Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
- 7/13/2000 3:02:00 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
Charles; but at an angle of 30 degrees. even at 120mm thickness, an AoI of 30 degrees would be difficult for most Allied weapons to penetrate. That would even give a Russian 85mm a tough time. I'd could see the Tiger I mantlet/Turret rating being parred down to around 145-150. Even if there's still some controversy, that would still make the Tiger the tough opponent we all know it to be. It just would'nt be invincible from that quarter anymore

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 61
- 7/13/2000 3:21:00 AM   
Charles22

 

Posts: 912
Joined: 5/17/2000
From: Dallas, Texas, USA
Status: offline
As I've seen before, there are those who want to water down history, and there are those who do not. A Tiger without history to it, whatever that may be, IS NOT a Tiger, but a figment on what people think is "fair". I'm not interested in buttering down units, but rather in dealing with them. I wholly intend on dealing with them when fighting as the Soviets. I have my ways.... (diabolical laughter at this point) In playing as the Soviets, I've seen a Finnish sniper slay a KVI on it's side armor (the sniper only has a rifle)!!! Soviets have a lovely little cheap unit called partisans (recon no less) which costs like 5 points for six men (now that's a deal!), which have a rifle and some grenade or something. I will find my ways, I will find my ways.....(even more diabolical laughter)

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 62
- 7/13/2000 3:50:00 AM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline
A sniper shot with its rifle and killed a KV? That ain't supposed to happen...At what range? ITs possible it could hit and tehcrew bail (if they were VERY poor) but it is supposedly impossible for small arms calss weapons to penetrate any armor in the game.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 63
- 7/13/2000 4:02:00 AM   
Charles22

 

Posts: 912
Joined: 5/17/2000
From: Dallas, Texas, USA
Status: offline
Just seen it happen on battle one of my campaign, yesterday. They close-assaulted it with their daring rifle. They may had even hit the front turret, as I made sure and turned the turret that way before going forward one hex. It wasn't a cheap bailout either, the blooming thing was all-out destroyed. [This message has been edited by Charles22 (edited 07-12-2000).]

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 64
- 7/13/2000 4:06:00 AM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline
Ah in close assault ... PHEW...there is a 1% chance per man in a unit that they will find a way :-) It just happens to list the weapon. Shot the driver through the vision slit and the thing swerved off the road and tipped over or something...Thanks!

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 65
- 7/13/2000 4:12:00 AM   
JJU57

 

Posts: 54
Joined: 6/9/2000
From: Chicago, IL. USA
Status: offline
I think the 1% chance is too high, especially without the necessary weapons. At your rate 1 out of 100 tanks that passed the sniper would be killed. Is there anyway to reduce that figure? Also does this mean that a 2 man crew had a 2% chance or just two 1% chances?

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 66
- 7/13/2000 5:51:00 AM   
Jon Grasham

 

Posts: 70
Joined: 5/8/2000
From: St.Louis, MO, US
Status: offline
hehe, nice that there IS that chance for those times when your SOL. Also gives some funny things to think about. The sniper who blew the tank up by beating it with his rifle butt, which caused a small spark, which landed in some fuel the crew had carelessly spilt back in the supply area, the flames made it inside, and boom! :-)

_____________________________

?

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 67
- 7/13/2000 6:08:00 AM   
Fabio Prado

 

Posts: 503
Joined: 5/23/2000
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Paul Vebber: Thanks Fabio! The 130 APDS penetration at 30 degrees and 500 yards, agrees favorably with the 170-ish value in the game. I guess I mistook the deflected APCBC shot, been a while since I read that book. Is there a range for 6# APDS or 17lber or other shell that gives the estimated range for penetration? AT least we know that at 1200 yards the thing is fairly proof against 6# APDS :-)
Yes, for the 17 pounder. "Turret Mantlet at 40 degrees - 17 pounder APDS Strikes on this somewhat restricted target produced one fair hit which completely defeated the mantlet at 3482 ft/s. Round 43, passing through a thickened section of the casting and breaking up on the right side gun recoil cylinder casing. Further shooting was not possible owing to lack of space (too many rounds had been fired at this mantlet). It seems, however, that defeat would be likely up to a range of 1500 yards." FAP ------------------ Fabio Prado [email]fprado@fprado.com[/email] Webmaster - The ARMOR Site!

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 68
- 7/13/2000 6:13:00 AM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline
Well its actually less than 1% because in order to get to the 1% a number checks are made for the sniper and the target. For some of these things one must remember its a game and if you make chances too small then why bother? History books are full of instances of weird things happening. Who knows what the real chances are? We assumed it was proportional to the number of men. The assumption being that troops often had a grenade or stick of C4 or something squirreled away, or maybe they found one on a nearby dead enemy? Adapt, Improvise, Overcome :-)

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 69
- 7/13/2000 1:58:00 PM   
Scipio Africanus

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 6/21/2000
From: Somerville, Ma, USA
Status: offline
I have a question. As everyone seems very concerned that US ordnance cannot penetrate the front turret of the Tiger I (in theory, of course, this very thing has happened to me courtesy of APCR), was it actually that easy? In fact, were there any attested front turret Tiger I kills by US guns smaller than the 90mm L50? ------------------ Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus

_____________________________

Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 70
- 7/13/2000 9:16:00 PM   
JJU57

 

Posts: 54
Joined: 6/9/2000
From: Chicago, IL. USA
Status: offline
In playing Wild Bill's scenario 100 I had 10 Shermans going against a lone Tiger. I finally destroyed it after losing 7 tanks and one bailed crew. This seems about right to me.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 71
- 7/13/2000 9:27:00 PM   
Charles22

 

Posts: 912
Joined: 5/17/2000
From: Dallas, Texas, USA
Status: offline
The thing that worried me about the sniper maniac, was that I'm under the belief that the Finn was highly experienced, while the KVI was not, and that this disparency alone made the assault actually very likely to do just what it did, without the armor being taken into consideration. BTW, for the snipr to have shot someonoe in the slit, the sniper would have to be not around the side of the tank, but the front. I would assume that there would be some way of securing the hatch from the inside, so that opening the hatch was unlikely. Who knows maybe it can be accounted for by blowing the engine, that is, if the engine had no armor protection to withstand a sniper rifle blast (and I assume it does). I don't recall the oods on the attack "hitting", during the assault, but it seems as though I saw 24% flash across.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 72
- 7/13/2000 10:51:00 PM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline
Again I simply offered a possibility for how the sniper (or any other inf unit) might take out a tank. There are any number of possibilities. As I've siad before, for infantry units trying to account for ammo in "shots" is pretty contrived, resupply hapened all teh time and scrounging and "holding out" was common in all armies. FOr infantry think of your self as teh COmbat Team CO, You know what the supply guys say teh unit has for ammo, but you can figure that for dire situations, an AT mine, or extra bazooka round, or thrown mortar shell or whatever may be around. THat is what that small percentage chance of assault is supposed to represent.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 73
- 7/13/2000 11:33:00 PM   
Charles22

 

Posts: 912
Joined: 5/17/2000
From: Dallas, Texas, USA
Status: offline
Or maybe even a pointed stick, right?

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 74
- 7/14/2000 1:45:00 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
Here's what i really want to know.... now that i currently hold responsibility for creating the board's longest thread.....do i get my very own Tiger? Nikademus -A King Tiger can give you a definate edge.....on I-5 ;-)

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 75
- 7/14/2000 3:02:00 AM   
Charles22

 

Posts: 912
Joined: 5/17/2000
From: Dallas, Texas, USA
Status: offline
Nikademus: Nah, perhaps we could give you some of the SS training, where you dig a trench for yourself before it runs you over. Like the sniper you could scrounge up whatever may be lying on the ground around you: AT mine, forgotten about mortar shell, beer bottle, nice box of chocolates. Perhaps that's what's killing those KVIs, those snipers find chocolates and the KVI driver's so overjoyed that he blew up the tank himself.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 76
- 7/14/2000 3:40:00 AM   
Larry Holt

 

Posts: 1969
Joined: 3/31/2000
From: Atlanta, GA 30068
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Nikademus: Here's what i really want to know.... now that i currently hold responsibility for creating the board's longest thread.....do i get my very own Tiger? Nikademus -A King Tiger can give you a definate edge.....on I-5 ;-)
Yes you do, one complementary Tiger. Just send in 40,000 Reichmarks for postage and handling. Please allow 6 to 8 weeks for delivery. ------------------ An old soldier but not yet a faded one. OK, maybe just a bit faded.

_____________________________

Never take counsel of your fears.

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 77
- 7/14/2000 7:25:00 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
and for my final test i must stand pefectly at attention while Herr Wittmann shoots an apple off my head with a PzGr40 round. ;-)

_____________________________


(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 78
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.375