RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence

RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition

Message

RangerJoe -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 4:43:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: castor troy quote: ORIGINAL: Ambassador quote: ORIGINAL: Q-Ball Why do we need a pilot in the plane? Once you lose the pilot that's a ton of weight you can work with Cylons is the way to go. Or maybe Skynet. Cylons looked quite heavy though. A couple of them looked real nice.[:'(]

tolsdorff -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 5:08:47 PM)
Here is a good resource from someone that knows a lot more about it than any of us : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eUDF6ICE0s

RangerJoe -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 5:13:48 PM)
That is about a roller coaster? I just watched a little of it and I can't understand why a person would want to give a murderer pleasure while he is killed. Better they fear what is coming and not enjoy it.

tolsdorff -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 5:24:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RangerJoe That is about a roller coaster? I just watched a little of it and I can't understand why a person would want to give a murderer pleasure while he is killed. Better they fear what is coming and not enjoy it. hahaha. just watched that as well. [:D][:D][:D] Somewhere on his channel there is the video where he, an actual F-35 pilot that flew the F-16 for 6 years, talks about the negative attention the F-35 is getting. Corrected the link, thank you

Rusty1961 -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 6:20:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Q-Ball Why do we need a pilot in the plane? Once you lose the pilot that's a ton of weight you can work with Easy answer: MIC makes a TON of more profit on manned planes which are obsolete than unmanned planes.

fcooke -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 7:07:17 PM)
61 - I am guessing you have not spent a lot of time with computer programs. They have bugs. We will see manned aircraft for the rest of our lifetimes because a human can react whereas code can only 'follow the code'. And the pilot plus gear is likely only around 300 lbs. I guess if you add in ejection seat and supporting systems it comes closer to 1000 lbs.

RangerJoe -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/12/2021 10:30:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rusty1961 quote: ORIGINAL: Q-Ball Why do we need a pilot in the plane? Once you lose the pilot that's a ton of weight you can work with Easy answer: MIC makes a TON of more profit on manned planes which are obsolete than unmanned planes. Who is MIC? Would you rather be flown in a plane with no pilot with unknown and possibly known bugs in the guidance system or a plane with a pilot? One of these supposedly safe driverless cars ran down a pedestrian even though the system detected the pedestrian and had more than enough time to stop. Hagel zum Harry!

Lokasenna -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/13/2021 5:43:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RangerJoe quote: ORIGINAL: Lokasenna I continue not to understand Rusty's rabid obsession with the F-35 being bad (allegedly). My understanding of it was... it was never going to replace the F-16? Like, they fill entirely different roles. The F-15 (or F-18) would be another matter, as air superiority craft. But I still think it's fairly obvious that this obsession is off point. I think that I understand. Anything that the US does is bad, anything that the opponents of the US does is good. Y'know, I think you might be onto something.

Lokasenna -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/13/2021 5:44:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RangerJoe quote: ORIGINAL: Rusty1961 quote: ORIGINAL: Q-Ball Why do we need a pilot in the plane? Once you lose the pilot that's a ton of weight you can work with Easy answer: MIC makes a TON of more profit on manned planes which are obsolete than unmanned planes. Who is MIC? Would you rather be flown in a plane with no pilot with unknown and possibly known bugs in the guidance system or a plane with a pilot? One of these supposedly safe driverless cars ran down a pedestrian even though the system detected the pedestrian and had more than enough time to stop. Hagel zum Harry! MIC is something-speak for Military Industrial Complex. Get with the cult lingo, man!

Rusty1961 -> RE: OT: F35 can't replace F16/F15 despite its raison d'existence (3/13/2021 5:51:12 PM)
Hagel zum Harry! [/quote] MIC is something-speak for Military Industrial Complex. Get with the cult lingo, man! [/quote] Gen. Eisenhower was a cultist? Wow...thanks for sharing and denigrating an American war hero.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.75