RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames



Message


Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/28/2006 10:55:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: max2
Hello Everyone,

I started playing WIF with one of my highschool friends about 20 years ago and my love for that game has not abated. I know you've all heard it before but I am giddy with excitement over the prospect of having this wonderful game available on the PC. To satsify my wargamer cravings I have played TOAW 2 and considered buying 3 but I held off since I saw the computer version of WIF was moving along. After all, TOAW is a great game but it's not WIF. I long for the days of fighting on all fronts!

My wishlist for the game would be as follows:

1) Make the game playable on a P4 1.4ghz machine with 768 RAM running XP Pro (yea that's my rig).

2) Make the AI a worthy opponent so that playing solo is a viable option, I beg you! As an aside, a couple of years back I found some guys nearby me that played WIF and I trekked out to see them on their gaming day. I arrived to find that they decided not to play that day but didn't bother to let me know. So I get there all ready to dig in and they're relaxing drinking wine. Besides not offering me a glass of wine, they were about as friendly as a sharp stick in the eye. Save me (and others) from having to deal with rude geeks to play this game and create a beefy AI!

3) Eventually include Days of Decision somehow. I know that’s a tall order and I certainly don't expect it on the first release.

Lastly, I gladly offer my services to aid in development. I am not a programmer, only player of many years and I'm even a bit rusty at that. But I do have a keen eye for detail and troubleshooting and I am WW2 trivia buff. What I have been reading, it seems you have more than enough volunteers in the trenches at the moment but if not, draft me!

Thanks to you all for the hardwork and I can't wait till this is done,

Max

Welcome.

If you would like to help with writing descriptions for the land units, Capitan is coordinating those efforts, and he is looking for help. See the thread on Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land.

And please feel free to state your opinions on what you read in the forums. This game is so large with so many possibilities that no one has complete knowledge, and the more voices the better.

You should read the Directory thread if you haven't already, to get a quick overview of what the forum contains.

And you might enjoy the thread on the tutorials, since they contain a lot of screen shots (though all are draft screen shots and some are out of date).




max2 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/28/2006 11:16:58 PM)

Steve,

The screenshots are tasty indeed and they have only wet my appetite to play.  Is it safe to assume that there isn't any need for beta testers at this time?

Max




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/29/2006 12:13:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: max2

Steve,

The screenshots are tasty indeed and they have only wet my appetite to play.  Is it safe to assume that there isn't any need for beta testers at this time?

Max

Greyshaft is maintaining a list of want-to-be beta testers, so send him an email.

I talked to David Heath a couple of weeks ago and he said that at some point we should increase the number of beta testers. Currently there are 20, and expect to go to 40. That won't happen for a while yet (months?) but the people who do good work go to the top of the list.




max2 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/29/2006 12:40:46 AM)

I went to the member list and found Grayshaft but when I tried to email him it said that I didn't have enough permission to do this.  I then tried to send him a PM but it said that he had this feature disabled.  Any suggestions?




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/29/2006 1:54:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: max2

I went to the member list and found Grayshaft but when I tried to email him it said that I didn't have enough permission to do this.  I then tried to send him a PM but it said that he had this feature disabled.  Any suggestions?

Graham Dodge greyshaft@hotmail.com




mlees -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/29/2006 6:03:28 PM)

I was curious about the current beta testing at the moment:

Are the testers actually playing full game turns, or just testing various buttons and links on the GUI?

I was hankerin' for AAR's... but I imagine some NDA's would might inhibit AAR's from being written at this time.

I was also thinking that you can have AAR's in the release that have links to various parts of your tutorial chapters... with notes by the player(s) on what they might have been thinking at the time they made certain decisions. (Maybe not the full Global War scenario... that's a monster.)

Example: "I decided on this turns builds because I need to prepare for my Operation Blueberry, my eventual return to North Africa.... and I'm weak on Amph's and Transports at this time. Also, I wanted to keep my Air unit gearing limits up around "x", so I threw in a couple of my cheapest CV planes even though I didn't have the flattops to put them on at the moment."




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/29/2006 6:43:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mlees
I was curious about the current beta testing at the moment:

Are the testers actually playing full game turns, or just testing various buttons and links on the GUI?

I was hankerin' for AAR's... but I imagine some NDA's would might inhibit AAR's from being written at this time.

I was also thinking that you can have AAR's in the release that have links to various parts of your tutorial chapters... with notes by the player(s) on what they might have been thinking at the time they made certain decisions. (Maybe not the full Global War scenario... that's a monster.)

Example: "I decided on this turns builds because I need to prepare for my Operation Blueberry, my eventual return to North Africa.... and I'm weak on Amph's and Transports at this time. Also, I wanted to keep my Air unit gearing limits up around "x", so I threw in a couple of my cheapest CV planes even though I didn't have the flattops to put them on at the moment."


The Non-Disclosure Agreement prevents the beta testers from commenting on the game in development.

I continually 'break' the game when I add new features. As an example, for a period of about a week this past month I was having trouble getting a clean compile and link. At times simply compiling the program would cause my system to crash (I would have to reboot to get the compiler working again). Though frustrating, this is all standard stuff for program development where small changes can have disasterous results, from a user's/player's point of view. To some degree, this is a lot like building an airplane, where a missing nut can make the plane unflightworthy.




mlees -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (11/29/2006 6:45:13 PM)

Ok. Thanks for the info.




trees -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/1/2006 4:59:28 AM)

but the playtesters are _playing_, right, so like Warsaw has been taken at least once or twice???




wworld7 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/1/2006 6:25:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: trees

but the playtesters are _playing_, right, so like Warsaw has been taken at least once or twice???


Rumor has it the team is still working on taking Luxembourg...

Flipper




YohanTM2 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/1/2006 8:10:07 PM)

The intial panzers were a bit underarmed so those Lux farmers can get at them[:D]




Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 1:00:36 AM)

I had trouble logging into Matrix this morning or I would have posted this earlier.
------------------------------------------------------
December 1, 2006 Status Report for Matrix Games’ MWIF Forum

Accomplishments of November

Project Management
I did my first detailed project plan in mid-October and have more or less kept on track against that to date. However, my estimation of my time required to complete MWIF product 1 is over 3300 hours. Roughly, the big items are coding/modifying: Player Interface and the AI Opponent (~800 hours each), Game Engine and Rules (~400 hours each), and the Tutorials, PBEM, and Documentation (200 - 300 hours range for each). These are broken down into finer detail, with everything rounded off to units of 10 hours.

Altogether, I have 70 items on the project plan spreadsheet with what gets worked on when scheduled by month. This is only one of 5 task lists I maintain. The others are: reported bugs from versions 2 and 3, programming to-do list, and project tasks. The last deals with the project overall and includes people other than myself, while the other 3 are specific to programming. The programming to-do list priorities the bugs to be fixed and interleaves new items (e.g., new optional rules).

At this point I am the bottleneck in the project schedule, but there doesn’t seem to be much more I can do about that. I delegate tasks whenever possible and then step aside, taking care to not micro-manage items I have given to others. Of course, this still requires staying informed of how things are going and providing assistance whenever it’s needed. Still, management, and all that implies, places few demands on my time. I figure it is only 10 - 15 %, and I include in that all the report writing and communications to forum members and other members of the MWIF project team: email, posts, status reports, plus a few rare phone calls.

I calculate I have spent around 5000 hours on MWIF since I started in July 2005. Someone in the forum wasn’t sure whether I was working full time on MWIF. Well, I am using 9 productive hours a day as my metric for scheduling tasks, with no days off. By productive, I mean after the 10 -15% for management has been accounted for. In reality I work 10-12 hours a day on MWIF. That lets me fit in some barbershop singing, but otherwise I am a recluse: me and MWIF. My wife keeps me fed and points out lapses in personal hygiene.

This works out to me completing my tasks in December 2007. David Heath translates that to a release at Origins in July 2008.

Why so much longer than originally thought? Mostly it is a lack of documentation. The programming tools I am using explore all the possible ways to do poor documentation: none, incomplete, misleading, obsolete, written by a non-English speaker (Theme Engine - Russian), and, most common, frequent use of words with special meanings that are never defined. For example, every so often, while I am entering text comments into the source code, the compiler crashes with the error message: “Target of an invocation failed.” Reboot and start again. I also lost 4 days last week before I figured out that adding a directory to the search path for the compiler was resulting in it ‘automatically’ recompiling all the Theme Engine modules - incorrectly. I removed the directory from the search path and dozens of problems disappeared.

When I write new code, programming is easy. When I need to go into the CWIF code and make changes, extreme care is required or things can go wrong without me knowing. Tracing the repercussions of changes, especially when it involves the Windows User Interface routines is time consuming. Failure to understand exactly what is going on is even worse and can lead to a great loss of time later spent finding and fixing bugs.

You now know most of what I know about the MWIF project schedule.

Communications
Rob Armstrong provided new coastal and river/lake bitmaps for about 2/3rds of Russia, the Caucasus, Mid-East, India, Burma, China, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand, and the Solomon and Caroline Islands.

I monitored all the threads in the MWIF World in Flames forum daily.

Work on the unit writeups continues, with a few new volunteers.

Chris Marinacci sent me some bug corrections he has made to the version of CWIF being sold by ADG. I hope to be able to reciprocate from time to time.

Beta testers sent me numerous reports on the versions 3.02, 3.03, 3.04, 3.05, and 3.06 I uploaded for them during the month.

No activity with the AI Opponent team, though the forum members are helping with the strategic plan for France.

No word from Patrice and Peter Kanjowski about their project on the Yahoo WIF Discussion group to clarify all outstanding rules questions.

Dan Hatchen (I hope) is waiting on me to install what he has already done on NetPlay.

Beta Testing
I have been able to fix a dozen or so bugs identified by the beta testers but there are still major difficulties, even playing Barbarossa. More on my attempts to iron out the fatal crashes below.

Units
Other than some new unit writeups, there has been no new work on the units. The code and data are pretty stable at this point.

Map
I processed all the coastal and river/lake bitmaps that Rob sent me (see the list given above) and incorporated them into the current version of MWIF. Patrice took those images and made corrections to the map data they revealed. He also has been going gang-busters on adding new names/labels to the map. Once the detailed coastlines, rivers, and lakes have been drawn a lot of touch-up work is needed. Part of that is to place the map icons in reasonable places (keep the factories out of the ocean), reroute the rail lines through each hex so they do not cross water, and place the names/labels so they are both legible and do not cover important game elements.

Somewhere in the middle of the month I provided both Rob and Patrice with the utility program I use to cut Rob’s large coastal bitmaps into individual hexes and generate the river/lake quasi-bitmaps. I included documentation on how to run the program. Patrice now runs it so he can edit the map data files without waiting on me to process them.

The coastal bitmaps are 50% complete and the river/lake bitmaps are 55% complete.

Scenario Information
I learned that the version of the WIF FE unit setup information I had been using was obsolete. I now have the correct one and I will ask the beta testers to proofread the scenario setup code to identify needed changes. Most of the mods have to do with Cruisers in Flames and Convoys in Flames.

CWIF Conversion
Problems popped up with the pop-up unit menu. Since I wanted to do it anyway, I restructured this earlier than I had planned. The routines that process the unit menu items are now in a separate module and the main program module is down to a svelte 11,200 lines of code. Unit menu items are: split/merge convoys, breakdown/reform units, place units in sentry mode, and dozens of others.

I began work on a new system to route resources to factories. This is needed by the AIO but it will also help players route resources and save oil points. The design is 95% done and I will use a similar one for determining supply for units. Basically calculating supply status for units is the same routing problem but with different rules.

Game Interface
Most of my time this month has been spent working on bugs in the player interface identified by the beta testers. While working on that I kept coming across anomalous events, some of which were “now it’s a problem, now it isn’t”. Eventually I began to suspect that the software libraries were out of sync so I went back to bedrock. I uninstalled all the software libraries I was using, including the Delphi compiler itself. I then reinstalled everything from scratch. As is usual in performing this task, it required several days full of profanity and detailed discussion on the ancestry of the people who design, code, and document software packages.

This did result in identifying some systemic problems which I was able to correct without too much trouble. More importantly, I am no longer worrying about the code base with which I am working - or at least not as much.

Internet - NetPlay
I made some progress on this but had to stop work in order to debug versions 3.0x.

MWIF Game Engine
I also made good progress in writing events out to the game record log. This was much easier than I expected and should be completed quickly once the rest of the game engine redesign is complete.

Saved Games
I haven’t tested this recently. I have no bugs listed for this code at the present.

Player’s Manual
Nothing new.

Help System, Tutorials, and AI Assistant
I did a little more work on the Introductory Tutorials but I need Rob to redo the Weather bitmap overlays. I also need to get the code that determines supply corrected.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Started detailed work on the strategic plan for France.

Other
Our Xmas show is coming up next week. We have been practicing a lot plus we have several other paid gigs scheduled. During the holidays we get to perform at parties which helps the chapter treasury. I have also found a new baritone for our quartet. We lost our previous baritone when he went off to college in western Massachusetts in August.
====================================================================
November summary: Good progress on the bitmap graphics for the map. Too little on fixing bugs and NetPlay.
====================================================================


Tasks for December

Communications
Continue monitoring the forum threads.

Beta Testing
Fix more bugs, so that version 3.00 can play through the entire Barbarossa scenario cleanly. [est. 60 hours]

Map and Units
Continue adding coastal and river/lake bitmaps as I receive them from Rob. [est. 20 hours]

CWIF Conversion
Thoroughly test the new random number generator. [est. 1 hour]

Game Interface
Get the bidding capability to function cleanly and modify other aspects of the Player Interface to support NetPlay. [est. 20 hours]

Redesign of MWIF Game Engine
Continue refining the superstructure of the MWIF game engine. [est. 45 hours]

Software Development Tools
Finish replacing all the old components with new ones from JEDI (as part of the debugging process for 3.00). [est. 10 hours]

NetPlay
Incorporate the Indy10 code for the new design for the multiplayer system into MWIF. [est. 100 hours]

AI Opponent
Finish the Strategic plan for France and begin work on the same for China and Italy. [est. 15 hours].

Player’s Manual
Nothing planned for December.

Historical Detail, Animations, and Sound
Nothing planned for December.

Help System, Tutorials, and AI Assistant
Continue work on the Introductory Tutorials. [est. 10 hours]

Other
Perform in the Xmas show - as one of the anonymous reindeer/basses in the back row. Start work on the script for the Spring show.
================================================================
December summary: Debug version 3.00. Continue mass production of the coastal and river/lake bitmaps. Implement NetPlay.
================================================================







trees -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 1:14:15 AM)

plus I hope you get to go skiing or something else fun away from a computer for Christmas. Thanks Steve!




Greyshaft -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 5:01:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: max2

I went to the member list and found Grayshaft but when I tried to email him it said that I didn't have enough permission to do this. I then tried to send him a PM but it said that he had this feature disabled. Any suggestions?

Not sure why... I've been receiving PM and email communications from Matrix forum members for many years now. There's no spam filter, abuse filter or naughty-word filter in operation so I get to read everything people send me.

Beta testing lists aren't open at the moment. I had (still have) a list of about forty names of people who want to get into the team but I doubt we'll be taking on anyone else this side of Christmas. I'm leaning towards the idea of restarting the list every time we make a call for new testers so we get those who are keen and involved with the Forums rather than someone who put their name on a list six months ago and hasn't been heard of since.

That's the offical story. In reality what happens is that every now and then the inner cabal have a secret meeting and after the ritual sacrifice of a WiF Rulebook in the lighting of the barbeque we enter the names of applicants into the WiF compiler and whichever name makes the best seed for the random number generator is accepted as a new beta-tester. So if you want to maximise your chances then make sure that your name is exactly fifteen letters including 'z', 'q', uppercase 'K' and no vowels.





Frederyck -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 9:34:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greyshaft

So if you want to maximise your chances then make sure that your name is exactly fifteen letters including 'z', 'q', uppercase 'K' and no vowels.



So true. That's how I ended up on the team. (Along with a "donation" in small unmarked bills to all involved).

/Frederyck aka Khrrlh-Nhcqhlzc




Portal -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 6:27:53 PM)

Sorry, everyone. I was hoping Matrix WiF would be my entry point into the WiF world but I no longer have faith in this project.

This timeline revision to a July 2008 release is the third significant release date revision this year. Over the next 18 months, there's no reason to believe release won't be pushed back even further.

As much as I respect the work Steve is doing, and trying to do, I now believe too much is being bitten off for this first release. Earlier posters emphasized the development time risk associated with AI opponent programming, and I now concur with their beliefs. Focusing on multi-player online live play (a la VASSAL), and setting AI aside, would help get product into players' hands within a reasonable time frame. A computer AI opponent could then be added in an upgrade patch or expansion pack. I believe most players are interested in MWiF for online multi-player play, with an AI opponent being a secondary consideration.

It seems this project needs more development resources, and most particularly, a project manager with deeper scheduling experience. Good luck to Matrix and this development team and hopefully this project will come to fruition eventually.




Froonp -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 7:03:35 PM)

quote:

Sorry, everyone. I was hoping Matrix WiF would be my entry point into the WiF world but I no longer have faith in this project.

This timeline revision to a July 2008 release is the third significant release date revision this year. Over the next 18 months, there's no reason to believe release won't be pushed back even further.

And for me, this is the most realistic of any date ever announced.

There are reasons to believe that this release date won't be eternaly being pushed back, and I prefer being announced a realistic release date, even far away, that any other pleasant, but unrealistic release date.




wworld7 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 11:08:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Portal

Sorry, everyone. I was hoping Matrix WiF would be my entry point into the WiF world but I no longer have faith in this project.

I believe most players are interested in MWiF for online multi-player play, with an AI opponent being a secondary consideration.


If I was a betting man I would say you were WRONG!

Oh okay, I'll bet a US dollar.

Flipper




Portal -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/2/2006 11:27:46 PM)

Flipper,

I'm willing to call you on your comments, and bet you a fair amount more than 1 U.S. dollar. [8D][:'(]




Zorachus99 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 12:35:47 AM)

Mid 2008 :(




Rexor -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 12:42:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Portal

Sorry, everyone. I was hoping Matrix WiF would be my entry point into the WiF world but I no longer have faith in this project.

This timeline revision to a July 2008 release is the third significant release date revision this year. Over the next 18 months, there's no reason to believe release won't be pushed back even further.

As much as I respect the work Steve is doing, and trying to do, I now believe too much is being bitten off for this first release. Earlier posters emphasized the development time risk associated with AI opponent programming, and I now concur with their beliefs. Focusing on multi-player online live play (a la VASSAL), and setting AI aside, would help get product into players' hands within a reasonable time frame. A computer AI opponent could then be added in an upgrade patch or expansion pack. I believe most players are interested in MWiF for online multi-player play, with an AI opponent being a secondary consideration.

It seems this project needs more development resources, and most particularly, a project manager with deeper scheduling experience. Good luck to Matrix and this development team and hopefully this project will come to fruition eventually.


I appreciate your pain, but I must heartily disagree. The trend in computer wargaming against the inclusion of a challenging A.I. is alarming to me. It's as if the whole industry has simply given up on the issue. In Steve we have a dedicated A.I. expert who is willing to prove the nay-sayers wrong, and I, for one, am excited at the prospect. Moreover, I have seen way, way too many games released before they should have been. (I'm sure most posters will agree with me here.) Taking more time to get it right is fine with me.




wfzimmerman -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 12:51:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

I had trouble logging into Matrix this morning or I would have posted this earlier.
------------------------------------------------------
December 1, 2006 Status Report for Matrix Games’ MWIF Forum

Accomplishments of November

Project Management
I did my first detailed project plan in mid-October and have more or less kept on track against that to date. However, my estimation of my time required to complete MWIF product 1 is over 3300 hours. Roughly, the big items are coding/modifying: Player Interface and the AI Opponent (~800 hours each), Game Engine and Rules (~400 hours each), and the Tutorials, PBEM, and Documentation (200 - 300 hours range for each). These are broken down into finer detail, with everything rounded off to units of 10 hours.
...

This works out to me completing my tasks in December 2007. David Heath translates that to a release at Origins in July 2008.


Instead of whingeing about "July 2008", everyone who reads this should be saying to themselves, "yay, we have a project manager who knows how to plan a realistic schedule!"




Zorachus99 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 12:57:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rexor


quote:

ORIGINAL: Portal

Sorry, everyone. I was hoping Matrix WiF would be my entry point into the WiF world but I no longer have faith in this project.

This timeline revision to a July 2008 release is the third significant release date revision this year. Over the next 18 months, there's no reason to believe release won't be pushed back even further.

As much as I respect the work Steve is doing, and trying to do, I now believe too much is being bitten off for this first release. Earlier posters emphasized the development time risk associated with AI opponent programming, and I now concur with their beliefs. Focusing on multi-player online live play (a la VASSAL), and setting AI aside, would help get product into players' hands within a reasonable time frame. A computer AI opponent could then be added in an upgrade patch or expansion pack. I believe most players are interested in MWiF for online multi-player play, with an AI opponent being a secondary consideration.

It seems this project needs more development resources, and most particularly, a project manager with deeper scheduling experience. Good luck to Matrix and this development team and hopefully this project will come to fruition eventually.


I appreciate your pain, but I must heartily disagree. The trend in computer wargaming against the inclusion of a challenging A.I. is alarming to me. It's as if the whole industry has simply given up on the issue. In Steve we have a dedicated A.I. expert who is willing to prove the nay-sayers wrong, and I, for one, am excited at the prospect. Moreover, I have seen way, way too many games released before they should have been. (I'm sure most posters will agree with me here.) Taking more time to get it right is fine with me.


Honestly here my take.

The board game had no AI. Steve signed on to do the AI. [sm=duel.gif]

Shipping a product without AI is alarming from the traditional producers perspective.

However I'm sure you'd be surprized how many people would buy the product Pre-AI at a premium price. Driving perhaps hundreds of miles to play a game that takes 8 hours for a good session is a draining experience. Netplay of the same game at your convienience is a blessed luxury. Delay of the game for an AI is honestly frustrating. How many of us have been waiting more than 10 years for a game that simply functioned online?

Please consider making the AI a plug-in, delayed feature or whatever you might call it. None of us are getting younger, a few of us aren't even in great health. I'd like to play before (god forbid) I or my mates lost the chance. How about a voucher for the AI?

*shrug* never hurts to try even if it feels like your pleadings will be pushed aside by business concerns.




Mziln -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 1:51:02 AM)

[sm=00000023.gif] The 5 groups of contention within MWiF: [sm=00000023.gif] 

(1) I must have AI.
(2) I must have Play by Email (PBEM).
(3) I must have all the above.
(4) I don't care about AI.
(5) I don't care about PBEM.


Groups 1 and 2 are understandingly very vocal. That is why so many threads are devoted to them in this forum.

Just because we don't read much from Group 2, don't even think the PBEM people aren’t reading these posts! 


Link to why MWiF must have AI and PBEM.




wworld7 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 3:03:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mziln

[sm=00000023.gif] The 5 groups of contention within MWiF: [sm=00000023.gif] 

(1) I must have AI.
(2) I must have Play by Email (PBEM).
(3) I must have all the above.
(4) I don't care about AI.
(5) I don't care about PBEM.


Groups 1 and 2 are understandingly very vocal. That is why so many threads are devoted to them in this forum.

Just because we don't read much from Group 2, don't even think the PBEM people aren’t reading these posts! 


Link to why MWiF must have AI and PBEM.


I agree with the above and I am a member of Group 3. After over twenty years working with and for software companies I predict Group 2 will become more more vocal once it is released and they can comment better.

Flipper




wworld7 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 3:03:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Portal

Flipper,

I'm willing to call you on your comments, and bet you a fair amount more than 1 U.S. dollar. [8D][:'(]


A dollar is fine




Arron69 -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 10:17:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mziln

[sm=00000023.gif] The 5 groups of contention within MWiF: [sm=00000023.gif]

(1) I must have AI.
(2) I must have Play by Email (PBEM).
(3) I must have all the above.
(4) I don't care about AI.
(5) I don't care about PBEM.


Groups 1 and 2 are understandingly very vocal. That is why so many threads are devoted to them in this forum.

Just because we don't read much from Group 2, don't even think the PBEM people aren’t reading these posts!


Link to why MWiF must have AI and PBEM.


I must say that the reasoning here is VERY bad. Just becourse we dont hear from you we sould not forget that you are there. Hey vice versa. The only reason the threads are in the forum, is to help Steve with the AI; to help speed up the project; to help YOU. And all you whiners, listen here, you say you have been waiting 10 years, then whats 1 and a half more then...? Quit whining, the game will not come out sooner becourse of that, pitch in instead. Do some write-ups, and help speed-up the production.

And on the betting front, im on flipperwasirish´s side. Im in for a $.

Andi




wosung -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 11:29:46 AM)

Won't buy it without AI. Never played PBEM nor online before. Think esp. playing MWIF PBEM with all it's subphases might be too tedious for me. But like to read AARs.

Regards




Portal -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 6:45:58 PM)

Well, in my case, I'm definitely not one of those who've been waiting almost foolhardily it seems for 10 years for the release of this game. My interest in WiF came to be over the last 12 months as I'm looking to expand the scale of my WWII wargaming interests beyond the tactical (ASL) and operational (Gamers OCS) levels.

I leave monster games and scenarios out on my FtF basement gaming table plenty as it is, so I was hoping to enter the WiF world through a great PC game. The wargamers I know have little interest in computer AIs, as gaming against a machine offers none of the social interaction we like when we play games.

VASL / VASSAL in conjunction with Skype have been fantastic tools for us to get together to play games live. It helps us manage schedules and continue mutiple large games and scenarios at once. We would be looking to play MWiF for its live online features because we enjoy this experience most. As it looks like right now, I'll just switch over to a copy of the Final Edition (Classic) board game and try to get the most out of the VASSAL WiF module.

Frankly, I'm surprised by the players who would rather an AI opponent than live online play. On the Internet, it's straightforward to find human opponents and a much more rewarding experience to play. Last time I checked, computer AIs still don't have a great sense of humour. :)




SamuraiProgrmmr -> RE: Old WIF Player Saying Hello and Thanks (12/3/2006 7:04:32 PM)

How many more good opponents will there be if they have an AI to help them learn the rules?

At the very least, an AI opponent will help new WIF players get up to speed. At the very best, it will provide a useful way to hone one's skills and try out strategies.





Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.391113