(Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns



Message


Hortlund -> (7/10/2001 8:44:00 PM)

quote:

Originally posted by AmmoSgt: I would like to take this opportunity to point out some simple statistics ...[SNIP]
While I do not dispute your facts and statistics, I would like to make a couple of observations: 1) The allies on the western front had total air supremacy, not merely air superiority. The effects of this on German ability to maneuver, attack or defend has been well documented by many. Simple fact of the matter is that any German division trying to move during daylight would take approx 20% losses from allied air attacks. 2) Allied artillery were in a whole different class than the German artillery. More guns, better guns and more ammunition. 3) The Allies outnumbered the Germans. More men, more tanks, more planes, more guns. 4) 1-3 above is in my opinion the main reason why the allied were able to drive from Normandy almost all the way to Berlin with 80.000 killed or captured vs 1.000.000 Germans killed or captured. This became increasingly apparent the longer the war dragged on. In 45, when any US unit came upon a defensive German position they stayed put and called in arty or air to turn the defensive positions to dust before moving in to capture the few survivors. 5) I do not think that it is fair to use these statistics to claim that US soldiers were better disciplined or had higher morale. To me, it is a simple fact that the war in the west was fought and won with arty and airpower. 6) The Bulge, one look at a map shows that it is a defenders dream and an attackers nightmare. Sure it was 27 German divisions, but most of these divisions were third rate at best, and the remainders had practically no fuel. Sure it was a short distance to the German supply depots, but a) these depots were practically empty, and b) the supplies had to be transported through roads that can only be described as a logistical nightmare. The supplies might as well have been located on the far side of the moon. Steve [ July 10, 2001: Message edited by: Panzerjaeger Hortlund ]




sven -> (7/10/2001 8:52:00 PM)

quote:

Originally posted by Marder: I´m from austria (which was a part of the third reich) and my grandfathers served in the german army. Both don´t talk a lot about that. They don´t talk about heros in their platoons or their killing rate, the only thing my grand father said, that three man of 150 in his company survived the last 3 month of the war (the most were between 14 and 18). He was one of the lucky. No heros, no glory, he has seen many colleges which were transformed into mood after hitten by artillery-shells. And they don´t tell stories about american tanks which they destroyed herorically with their panzerfausts, one after the other. ("in the end we were afraid to shoot with them, because some were damaged/sabotaged and some died because of exploded panzerfaust´s when you fired it") And what is fact, the allies won the war(thank god, i´m glad about that). And the guy who give up this post is in my opinion someone who has never studied war and read his articels in right corner magazines. Sorry about writing in this way, but i wanna show you out there, that there are people in germany or austria who are not thinking in his way! I´m happy that i can play such a game at the computer and not in reality in the steppes of russia or somewhere else! Marder
Marder I would like to thank you for your post. Your English was fine, and is far better than my German. You hit a very important point. regards, sven




Supervisor -> (7/10/2001 9:52:00 PM)

To George PJ Hortlund & Marder thanks for you well-informed & reasoned posts. For those who like to disparage or downplay the US Army's effectiveness in WW2 I suggest reading "The GI Offensive in Europe" by Peter Mansoor. This book puts to rest the myth that the US Army won only through the force of superior numbers & firepower. It also compares the relative strengths & weakness of the US Army against those of the German Army. Worthwhile reading!




AmmoSgt -> (7/10/2001 10:21:00 PM)

Hortland OK .. I am just saying that the US Army has a claim to be the Best in WW2 at least after mid 43.. and certainly by June 44. By Mid 43 we were beating the opponents and causing many more casualties than we were taking. And the Germans were surrendering in droves in both the east and the west fronts.. Yes the US defended the Contenintal US much more effectively than the Germans Defend Fortress Europa .. thats what Good Armies do, they defend the homeland, then they remove the threat .. The Germans declared war on US we were neutral .. we were inching towards war because the Germans were sinking neutral unarmed US vessels ... But even with that we held back ... First you defend the Homeland, the US Army and the Navy did that well .. why didn't the German Army do that the German Navy? ... same Ocean same size east to west as west to east .. Don't complain about the Americans responding to the German declaring war by defending their own country better than the Germans defended theirs .. I know this may sound a little silly to talk about defending the home land .. it seems funny some how to Actually think that the German Army could actually even Attack America well ..what did declaring war mean when Germany Declared .. that they were just going to be mad at us ? No it meant they wished to conquer the US, just like they had Conqured other nations they had declared war on .. and if the American Army was so bad why did it only take us about 11 months to have effective ground forces engaged in both across the Atlantic/ Mediterainian and across the Pacfic at Gudacanal .. That what real Armies do, they hunt down and destroy any threat to the Homeland ... if it does sound so funny to think Germany could do the same then quit thinking that they were a serious Professional Army .. they were political hacks and Officers by right of birth, with no Global reach to back the propaganda, and they were bullies ...Not Profesional West Point and Annapols Trained Professional Officers in command Of an Army not demoralized with a high suicide rate from shooting civilians and other "mud people" Wasting resources exterminating folks for racial reasons.. Yeah we had a Navy and an Airforce both of which did real good after that little sneak attack, and on very short notice ... just months after Pearl Harbor the Japanese Carriers were at the Bottom of the Pacific and the Happy time in the Atlantic was all but over .. the Point is it takes more than just sneak attack and a couple of decent combat systems to win a war.. You need troops that will fight not surrender, you need a nation that will back the Troops, You need professional Officer that put their troops welfare above political advancement and political expedency, and you need to be able to defend your own Borders, the US had all that. The Germany Army was sold out from day one by it's own Officer Corp that was more concerned with Personal position and looting and raping the locals .. small wonder the troops followed suite .. The Officers that new Better died trying to overthrow their own Goverment or switched sides Like Paullus..Yeah Ok the germans made a couple thousand decent tanks .. that does not make an Army Great . Succesfully defending the Homeland does ..Successfully removing any Threat to the Homeland Does ... and doing it with a certain regard for human diginity and Military Honor does..The US Army did all that .. the German Army did not




Christopher -> (7/10/2001 10:58:00 PM)

quote:

Originally posted by Marder: I´m from austria (which was a part of the third reich) and my grandfathers served in the german army. Both don´t talk a lot about that. They don´t talk about heros in their platoons or their killing rate, the only thing my grand father said, that three man of 150 in his company survived the last 3 month of the war (the most were between 14 and 18). He was one of the lucky. No heros, no glory, he has seen many colleges which were transformed into mood after hitten by artillery-shells. And they don´t tell stories about american tanks which they destroyed herorically with their panzerfausts, one after the other. ("in the end we were afraid to shoot with them, because some were damaged/sabotaged and some died because of exploded panzerfaust´s when you fired it") And what is fact, the allies won the war(thank god, i´m glad about that). And the guy who give up this post is in my opinion someone who has never studied war and read his articels in right corner magazines. Sorry about writing in this way, but i wanna show you out there, that there are people in germany or austria who are not thinking in his way! I´m happy that i can play such a game at the computer and not in reality in the steppes of russia or somewhere else! Marder
Couldn't agree more... ...sadly not enough people share this attitude towards war and ridiculous discussions such as this one.




Belisarius -> (7/10/2001 11:55:00 PM)

quote:

Originally posted by Warrior: Unless you'd prefer it that way, I suggest you remember that without the Americans there wouldn't be a Europe. Just a 1000-year Reich. But then, Europeans voted in the European Union, so it seems dictatorship is something desired.
Ouch, Warrior. That was uncalled for. And I suppose you don't vote for Congress or Senate? ;) Otherwise, I completely agree with you.




Jaques Rico -> (7/11/2001 12:11:00 AM)

Terror, :) there are a bit to much posts to answer, so I need to be selective. Sorry about that, but onlike Sven, I cant affort the time to live on the board. @ Darroch You want to know my point? Well then, I am just saying that despite american beliefs their soldiers werent the best and they werent definitly no heroes. I didnt say, that there were heroes on the german side, but the american opinion they won the wars alone and because of the superiority of their GI´s and marines is just plain crazy. And if you look at the competence of the elite units the germans stood almost ever better than their adversaries. About the later units of the "Volksturm" which consisted mainly of 14 to 18 year old youth, there isnt much to say, if people like AmmoSgt and Sven think, these untrained kids were the average german soldiers and then blame their ability to stand up and die heroically in a lost war, i can only wonder about a certain mental disfuncionality. And about the american belief of winning the war singlehandedly, WW2 wasnt lost in the west, it was lost in the east. Practically it was lost in the moment the attack on Russia began, because Germany would never had enough soldiers to occupy such a big country. It was simply a logistical impossibility. And the american contribution to the result of WW1 is even less. But I have to congratulate you on your knowledge about history. That is, as Ive often encountered it, not a common US trait. Just maybe a little correction, the treaty of Versailles is much more responsible for WW2 than the mentioned "Dolchstoßlegende". If Wilson would have been able to persuade the French and British to a more fair and tolerant treaty, we might never have seen a Third Reich. I personally doubt that Hitler would have been able to rise to power if that act had not created, or at least empowered, the revisionist tendencies in Germany. @ Wild Bill At least you said "the Allies" and not "the Americans". And to answer your question, the simplest answer would be: "Because they had the bigger economy." But you may of course say, that they had american wonder soldiers on their side, the best on the planet and in all the neightbouring galaxies. Well, Iam a bit unfair now, Sven would speak so, but you would certainly put it in a bit more eloquent words. @ El Vito Thank you, you are a very good example to prove my point! @ Warhorse and Paul Vebber First something for Warhorse, I didnt say that the IIIj was the only tank with armored skirts, in fact I mentioned some others, I only said, that the IIIh didnt have any. And that is a fact. In the encyclopedia of Spwaw he is displayed with them, but he never had them. And I said that for that reason it is not possible to see if a system has armored skirts and if the game calculates them in. In my opinion there are to much first kills by side hits on such systems. Ok, on to Penetration tables for Paul. I looked into the Tiger book for the correct penetration values of the Tiger tanks. Tiger I 0m/500m/1000m/1500m/2000m/2500m Book na/140/122/108/ 92/ 82 Spwaw 162/151/138/126/113/100 Tiger II Book na/205/186/170/154/140 Spwaw 232/221/207/194/181/168 So you see, there are some discrepancies. My data is from "Wa Prüf 6, 1944, technische Daten von Panzerkampfwagen". So that are the orginial values determined by the german developers. Maybe you could look up how your source has determined the penetration values, perhaps they used a different steel... @5th Recon Ok, great hero, just a little question. In all the Vietnam movies the american platoons move in a very tight line, one soldier after the other, even when they went into battle. (The movie platoon springs to mind, and some others.) My question now, is that just fiction or were they truely stupid enough to act in such a way? :) Given from what Ive seen the amis do here in NATO-exercises it is possible. @ AmmoSgt Answer your email, or I have to assume your challenge was a fake. @ Del No, iam not confused. YOu can find the datas about the battle of Tebourba 01.-03.12.1942 in the Tiger book. It was the first battle for Tiger tanks in North Afrika. @ George aka 2 f Sagen wir doch einfach, daß mir diese amerikanische: "We are the best"-Altitude ein wenig auf die Nerven ging. Ein bißchen Zündeln muß erlaubt sein, zumindest solange man über Svens Niveau bleibt. (Sorry about the 2 short german sentences.) And George, if you dont know about german army activities outside our borders, that isnt so amazingly. There were some occasions, but since you nearly never hear about them in the media they are easy to miss. I will perhaps later this evening post a little list, to correct that assumption. @ Panzerjäger Horlund Just to your first anecdote, were the infantry units in it perhaps "Volksturm"-units? I think its unfair to expect great military miracles from 14 to 18 year old youth who hadnt barely a basic training and no experienced officers to lead them on. And about the second episode, well the man was clearly a competent soldier. @ Last but not least Jeff Norton And thanks for your opinions. Ok, on to it. I think that Germany would have lost the war even without the american intervention. It would have taken a bit longer for the russian war machine to overwhelm Germanys by sheer number but sooner or later they would have succeded. Since that would have meant, that Germany would have been ruled by Stalin (Even that would have been better than Hitlers victory, I believe.) I cant be to sorry that that was not the case. However Germany didnt lose because of some american super heroes who rose to the occasion. You might remember Korea or Vietnam, some occasions where that american trait wasnt victorious. You went over the combat course with rucksack and gun? Respect. We did of course the same, but the americans who were there at the same time went over the course barehanded and without their rucksacks. After that they gloated about being 10 to 15 seconds faster than us. I hope you can understand why we were a bit miffed at them. And if I then have to read from people live Sven who sounds like he won WW1/2 and 3 alone, I hope you can understand that my sarcasm then shows. Some facts about Desert Storm. Did you know that more than half of the american rockets malfunctioned before they reached their goals? And that another 20% of the remaining rocket clearly missed? Of course the outcome was secure, because the Americans simply shot enough rockets to make up for the losses. I just think it was not very efficient. :) Or did you know that they needed to call in german mine clearers to remove the last mines, which their own people coudnt find? You never hear about such facts in the media. In america maybe because they dont want to diminish their own success and in Germany because they dont want that the population knows that we have army units outside the borders. Each army has it faults, Jeff. I can easily name some of the german. I only hated it when some Americans carried on, like theirs would be spotless. I hope you understand. Best wishes JR




sven -> (7/11/2001 12:38:00 AM)

Sagen wir doch einfach, daß mir diese amerikanische: "We are the best"-Altitude ein wenig auf die Nerven ging. Ein bißchen Zündeln muß erlaubt sein, zumindest solange man über Svens Niveau bleibt. --------------------------------------------- I sure do hate that you felt the need to hide behind a language barrier to take a swipe at me. Saying that the Germans(never the 'N' word)were not super men is not the same as saying that the Americans were. You sir are constructing a straw man.(and not even doing it very well) I challenge you to find a post where I say that the Allies(including America) were Uber Soldiers. failing that I think that you are reading far too much into my satire on Power Gamer. Have it your way. I refuse to say that the US was inferior to the germans because we refused to fight in the way they would have liked. We(the Allies including and indeed mostly on land Ivan) beat you, and it does not matter how we did it. I would rather we destroy every enemy village by artillery and air power rather than wipe out a generation of our men by being 'macho' and standing toe to toe with you guys. If you really wanted to be a world power you would have looked at the writing on the wall when you elected Darth Shicklegruber to office in the first place. Memo to Germans: picking on either the US or USSR alone was not very smart, but picking on both of us was well.... STUPID! Your position is so vapid as to be laughable. regards,(and best wishes) sven




gdpsnake -> (7/11/2001 12:51:00 AM)

For every 'negative' American comment, I can think of an Audie Murphy. For every 'positive' German comment, I can think of a concentration camp. War brings out the best and worst in people yet none of the best can erase a single worst. Pray God we never see another war no matter where or how fought. I did my 20+ and thank others who served in any capacity but the military is no different than any other profession because they're all run by people and people are both good and brave, bad and cowardly. But enough of the 'hook' JR, it's just a game and a great one! Everything can't be perfect. Fight the good fight with what you get! Now where's that Pacific War game? 2002? So long a wait.............




Nemesis -> (7/11/2001 12:54:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by AmmoSgt: The simple fact is that from Normandy to Berlin the US took 80,000 Dead or Captured while inflicting over 1,000,000 Killed or Captured on the
When looking at those number you have to remember few things: After the breakout from Normandy, ALOT of german troops got surrounded in wester France (Hitler wanted them to "Stand and Die"). I don't remember the actual figures, but it was alot. I don't remember that did those troops saw real action (some did). They could have just waited for the war to end (Like the germans in the Channel Islands did). Some of the german bases in western France were captured, but they were 100% surrounded & cut-off. And German troops surrendered en masse during the last weeks of the war. I remember reading 100.000+ prisoners taken at some of the last battles. No, I have no intention to diminish the american accomplishment. But one does have to remember the situation back then. As to the "drive to Berlin"... Allies never reached Berlin. They had agreed that it was for the Soviets.




Paul Vebber -> (7/11/2001 3:13:00 AM)

Lorrin Bird and Robert Livingston have spent literally decades researching material for their work on WW2 ballistics. They have taken various prinary sources such as you quote and compared armor quality and testing techniques to get a "apples to apples" comparison of armor and projectiles. Period tests were done on different armor types by different countries to diferent penetration stadards. How does your source define penetration? As a 'full through crack' or deformation of a backing plate, or passage of the projectile in whole? What percentage of the time did such penetration occur? 20, 50, 80? Simply stating a gun "penetrates XXX mm of armor" is meaniingless unless you define the quality of armor and the percentage of the time the pentration occurs. SP:WaW values are based on US 240 BHN rolled test plate penetration based on US Navy Ballistic Limit velocity (50% probabilitythat a good portion of the projectile passes completely through the plate). I have no doubt your values are authentic, but they have little to do with how the rounds would actually perform in combat against other country's vehicles that are are not armored with German test plate. To determine that you have to use a common standard, not simply what each country publishes based on their own widely varying test proceedures. Lorrin and Roberts Figures for 88L56 and 88L71 APCBC: .....100...500...1000...1500...2000...2500 L56..162...151....138....126....116...106 L71..232...219....204....190....176...164 All penetration in SPWaW has a +/- 10% random factor on it so the differences between the SP:WaW values and the "standard" values derived over many years are typically within this error range. Samller caliber shells diverge more becasue of the single range degradation equation the game uses. As to effect of "skirts" how effective should they be? Based on what criteria? How you determine if they are undamaged? Or only partially present? You say you don't like a reduction from 31 of 35 to 16 of 37 in teh test I did, wht would make you happy? 0 of 37, 8 of 37? And based on what. AS shaped charges got more powerful (like the one the M9 uses) the little skirts offered less and less protection. And once combat was joned, were rarely totally intact, allowing close range shots at vulnerable areas. If skirts did so much to defeat shaped charges, why where they not used extensively by other countries? Because they just were't that effective... [ July 10, 2001: Message edited by: Paul Vebber ]




Nikademus -> (7/11/2001 3:28:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by A_B: Silly me. As a relative newcomer, i put up a post about spotting in bad weather and at night, and how the game preferences could be tweaked to make it more realistic, especially since infantry use bad weather to their advantage, and 6.0 offers better inf. simulation. If this has been discussed before, i missed it. As a former 11B in the 82nd Abn., I know that weather and darkness will vastly affect inf. combat. Only problem is, almost no one wants to discuss the topic or enlighten me. A few did, including some of the Matrix folks (but hey, they're great guys, even though Mike W. response was a little snooty). Instead, some bozo starts a thread like this one, and people respond in droves. Human nature i guess. From now on, I'll start any new thread, in which i have a serious question or discussion topic with the following; The US Army sucks, always has, always will. Germans walked all over them any time they wanted to. Tigers are way better than Sherman’s, mano-y-mano. The loss at Stalingrad and Kursk was a fluke. I trained with US soldiers in Germany once, and they were all transvestites. The U.S. was once mean to Indians, and even now doesn't let them to open up Casino’s on their reservations. The only reason I'd ever consider sleepy with an American woman is because I'm too lazy to masturbate. The only life form that could possibly be considered lower than an American is a Californian. Oh, and by the way, what do you think of the way SPWAW handles spotting in poor weather and darkness?
To quote the kid From Indiana Jones and the temple of Doom "Ha ha.....u funny!" :p I've been asking and clamoring for a more graphical based change for WAW to help simulate night combat but have gotten little response so i know how you feel. It would be nice for "night battles" to look that way on the screen (instead of looking like its daylight) I hear Talonsoft did something like that with "Rising Sun" and was pretty neat to look at I've played a few low visibility scenerios and as far as LOS goes, it seems fairly realistic.....in some places you might be able to see a couple hundred yards, others, nothing beyond the nose of your face (well, 50 yards at least) what tweaks were you suggesting?




Paul Vebber -> (7/11/2001 3:33:00 AM)

IF you turn movement radius to "B" you get a 'darkened' backround with the moves lit up in lighter color - I think it switches in "night" games. That is teh best we can do in SP:WAW...




Nikademus -> (7/11/2001 3:37:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by Wild Bill: Hey Jaques! Nice to have you here. Your views are interesting. All I can say is that the Allies won World War II. Can you believe that? I wonder how they did it. Any thoughts on that subject? Wild Bill
My old high school buddy sure did. He attributed the Allied victories in WWI and II too two simple reasons Men and Material the allies, (and the Russians in particular) simply had more men and materials. Germany did nothing wrong. If only they'd made a few different choices. Things would be different. Its nice to have a simple view on a complex subject :p In Jacques defence though, i will admit, that these days the flapjack of history has most definately "flipped" over and these days its the Germans (and the Japanese) that tend to get degraded. On other boards there have been similar type threads which have stated that the USA was awesome and Russians or no Russians, once the US was established on the continent it would have been "lights out" for the Wehrmacht. The Japanese Army was if anything, held in contempt. A 1945 "what if" war between the victorious USA and Soviet Union held similar views. The US and US airforce was totally superior, we'd have kicked their asses easily etc etc. Needless to say i found myself in the awkward position of being devil's advocate against such unbridled patrioism and underestimation of the problem. After years of defending the US and Allies against the "men and materials" put down, it felt "wierd" to say the least History really is like a flapjack, is'nt it? (and personally i think this whole USA vs, Germany vs, thang is silly but some of the discussion allows good thoughtful dialogue so sometimes i play along)




Belisarius -> (7/11/2001 3:38:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by sven: If you really wanted to be a world power you would have looked at the writing on the wall when you elected Darth Shicklegruber to office in the first place. Memo to Germans: picking on either the US or USSR alone was not very smart, but picking on both of us was well.... STUPID! Your position is so vapid as to be laughable. regards,(and best wishes) sven
My second replay that will stray off the target...apologies everyone, in advance. First, I want to make it clear as crystal pepsi (heh, is it still available, btw?) that I agree with Sven and his replies here. I wish I had that ability to get my thoughts down. ;) So it's time to veer off: Did the OKH really think that the US would enter the war in Europe? Megalomania and all, but could they really have been that dumb? Especially at a time where the eastern offensive had ground to a halt... (eh..it was the Germans that declared war on the US and not the other way around, right? :confused: )




TheZel66 -> (7/11/2001 3:45:00 AM)

more what ifs.... imagine if the French had actually taken a chance and played the 1940 invasion a little less cautious. They could have stomped the over matched Germans as quickly as the German did them in reality.. Or had the German forces committed Armor earlier in Normandy.... or.... That's the great thing about SPWAW, you can test the what if's until your power supply burns out...




Belisarius -> (7/11/2001 4:04:00 AM)

Oooh, so I'm not quite done yet... apparently. I feel not a little contempt for Jacques' opinions about who's got the best soldiers. All fought and died for the same things, and I respect them for it. It won't do them justice to sit here today and argue which was the best. Germans did have an advantage right after the invasion of being battle-hardened on the east front. But that was soon gained by the Allies as well...etc. Now I stray away again: Many of you have served, or are in service, in the US Army. If I'm not completely wrong, the Allies used a rotational system for soldiers during WWII, right? NN months, 50 sorties etc, and you're going home. The Germans did not, which allowed them to gain comparatively a lot of battlefield experience (and fatigue). From what I've understood, this was somewhat of a drawback in Vietnam - experienced troops were constantly rotated back home and replaced with greens. Especially tough in SE Asia with a different nature and where knowledge of the surroundings are even more essential. Sooo... what do you service people prefer: Rotation or staying at the theatre of operations until it's over? Wasn't the latter emplied in the Gulf War? 'scuse my wandering mind.. but it'd be kinda nice to get your two cents on the subject.




A_B -> (7/11/2001 4:08:00 AM)

quote:

IF you turn movement radius to "B" you get a 'darkened' backround with the moves lit up in lighter color - I think it switches in "night" games. That is teh best we can do in SP:WAW...
Paul, i'll do that, that'll help with graphics. I'm not bitching about SP. I think the preferences will handle night fighting ok. I would like to see a consensous on settings. For example, a clear night spotting is 50%, a rainy night spotting is 30%, hitting in the rain is 90%, hitting at night is 60%. I've been doing some testing, and have these types of rules in the campaign i'm working on (first four battles are done, if anyone wants to have a go - McArthurs Battles; US Army vs. Japs)




Greenlake -> (7/11/2001 4:39:00 AM)

Rotation is mute for the US now. Unless we get into a major, global war and have to start conscripting men. And if that were the case, sure it's a heck of alot better to not have a bunch of green soldiers, but then again if you were on the battlefield for a year you would want to come home, wouldn't ya? :rolleyes:




Jaques Rico -> (7/11/2001 4:48:00 AM)

@ Belisarius
quote:

Belisarius wrote: I feel not a little contempt for Jacques' opinions about who's got the best soldiers. All fought and died for the same things, and I respect them for it. It won't do them justice to sit here today and argue which was the best.
First at all, my point was not, which soldiers were the best, I merely stated that Americans often overrate their own troops. It is nice to see that some of them are able to look objective at this matter. But if you truely compare the aces on both sides there are some discrepancies. For example the best american fighter pilot has 48 kills, the best german 352. The 10 best german fighter pilots shot down 2588 allied machines. What do you think is the number for the 10 best american pilots? The best german tank commander Wittman destroyed 141 tanks and 132 antitank guns. I dont know offhand who was the best allied tank commander and if he was even american, but I doubt that he could match those numbers. Sorry for any misunderstandings JR




Tombstone -> (7/11/2001 5:09:00 AM)

I hope this thread gets closed soon. From it we should start one about night fighting, one for people who want to participate in the snowball fight, and one to discuss the use of historical data. Something to note: Late in the war Russia wasn't just about more men and material. Russia was able to accomplish operational goals that are respectable from any standpoint. At the end of 1943 the Russians knew better than any country on the planet how war on that scale should be waged. Although they appeared to be a steamroller that was unstoppable (and for the most part they were) they were also a very well organized machine capable of planning multiple consecutive operations. The Russians front was the real show of WW2, and the transformation the Soviet army had to undergo was very impressive. Hmm, that's another thread worth spawning off this not-so-worthy thread. Tomo




Wild Bill -> (7/11/2001 5:12:00 AM)

"About the later units of the "Volksturm" which consisted mainly of 14 to 18 year old youth, there isnt much to say, if people like AmmoSgt and Sven think, these untrained kids were the average german soldiers and then blame their ability to stand up and die heroically in a lost war, i can only wonder about a certain mental disfuncionality." (Quote from Jaques) Did you ever wonder why Germany was forced to use soldiers of 14-18 year of age. What happened to the other more well trained veterans? They must have gotten killed somewhere. As to the phrase "mental disfunctionality," I consider that out of place on this forum. Address the issues, Jaques, don't insult the contributors. Attack the issues, not people. The same can be said for all of us. Let's keep this civil, even if we disagree, or we'll just shut it down. Wild Bill [ July 10, 2001: Message edited by: Wild Bill ]




Nikademus -> (7/11/2001 5:15:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by Paul Vebber: IF you turn movement radius to "B" you get a 'darkened' backround with the moves lit up in lighter color - I think it switches in "night" games. That is teh best we can do in SP:WAW...
yeah, have been doing that. So thats as good as we can do eh? ah well, it was a thought. But given what you guys have done for the infantry combat system i'd gladly play a night battle in movement radius "A" :D




Wild Bill -> (7/11/2001 5:25:00 AM)

Thank you for answering my post, Jaques. I really don't know what else to say or if it is worth saying. But I'll add a few thoughts and then try to be quiet. A lot of time and words have been expended on this topic, much like the ammo you mention being used in reference to Desert Storm. ;) (lotta "duds") You have certainly livened things up around here. :eek: When, however, the guns are silent, and the smoke clears from this battlefield, I feel fairly certain that your point of view (to which you are fully entitled) will remain unchanged. Mine (which is not that of an army of Supermen, but armies with ordinary men of extraordinary courage - on all sides) will also remain unchanged. Whatever conclusion you choose, the fact is clear that the Axis powers lost the war. For whatever reason you attribute to that fact, it remains that it was a good thing. It was also terrible for the innocents of ALL, I repeat, ALL countries with more than 50 million in Europe, Asia, the Pacific and Russia who were caught up in the firestorm known as WW2. No country has supermen. They are in cartoons and comic books. All countries have heroes, men of courage, men ready to sacrifice, men willing to die for their fellow soldiers and their beliefs. I don't see how anyone could deny that fact. History confirms it through all the centuries of man's existence. A lively posting here, to say the least. Wild Bill




General Mayhem -> (7/11/2001 5:52:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by Jaques Rico: @ Belisarius First at all, my point was not, which soldiers were the best, I merely stated that Americans often overrate their own troops. It is nice to see that some of them are able to look objective at this matter. But if you truely compare the aces on both sides there are some discrepancies. For example the best american fighter pilot has 48 kills, the best german 352. The 10 best german fighter pilots shot down 2588 allied machines. What do you think is the number for the 10 best american pilots? The best german tank commander Wittman destroyed 141 tanks and 132 antitank guns. I dont know offhand who was the best allied tank commander and if he was even american, but I doubt that he could match those numbers. Sorry for any misunderstandings JR
Well, I think comparison is not fair. Germans were lot longer fighting in air than any other nation and they were also shooting down many years allied bombers. Germans also shot down lot of obsolete airplanes for example in Russian. I think best ratio what comes to downed planes per used plane propably has Finland. Or so I've understood. Which would make Finnish Air force most effective in Second World War, not Germany if we use numbers alone. What comes to tank, similar things apply there too. Germans also destroyed lot of obsolete tanks, like Russian B7's in great numbers. On the other hand, everybody who fought against Germans fough against atleast equal opponent what came to tanks and airplanes for a very long time. [ July 10, 2001: Message edited by: General Mayhem ]




RolandRahn_MatrixForum -> (7/11/2001 5:54:00 AM)

quote:

Originally posted by Jaques Rico: @ Belisarius But if you truely compare the aces on both sides there are some discrepancies. For example the best american fighter pilot has 48 kills, the best german 352. The 10 best german fighter pilots shot down 2588 allied machines. What do you think is the number for the 10 best american pilots? JR
Ahem. 1st: Both Japan and Germany used their aces on the front until they were killed or so exhausted that they had to take a rest (and be send back into action as soon as possible). The western allies used their aces more effectively by using them as instructors for new pilots. As a result, an allied ace flew fewer missons than an axis ace. 2nd: Hartman achieved his victories on the eastern front. Do you think that Stalins purges did not affect the performance of the soviet air force? Of the 352 victories credited to him, how many were superior planes like the P51? (According to my source 4 over Polesti and 2 over Bucharest) I do not deny that Hartmann was an excellent pilot. And *maybe* the top german aces were better pilots than the top allied aces - due to the fact that the few germans who survived had the opportunity to get more experience than the top allied aces. If you look at the average pilot, you will discover that the avrerage allied pilot received more training than the average axis pilot (except for a short period at the start of WWII). Kind regards, Roland




m10bob -> (7/11/2001 6:27:00 AM)

so i'm just sittin' there in the basement of the Hofbrauhaus having a damn good time since mr nixon said i'd "learned my lesson",and said i could go to germany dye-reckt from bien hoa,(where i felt like the only rabbit in a rabbit hunt)...so now,here i was with this honey on my big American arm,all suntanned and all,just sippin' my brau,when over comes this big(heavy)pink cheeked slathering,drooling drunken fool who sez "you-American?"..suspecting it was my larger than european muscular build,my height(noticeable even when sitting),or maybe my American haircut(sidewall Ranger cut),i went ahead and answered "ja,Americanishe"......my new friend sits across from me and breathing heavily and happily sez "yes'i know Americans well!!!in 1945,here in munich,i hatt PANZERFAUST,and i kill American TANKS!!!!YES!!!......the cretin was proud of his accomplishment and the thing is,past the desire to return to recently set aside "abilities"?,i felt sorry that this fool,in his 50's(on that day),was probably telling me about the ONLY thing he ever did for ANYBODY....just a waste of flesh.......he was so proud of what he had done all those years ago.....j.r....i'm not mad at ya....hell,you might be my brother!!!!see,my dad was there,and he got to meet a lot of fellas from the 3rd fallshirmerjager,2nd and 17th SS,352nd,ad infinitum,and he survived that war and as a single men,well,he had to date SOMEONE after the war..RIGHT?????so like i said,you might be my brother.....now,i can't call yuh anything "affectionate" like REMF,or anything,cuz even that would indicate you had been SOMEWHERE near a real battlefield,and i suspect you were a company clerk,or maybe supply,somewhere...i imagine yuh even soiled yer brithes at "the Graf" .....now this nice "FORUM is put together for a bunch of good people who share common interests in wargaming,or just like history..but it has no place for prejuidice..you can take it down the road.we don't need it....a lot of America IS GERMAN..in fact,it's the ONLY country in the world with people from EVERY country in the world.....(rent the movie "Stripes"..watch it..rewind...watch it again.....look for the hidden message)....now,"aus den weg,ashloch".




jappe -> (7/11/2001 6:51:00 AM)

Roland you wrote:
quote:

Hartman achieved his victories on the eastern front. Do you think that Stalins purges did not affect the performance of the soviet air force? Of the 352 victories credited to him, how many were superior planes like the P51? (According to my source 4 over Polesti and 2 over Bucharest) I do not deny that Hartmann was an excellent pilot. And *maybe* the top german aces were better pilots than the top allied aces - due to the fact that the few germans who survived had the opportunity to get more experience than the top allied aces. If you look at the average pilot, you will discover that the avrerage allied pilot received more training than the average axis pilot (except for a short period at the start of WWII).
Actually Soviet pilots were not that bad, at least after 1942. They had learned air war hard way. About planes. P51 was not superior plane compared to Soviet ones. The Migs, Yaks and Laggs (later models) were actually very good planes, this is a fact that usually gets ignored because there isn't much good info about Soviet planes in the west. Those few P51s that Hartmann shot down were actually "accidents" because Hartmann mainly fought at eastern front, but as the fighting moved more and more over Germany the Soviet and US planes got into same area. Actually there have been few incidents were Soviet planes attacked P51 because of misidentification and if I remember correctly also US planes have opened fire against Soviets. There have been many discussions about the best German pilot and mostly about Hartmann. What makes Hartmann so good then? Hartmann knew what fights to fight. He picked up planes from dives and never left to dogfight. So Hartmann probably was not the best pilot but he surely was a great tactician. German pilots fought whole war from start to end. That makes lot of missions, probability to get shot down also increases and of course probability to get killed. Hartmann was shot down several times, also Rudel (stuka pilot) was shot down several times, he has the most combat missions flown (over 2500). So those who could survive the hell of war were skilled pilots or just very lucky ones. This same by the way applies also to Finnish and Soviet pilots, they fought the whole war, no pretermined number of missions and then home, which allies had (actually I'm not sure was this true for British pilots). We have no way of knowing how many victories allied (western) pilots could have had if they had fought whole war and by comparing how skilled pilots were only looking at how many kills they achieved is not the truth. -Jappe




darroch -> (7/11/2001 7:06:00 AM)

I think Wild Bill's last post captured this pretty well. To Whom It May Concern: JR hit an emotional topic for me when he made the insulting reference to the WW2 tankers who ran from their first Tiger encounter - and by inference, insulted pretty much every soldier whoever served in the US Army. When I think of all the brave men he so casually smeared, it really got to me... I'm ashamed to realize that I fired back at JR with the same sort of "German stereotypes" approach he used to insult US soldiers. I'm sorry if I offended SPWAWers from Germany/Austria. I behaved as rudely as JR. JR, I sure hope you take your "anecdotes" elsewhere...they are very negative. I would much rather wade through the arcane details of how to model infantry use of lousy weather to cover attacks than read any more of your "anecdotes"... If you take the time to read the dedication in the front of the SPWAW manual, to people of all countries who fought and died in WW2, (By Wild Bill) maybe you'll realize that most of us here honor ALL of the soldiers who answered the call of duty and paid the ultimate price - no matter what country they fought for. Landser/GI/Tommy/Ivan/etc... weren't they all pretty much victims of the likes of Stalin and Hitler and Mussolini? What's the point in jeering at them now?




Easy8 -> (7/11/2001 7:35:00 AM)

Thank you for answering my post, Jaques. I really don't know what else to say or if it is worth saying. But I'll add a few thoughts and then try to be quiet. A lot of time and words have been expended on this topic, much like the ammo you mention being used in reference to Desert Storm. (lotta "duds") You have certainly livened things up around here. When, however, the guns are silent, and the smoke clears from this battlefield, I feel fairly certain that your point of view (to which you are fully entitled) will remain unchanged. Mine (which is not that of an army of Supermen, but armies with ordinary men of extraordinary courage - on all sides) will also remain unchanged. Whatever conclusion you choose, the fact is clear that the Axis powers lost the war. For whatever reason you attribute to that fact, it remains that it was a good thing. It was also terrible for the innocents of ALL, I repeat, ALL countries with more than 50 million in Europe, Asia, the Pacific and Russia who were caught up in the firestorm known as WW2. No country has supermen. They are in cartoons and comic books. All countries have heroes, men of courage, men ready to sacrifice, men willing to die for their fellow soldiers and their beliefs. I don't see how anyone could deny that fact. History confirms it through all the centuries of man's existence. A lively posting here, to say the least. Wild Bill WB, thanks for adding some well needed brevity to this thread. I could not have stated it better. EZ8




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
3.140625