PBEM newbie looking for opponent (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Opponents wanted



Message


KGV -> PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/25/2005 9:59:47 PM)

First time PBEM player (but long time player) looking for opponent to test my mettle against.

Can guarentee 1 turn per day, usually more sat




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/25/2005 10:04:58 PM)

hey KGV

King George V eh?[:'(]

ill play ya


whcih side would u like?

i prefer Allied/USN as im an allied fanboy if thats all right lolz[:'(][:D]




KGV -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 8:16:40 PM)

Yeah Don't mind playing the Japs, only problem is I've been "invited" up north for a long weekend by my fiencee's friend . If your still interested when I get back on Mon 6th (or is it 7th, mon anyway)then email me at my gmail account on my profile.




KGV -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 8:18:04 PM)

ok the email address isn't there , its steven.mcconway@gmail.com




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:08:29 PM)

rgr that KGV


still interested[:'(]

any prefs for a scenario?




KGV -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:13:52 PM)

I've only played the longer games to be honest, playing the IJN AI at the moment in one and just lost four carriers to a fleet of seven (count em ) CV's and two CVL's, so I'm kinda getting pissed off with it. If you can think of any reasonably balanced shorter games let me know




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:24:57 PM)

ouch

that SUX i imagine, tho its never happened to me

ive always been careful with my carriers lolz

reasonably balanced and shorter eh?


ill have a look




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:28:40 PM)

quite a few short ones [:'(]

1-4
6-8 or 12 maybe i think would be ideal

[image]local://upfiles/11274/Lj226402264.jpg[/image]




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:29:40 PM)

and coral sea is roughly equal

2 CVS ag 2 CV and one old CVL

tho ur CAGs would be superior in EXP lvls




KGV -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:31:13 PM)

I thought I was being, they had been pounding the crap out of guadalcanal and I assumed the lull meant they had pulled back to Truk to re arm. They appeared just off Gili Gili, I got the first attacks in, in fact they didn't even launch in the first phase, and i scored six bomb hits spread over five carriers. I think the AI put that many down the smoke stack of the Yorktown




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:35:40 PM)

ur fatigue lvl was prolly high, plus u had AC damaged no doubt

and ijn carrier pilots were GOOD

they werent that good after thewy started dyin tho, and the idiots didnt rotate experienced pilots back to japan to train new pilots like we did, so we killed all the experienced pilots, and they just couldnt replace em

and how was ur fuel level and CAP?

alot of things can contribute to the death of a carrier, or carriers in ur case[X(]




KGV -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:44:37 PM)

My task force had been laid up in cairns or cooktown waiting for a week long thunder storm to pass, my bomber pilots were all fat 0, moral 80+. The thing that killed me was all three waves ran into 80-100 zeros flying CAP. That and the 200+ Vals and Kates they sent back at me. Only one of my carriers didn't go down instantly.

At least I still have my Wirraway's [sm=nono.gif]




marky -> RE: PBEM newbie looking for opponent (1/26/2005 9:54:03 PM)

lolz

another of the many things that can kill a carrier?

bad luck[:'(]

tho i woulda left em in noumea so theyd be a bit safer

ur fighters were at 0 FAT too right?

the Kido Butai is usually LETHAL at 0 FAT

my guess is that the carriers that got urs wrere at 0 FAT too

thats a biig part of why we call it...

THE DEATH STAR

[:'(]




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.15625