OT: Corona virus (3/1/2020 11:59:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Reported cases in US up 9 from yesterday, with one death.

One news outlet reporting 50 sick! in a nursing facility (suggesting to any reader that all of them have the Coronavirus, but only those who read carefully find out none are confirmed yet, they're being tested).

Other outlets reporting panic will set in (Target and Wal-Mar shelves bare by April 1), which encourages people to fulfill that prophecy. Because of reports like this, panic buying/hoarding will more likely begin this week.



There are very sensationalist reports, and there are some very good, very objective and informational reports. Not sure what you're pointing out here other than some media are less responsible than others? [:)]

People don't need help from the media to panic and buy out stores. Every hurricane warning in the SE can confirm people panic/prepare for the worst. Is that such a bad thing though? Why not hoard a bit and make sure that if lockdowns occur you have what you need?

There is so much internal movement and so many without health insurance in the States I have a strong feeling this is going to get very bad very soon there. I'm worried for my parents who are both in high risk categories, my mom being a smoker and my dad a polio survivor experiencing some post-polio syndrome symptoms. I'll be speaking to them tonight to encourage them to reduce their outside activities until we see how this develops. The cases in WA are very close since they're both in Portland.

Here I'm in close proximity to hundreds of random strangers a day on the tube and more at work (in a school) so I'm not feeling so secure either. Hopefully if numbers increase schools will close for a time and limit the least hygienic of us from passing the germs around. And let me stay home. [;)]




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.765625