Potentially daft question on CVEs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message


Encircled -> Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/13/2020 12:43:42 PM)

I know its a max of five air groups in a normal CV, but is there a limit to the number of sqds on an CVE, or is it five as well?




Lowpe -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/13/2020 1:33:33 PM)

Good question, I don't know.

The most I have had on at one time is 3: fighter, bomber, recon. Most of the time I run only 1 squadron.




RangerJoe -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/13/2020 3:29:12 PM)

The question is, why put that many units on such a fragile ship?




geofflambert -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/13/2020 4:15:36 PM)

If they can't carry torpedoes you don't need two kinds of bombers.




Lokasenna -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/13/2020 8:09:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

If they can't carry torpedoes you don't need two kinds of bombers.


ASW duty, but realistically the TBM/TBF is better at this as well. Only really necessary to use SBDs in this role in 1942/1943.




BBfanboy -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/13/2020 9:48:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

I know its a max of five air groups in a normal CV, but is there a limit to the number of sqds on an CVE, or is it five as well?

I think the limit is five as well - useful if you are gathering fragments of units after a big carrier battle, or if you want small batches of planes for Search/ASW/Recon.




traskott -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/19/2020 9:16:24 AM)

.




traskott -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/19/2020 9:17:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

If they can't carry torpedoes you don't need two kinds of bombers.


ASW duty, but realistically the TBM/TBF is better at this as well. Only really necessary to use SBDs in this role in 1942/1943.

Didn't know this. Why?

Thanks!




RangerJoe -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/19/2020 11:11:08 AM)

Better range . . .




traskott -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/19/2020 11:35:31 AM)

Ouch!. Yes. [8|]

Thanks.




BBfanboy -> RE: Potentially daft question on CVEs (5/19/2020 3:18:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: traskott

Ouch!. Yes. [8|]

Thanks.

TBF/TBM also carry a radar set, IIRC.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
7.203125