RockinHarry -> RE: Offensive and Defensive Frontages (8/3/2004 8:51:50 PM)
|
Interesting topic, but I unfortunately do not have the time for real in depth discussion. [:(] Some time ago I purchased some original german infantry tactic manuals from WW2 and they are some highly interesting reads as you can think! [8D] (one is "Tactics within frame of a reinforced infantry battalion", publisher "Offene Worte" Berlin, 1940/41) some brief example: Normal frontage for an infantry platoon in defense was considered to be between 200 to 500m (4 to 10 hexes). That´s just a rule of thumb as it depends much upon combat situation, terrain, whether units are full strength or not and whether you hold back a squad in reserve. Also a company or battailon seldomly fights alone without its support troops, which are HMG´s, infantry guns, mortars and any available artillery (AT and/or offboard). So in a defensive deployment you need to consider these support troops as well and a pure "physical" covering of a given frontage neither is practical nor desired. In fact a usual (german) infantry defensive deployment covers a frontage with "fire", not just with troops. That means the unavoidable gaps are effectively covered with support weapons, which are little bit layed back most of the time, preferably in "keyholed" positions covering a certain part of the front. German doctrine also stresses AT defense to be most important when deploying for defense and defensive terrain is chosen accordingly. Everything else comes second. Unfortunately that does not work well in SPWAW, as terrain like forests, swamps and creeks are not really something of an AT obstacle in this game.:( (scenario makers can workaround though) Also german doctrine calls for local counterattacks if the main defensive line is penetrated. That usually means that even if a Cpy. or Btl. is at full strength, parts of it (~1/4 - 1/3) is held in reserve and is not directly available to man the frontline. Well..that´s just a very rough sum up as said and things are different for attack and meeting engagement battles as well, although similar considerations concerning terrain, support ect. need to be taken when it comes to applying frontages for certain formations.
|
|
|
|