RE: convoy intercepted

RE: convoy intercepted (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports

Message

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/12/2006 11:24:23 AM)
as expected today more ships were sunk 5 in naval and 7 in air phase i see 4 transports remaining so next turn enemy will be eliminated AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 03/04/43 Night Time Surface Combat at 79,101 Japanese Ships BB Haruna /Haruna has experience from such night hunting from 42 CA Tone DD Tanikaze Allied Ships AK Crater, on fire AK Carina, on fire, heavy damage AK Cassiopeia, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk AK Mintaka, on fire, heavy damage AK Sterope, Shell hits 9, on fire, heavy damage AK George Vancouver, on fire, heavy damage AK James Schureman, Shell hits 11, and is sunk AK Juan Cabrillo, Shell hits 8, and is sunk AK Peter H. Burnett, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk AK William E. Channing, Shell hits 6, on fire, heavy damage AK William P. McArthur, and is sunk Naval bombardment of Tenimbar, at 36,81 Allied aircraft no flights Allied aircraft losses P-40E Warhawk: 2 destroyed Japanese Ships DD Yunagi DD Asanagi DD Matsukaze DD Yuzuki DD Mikazuki DD Fumizuki DD Yugiri DD Hatsuyuki DD Isonami DD Shirakumo DD Shinonome DD Hamakaze CL Yubari CL Tama CL Nagara CA Kako CA Furutaka CA Kinugasa CA Aoba Allied ground losses: 321 casualties reported Vehicles lost 2 Runway hits 8 Port hits 1 Port supply hits 3 Day Air attack on TF at 80,101 Japanese aircraft A6M3a Zero x 6 B5N Kate x 12 E13A1 Jake x 12 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Carina, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage AK William E. Channing, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage AK Crater, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage Aircraft Attacking: 4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet 4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 80,101 Japanese aircraft B5N Kate x 5 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Mintaka, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage AK Sterope, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage Aircraft Attacking: 1 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 83,101 Japanese aircraft D3A Val x 27 A6M3a Zero x 24 B5N Kate x 13 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Cetus, Bomb hits 16, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage Allied ground losses: 51 casualties reported Aircraft Attacking: 9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet 1 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet 9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 83,102 Japanese aircraft B5N Kate x 30 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Celeno, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage Allied ground losses: 44 casualties reported Aircraft Attacking: 2 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 83,102 Japanese aircraft A6M5 Zeke x 27 D4Y Judy x 26 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Draco, Bomb hits 10, on fire, heavy damage Allied ground losses: 51 casualties reported Aircraft Attacking: 3 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 2 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet 4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet 4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet 4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet 4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet 4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet 4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet 4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 82,102 Japanese aircraft B6N Jill x 16 Japanese aircraft losses B6N Jill: 1 damaged Allied Ships AK William M. Stewart, Torpedo hits 3, on fire, heavy damage Aircraft Attacking: 4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 83,102 Japanese aircraft A6M3a Zero x 6 E13A1 Jake x 11 Japanese aircraft losses E13A1 Jake: 1 damaged Allied Ships AK William C. Claiborne Aircraft Attacking: 3 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet 4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet 4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 83,101 Japanese aircraft D3A Val x 27 A6M3a Zero x 24 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Eridanus, Bomb hits 5, on fire, heavy damage Allied ground losses: 58 casualties reported Aircraft Attacking: 9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet 9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet 9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 83,101 Japanese aircraft B5N Kate x 13 No Japanese losses Allied Ships AK Albireo, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage Allied ground losses: 44 casualties reported Aircraft Attacking: 1 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 82,102 Japanese aircraft B5N Kate x 15 Japanese aircraft losses B5N Kate: 1 destroyed Allied Ships AK George Read, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage Allied ground losses: 58 casualties reported Aircraft Attacking: 2 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/12/2006 2:25:00 PM)
03/05/43 enemy convoy finished today 4 next transports sunk (24 total ) I assume I will see 2 usmc para no more :-)

Raverdave -> RE: boring turn (6/12/2006 3:05:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: veji1 waow, Id like to now how fatigued they were and what was the range they were flying from... Because shooting that many P38 doesn't happen very often.. The pilot exp is only 58 for this group....they are but babes still suckling from their mother.

veji1 -> RE: boring turn (6/12/2006 3:06:34 PM)
hmm than result is pretty logical really...

Sneer -> RE: boring turn (6/12/2006 3:07:48 PM)
for me too

Raverdave -> RE: boring turn (6/12/2006 3:11:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ADavidB quote: And once again KB action is successful I thought at first it is an invasion - but it is even better enemy convoy intercetped between santa cruz and nanomuea atoll I counted 22 AKs ( 8 sunk this turn , at least 7 next are heavy damaged and only 2 unscratched ) I'm astounded that Raver sent unprotected transports in Harm's Way like that. The way things are going, you'll run out of naval targets in another game-month or so... [X(] Dave Baranyi I have well over 80+ TFs running around all over the place and this wee little TF got missed on my usual scan and so sailed into harms way[8\|] Human error only. They had a battalion of marines onboard and a ****e load of supplies.

Raverdave -> RE: boring turn (6/12/2006 3:14:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ADavidB quote: ORIGINAL: veji1 waow, Id like to now how fatigued they were and what was the range they were flying from... Because shooting that many P38 doesn't happen very often.. P-38s in WitP are kitty cats. In UV they were pure Death-In-The-Skies, but somewhere along the way things were changed... Every WitP Allied player does the same thing with P-38s the first time. It comes from frustration from playing nearly 360 turns without being able to stand up to Japanese fighters... [;)] Dave Baranyi (The idiotic Forum S/W "starred out" pussy when I first wrote it instead of "kitty". [8\|]) If you can get P-38 Squadrons to live long enough and make an exp level of 70 then you have a chance of doing some damage.........other wise they are just fodder for the Jap pilots.

Sneer -> enemy activity (6/13/2006 3:45:39 PM)
glen spotted CA and BB north of Perth activity in Darwin area rises on daily basis

Ron Saueracker -> RE: enemy activity (6/13/2006 4:38:48 PM)
I don't think Raverdave is really trying.

Sneer -> RE: enemy activity (6/13/2006 5:22:26 PM)
who knows if there is no serious operation it can be raid on palembang or sth like that or fleet transfer to india to cover operation on this theater

Sneer -> RE: enemy activity (6/13/2006 6:57:25 PM)
3/10/43 USS Barb heavily damaged by my hunter killer group at bataan Isl she is far from home so maybe it will be a kill

ADavidB -> RE: enemy activity (6/14/2006 12:09:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker I don't think Raverdave is really trying. After losing so much, the only thing that Raver should be trying is to pull back and rebuild. Dave Baranyi

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 6:10:55 AM)
...but did anybody tell it Raverdave ????[;)]

Raverdave -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 1:38:33 PM)
Pull back ??????????????????? Is that not simply a nice way of saying retreat???????

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 1:41:47 PM)
it is but allied potential is not only in carriers so i doubt i will see quiet 6 months as forecasted that's why i stand ready

jumper -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 2:45:26 PM)
Hi, the main problem with allies is that no matter how hard they are beaten, they keep coming back. You kick them out of the door - they are coming back through the window.. [:D] It will be interesting "what if" game. Not easy for both sides for much longer period than usual.. Good fun for both of you (Go, Japan, go.. !!! - I can´t resist[;)])

Raverdave -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 2:55:39 PM)
With no carriers i am forced to go under the cover of land based aircraft.....that makes it easy for sneer to determin where I will hit next.

veji1 -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 3:11:24 PM)
yeah, but the thing is, Japan can do something against allied carriers even late in war, it is very hard to pull, but it is possible to manage something... but against allied LBA... when 200 bombers and 80 P38 go for a base, even the best jap sentais can't do anything after the first day...

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 3:29:02 PM)
in think that i'm able to stand such force even after 3rd day - at least in southern DEI

veji1 -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 3:46:06 PM)
well I can't wait to see that... The thing is you might be able to pull that once or twice, but what then ? he comes back 2 weeks later having recuperated while your 90 exp samurais are gone forever...

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 3:57:03 PM)
i doubt i will loose so many of them during 2-3 weeks in long term you are right but think that my navy fighters are currently being rearmed to Jacks - it is one class higher equipment than zero family when it comes to fighting against bombers and durable fighters if I was able to halt 300 b 17 unescorted with zeros and tonys i think i will be able to halt the same force with p 38 with tonys and jacks

veji1 -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 4:16:58 PM)
you are right, no point in being gloomy, you are going to lose anyway... I can't wait to see the next battle...

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 4:28:59 PM)
3/14/43 uss barb sunk - confirmed

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 4:29:40 PM)
RN fleet is going to Darwin area so maybe you will not wait long

Raverdave -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 4:37:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sneer RN fleet is going to Darwin area so maybe you will not wait long [sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif][sm=00000280.gif] What game are you looking at ?????????????????????????[:D]

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 4:39:00 PM)
ours recon found CA BB later BB and avenger I was spotted at perth

BrucePowers -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 4:39:37 PM)
Raver; Without revealing too much, how are you doing. Has he hurt you too bad. I realize loose lips can sink ships.

Ron Saueracker -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 5:02:07 PM)
I want to see the sunk ship list!![:D]

Raverdave -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 5:08:50 PM)
Yup I am crippled at this point.....at least from the POV of naval ships. I would love to post the sunk ships list but it would take up too much bandwidth to post it.[:D] Sneer.....just because your sub thought they saw a BB does not make it a BB[:D] But if you want to think that I have have BBs in Perth go right ahead. Two moves ago my spotter planes reported a CA near Timor.....turns out to be a sub[8\|]

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 5:08:59 PM)
i will publicate within few hours if there is interest

Page: << < prev 25 26 [27] 28 29 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.59375