RE: convoy intercepted

RE: convoy intercepted (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports

Message

Ron Saueracker -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 6:20:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sneer i will publicate within few hours if there is interest Just the major warships named would suffice for curiosity sake. Simple numbers of smaller ships like AKs would be of interest too just to see the breadth of the destruction.[:)]

Sneer -> losses (6/14/2006 6:33:24 PM)
losses inflicted /losses received CV 7:0 Essex,Saratoga,lexington,hornet,enterprise,wasp,indomitable CVL 1:1 hermes,Zuiho CVE 4:0 Sangamon,Altmaha,chenango,Copahee BB fast 6:0 Indiana,S.dakota,washington,N.carolina,Prince of wales,Repulse BB slow 7:0 W.Virginia,N.mexico,Idaho,Tennessee,California,Nevada,Revenge Cruisers CA 8:0 CLAA 2:0 CL 15:4 Destroyers/DE /APD 60:8 Subs 48:16 Auxilaries (including ML/DM/DMS) 92:35 TK/AO 50:0 AK/AP 240:29

BrucePowers -> RE: losses (6/14/2006 6:41:38 PM)
Ooooh. That's gotta hurt. Ouch

Sneer -> air losses (6/14/2006 6:41:42 PM)
total losses - most important figures wildcats 490 hurricanes 488 M2zero 416 Oscar 393 Sally 378 B17 366 Helen 336 SBD 318 P40B 287 Kate 281 I16c 259 Wellington 212 Tojo 189 Dinah II 160 Avenger 157 P40E 154 Val 139 M3Zero 134 P38 127 Nell 127 Betty 104 Hudson 103 catalina 98 Buffalo 94 Sworfish 91 etc

veji1 -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 6:59:30 PM)
scaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaary... BBs don't respawn, and that's gonna hurt when bombarding of invaded islands is going to be needed, and for protection of landing forces when you'll send surface tfs to mess with them...

Sneer -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:09:08 PM)
that's why BB were chosen as target during last battle pursuit

Sneer -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:13:40 PM)
BTW allied side still has quite a lot of them 3 old "R"class + warspite + malaya in RN I think 6 old US BBs too + new coming US fast BBs + many cruisers he still have advantage in broadside

veji1 -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:23:58 PM)
allies always have advantage in everything.... Whenever this advantage becomes marginal instead of overwhelming it is a victory...:)

Mike Solli -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:39:21 PM)
R Class = Target [;)]

Sneer -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:42:58 PM)
"R" class is fearsome beast in night short range engagement and always good to kill my atolls i would change my Fuso /Ise types for them never underestimate enemy

Mike Solli -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:46:10 PM)
No, I don't underestimate the enemy, usually.[:D] I've found that if I can take the Andaman Islands early (and put some Emily and Nell/Bettys there), those R Class are dead meat. They can't make it anywhere before they are turned into Swiss cheese.

Sneer -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 7:48:26 PM)
my enemy made this error and lost Revenge early - bombarded Rangoon when i moved planes to moulmain now "R"class moves always with carriers

invernomuto -> RE: losses (6/14/2006 10:08:54 PM)
/invernomuto joins Sneer Fans Club...

Ron Saueracker -> RE: air losses (6/14/2006 10:11:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sneer "R" class is fearsome beast in night short range engagement and always good to kill my atolls i would change my Fuso /Ise types for them never underestimate enemy Especially with BigBs funnel cap equipped profile!!! Mean buggers.[:D]

Ursa MAior -> RE: losses (6/14/2006 10:46:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sneer losses inflicted /losses received CV 7:0 Essex,Saratoga,lexington,hornet,enterprise,wasp,indomitable CVL 1:1 hermes,Zuiho CVE 4:0 Sangamon,Altmaha,chenango,Copahee BB fast 6:0 Indiana,S.dakota,washington,N.carolina,Prince of wales,Repulse BB slow 7:0 W.Virginia,N.mexico,Idaho,Tennessee,California,Nevada,Revenge Cruisers CA 8:0 CLAA 2:0 CL 15:4 Destroyers/DE /APD 60:8 Subs 48:16 Auxilaries (including ML/DM/DMS) 92:35 TK/AO 50:0 AK/AP 240:29 How could you sink 4 fast BBs? Their AAA is awesome.

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/14/2006 11:38:52 PM)
N.carolina was bombed by KB and heavy shelled by BB at Pago harbour washington was damaged and detached from Air TF ( i think) S.dakota was damaged probably the same way as washington and indiana had a duel with musashi at night and was finished when crippled by planes - whole story of this huge almost 2 week battle is few page earlier - all of this happened 2 month of game time earlier

Raverdave -> No wuckers! (6/15/2006 12:27:32 PM)
Regardless of what I have lost so far (as painful as those losses were) I am still in an aggressive mood and looking for blood and capable of dealing out some lumps of my own.

Sneer -> RE: No wuckers! (6/15/2006 12:48:03 PM)
convoy battle near Darwin i moved nells to lautem and koepang koepang mission failed to launch and was caught by b17 but second group ( escorted one ) managed to score few hits AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 03/16/43 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASW attack at 59,71 Japanese Ships DD Hayate DD Mutsuki DD Ushio DD Usugumo DD Yukikaze DD Hatsukaze Allied Ships SS Halibut, hits 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on Lautem , at 33,78 Japanese aircraft no flights Allied aircraft P-38G Lightning x 3 B-17E Fortress x 96 Japanese aircraft losses G3M Nell: 4 destroyed Allied aircraft losses B-17E Fortress: 13 damaged Japanese ground losses: 154 casualties reported Guns lost 6 Airbase hits 16 Airbase supply hits 13 Runway hits 32 Aircraft Attacking: 8 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 7 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 4 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet 3 x B-17E Fortress bombing at 10000 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 30,83 Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 27 G3M Nell x 7 G4M1 Betty x 33 Allied aircraft Brewster 339D x 6 Japanese aircraft losses G4M1 Betty: 5 damaged Allied aircraft losses Brewster 339D: 6 destroyed Allied Ships AK Steel Navigator, Torpedo hits 2, on fire AK Admiral Williams, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage AK Lahaina AK Kahuku, Torpedo hits 1 AK Steel Exporter, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage Aircraft Attacking: 3 x G3M Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 1 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 3 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G3M Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet 2 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 3 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet 4 x G4M1 Betty launching torpedoes at 200 feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day Air attack on TF at 30,83 Japanese aircraft A6M2 Zero x 22 G3M Nell x 3 Allied aircraft Brewster 339D x 2 Japanese aircraft losses G3M Nell: 1 damaged Allied Ships AK Steel Exporter, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage Aircraft Attacking: 3 x G3M Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet

veji1 -> RE: No wuckers! (6/15/2006 12:58:25 PM)
well you still have your LBA, so even if you can hardly conquer anything on land for months to come, you can already severly weaken his indian and eastern DEI holdings... But it would sure be braver to charge head on in cenpac....

Sneer -> RE: No wuckers! (6/15/2006 1:01:43 PM)
My bet is Raverdave will sonner or later try surprise cenpac assault

Sneer -> RE: No wuckers! (6/15/2006 1:40:12 PM)
03/17/43 night bombardment of tenimbar 27 allied planes destroyed 03/18/43 previously damaged AK sunk at Wyndham

Sneer -> darwin disaster (6/15/2006 3:29:41 PM)
rushing turns brings sometimes unpleasant results - little warning to all WITP maniacs i waited with light forces for enemy shipping at isle next to tenimbar close to amboina this night they were ordered to check for enemy barges unfortunately i did not unlock their patrol order and enemy bombers found them at enemy harbour during day phase 4 tomozuru class DD sunk 1 fubuki class is damaged looks like time to slow down and check all things every turn[8\|]

Raverdave -> RE: darwin disaster (6/15/2006 4:09:16 PM)
Cenpac eh ? so thats where you think I'll strike hard and fast next eh? Well time will tell. Nice to get a handful of Jap DDs........The battle North of Darwin is starting to scale up and it is getting bloody.

BrucePowers -> RE: darwin disaster (6/15/2006 4:10:40 PM)
I am still looking for Raver to come back strong. He probably has a few surprises up his sleeve.

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/15/2006 4:31:47 PM)
DDs were human error like your convoy do not count on repeat BTW you have advantage in region and I see more allied blood till moment Cenpac -not now - somewhere within 3-5 months when you recognize KB busy around darwin -

Raverdave -> RE: darwin disaster (6/15/2006 4:32:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BrucePowers I am still looking for Raver to come back strong. He probably has a few surprises up his sleeve. [sm=00000506.gif] [;)]

BrucePowers -> RE: darwin disaster (6/15/2006 4:36:58 PM)
Never having gotten very far in this game (my own fault, other priorities) how long does it take you guys to input a turn before sending it. I realize when planning an invasion more time is required.

Raverdave -> RE: darwin disaster (6/15/2006 5:03:41 PM)
Takes me about 20 mintues on average....sometimes only 10 and other times upto an hour.

Sneer -> RE: darwin disaster (6/15/2006 5:05:15 PM)
10-15 min unless major operation underway - sometimes twice that

Sneer -> RE: convoy intercepted (6/15/2006 5:11:59 PM)
it takes ap 30 min for us both to issue order and next 30 min to technical issue upload - transfer between mail servers and download so in good time we do 1 turn /hour

Page: << < prev 26 27 [28] 29 30 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.6875