quote:

ORIGINAL: Hubert Cater

I had to double check this and it looks like the change that was made was to have the losses for units match the reinforcement costs, e.g. if your Strategic Bomber lost 3 strength points, the losses would now report as 52 MPPs as that is what it would cost to reinforce it back to 10.

Previously it would have been reported as having lost 30% of its original cost which would have worked out to 105 MPPs.

You spend 350 MPPs on a bomber, this is shown as spent.
You reinforce that bomber, this is also shown as spent.

Your losses could either be based on the original cost, or what it costs you to reinforce. I can see arguments for it being represented one way or the other.

For example, if we report the losses based on the original cost then what you spend without reinforcement will match. But your reinforcement spending does not match the calculated losses.

If on the other hand we report the losses based on the reinforcement costs, then what you spend to reinforce will match the reported losses. However, the reported losses will not match up with what was originally spent on the unit.

Apologies for not making a note of this in the VERSION NOTES text file for the last update.