Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Late February 1863

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War 1861-1865 >> RE: Late February 1863 Page: <<   < prev  17 18 19 [20] 21   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 3:59:48 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Taking a closer look at my armies, supply does need some attention. I'm most worried about Sherman's Kentucky army. I'll need them in fighting trim real soon I suspect.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 571
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:02:04 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		So here's the new allocations. I'll leave 1st corp alone. They are cut off and in trouble anyway. No sense pumping a lot of money into supplies that may never reach them. Kentucky is where I'll focus and I'll give high priority to the really low units and medium priority to the units with mid-level supply. Potomac likely still won't fight in the near future, so they'll stay put with low supply.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 572
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:10:09 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And with the hightened diplomatic spending and the higher supply spending, cash flow dives straight into the ground. Oh well, it can't be helped. I need both right now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 573
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:16:03 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		It appears a few advances will be achieves soon on the technology front. Might be a good time to compare who has what now.

I've got a lot more weaponry, but am way behind on logistics. In hindsight, I should have invested in logistics instead of weaponry. Beyond those improved springfields that I really did need, I haven't really taken advantage of the majority of my investment there. On the plus side, the Invalid Corps is one of the most important logistics upgrade and while it is my only one, it is one he still doesn't have. The other one I really wish I had was Extended Service.

He's also ahead of me in training. I'd like to catch him in target practice.

His navy isn't shown, but he has 1 to my 2. Then again, let's not talk navy please. Tech or not, I've not done well there at all.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 574
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:17:14 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Sure enough... 2 upgrades. The first is another weapon upgrade. I'll take light recoil and just trust that it will somehow help in battle.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 575
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:19:22 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And for the second, I get my wish. There are a lot of good logistics options including canning which would help my current supply situation. But what I most need is Extended service to get my brigade sizes up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 576
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:25:27 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Quick turnaround, so here we go again....

We know the Tallahassee forces were butchered, so this warning isn't a surprise. What is concerning is that I do not see anything about a siege of the fort outside of Nashville. I must have forgotten to initiative that last turn. Ooops.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 577
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:28:55 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Another 10,000 lost . sigh.

And the conscriptions don't appear to have gone over very well. We lost a barracks. And in some cases, I didn't even check to ensure the city had enough manpower to create a unit. Ooops again. Need to be more careful.

When I first saw the reinforcement needs just to 191,000 I freaked out and wondered what the heck I did wrong. Then I remembered the extended service advance. That number just represents the additional capacity in my brigades, so it is a good thing and not just massive losses to be replaced.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 578
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:31:10 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Looks like we lost a corp commander in that last fight. oh well, so go the fortunes of war. Looks like my diplomatic spending for England and Europe paid off, but so did his. We both went up with England. I would have prefered to offset one another or both go down. All I care about really is keeping his relationships soured. With Europe, we did offset.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 579
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:36:49 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		The situation out west isn't looking good. My siege forces FINALLY moved! And wouldn't you know it - he get there before I did. Even more worrisome though is that Hood and Jackson seem to have a very significant combined force. If they march against Sherman, they'll be considered the defenders and even though that's my best army, I'm not sure it can withstand his combined force. If he marches north and boots me out of there a second time, that might be the war. Hopefully, he'll keep his focus on the weakened siege armies and let me take this province. Thus far though, he hasn't proven to be that stupid so the end of this war might be near.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 580
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:39:30 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		It appears Montgomery is undefended. I'll move the corp down to capitalize (something I am relieved he hasn't done with my depleted rear cities).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 581
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:41:39 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And the second Army will move to Yazoo. Because I still control the river province, I can extend my reach from there. My hope is that he'll chase me, but if not I'll just focus on grabbing land in Arkansas with this depleted unit as I work my way back home through a route other than right through his main army.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 582
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 4:46:21 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		That's it for now.  All-in-all, I'm now officially worried.  He controls the seas.  We're in a stand-off in the east.  Out west, I suspect I he now has the upperhand and he can potentially land a crushing blow on Sherman in Nashville.  I've lost a lot of men.  Willpower is low.  Support from the governors is mixed and I've been ignoring them for way too long.  I've currently behind on both the technology and diplomacy fronts.  And time is not on my side.  At what point do I cut my losses and let these rebels do as they want?  Perhaps my last ace is emancipation, but I shutter to think of giving them another pile of troops to work with when my own ranks are already so depleted. 

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 583
RE: Late February 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:23:59 AM   
jonreb31


Posts: 714
Joined: 11/26/2006
From: Santa Cruz, California
Status: offline 		Hold in there.

_____________________________


(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 584
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:25:22 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		The siege in Cumberland is going very very well now that it is finally going. Everyone should pay close attention to the difference between this result and what we were seeing earlier. Having the proper engineering and artillery makes a HUGE difference.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 585
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:29:04 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Defense reduced to 1! I came THAT close to capturing the fort. That one point means I can't take the city this turn. Darn. Luck isn't blowing my way at present. Oh well, at least I am absolutely sure I'll take the fort this coming turn.

Looks like he attacked my Navy in harbor and won yet again. Before this is all over, I might not have any Navy left to reinforce. Looks like he won another battle with the junk forces and I lost another dozen brigades. That was a total waste. I've given his boys a lot of combat experience and reduced my ranks significantly.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 586
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:30:31 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And just when things seemed to be at their lowest, disease hits Cumberland river. heh heh. Sometimes when it rains, it pours. OK, this'll hurt.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 587
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:34:31 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		The pain continues. I haven't done the math, but at a rough glance I seem to have lost at least 25% of my largest army. Ouch.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 588
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:36:45 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		That's a lot of losses and some lost disposition to boot. At least he didn't come after me. Let's hope that remains so or else I am really in trouble.

At least we end on some good news - we made some progress with diplomacy.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 589
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:39:23 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		One more piece of good news - he only destroyed the siege army. The corp escaped to Montgomery before he got there. OK, now I'll unload several brigades into the city and watch it turn a lovely shade of blue. That ought to get his attention. I'll unload the remaining brigades into the fort in Pensacola just to let them resupply. And then I'll move the empty armies to the river where they will die off. Good bye corp. At least those were some of my worst containers that I'm sacrificing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 590
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:41:03 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		The western siege army is empty but didn't go away. Looks like a bug. I'll move it over a province but I suspect it will die off this turn as well and leave an explosion of officers as we saw in Florida.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 591
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 6:43:23 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Not much else to show because there's not much else to do. I'll buy some weapons for a few AoP units and try to upgrade weapons on a few more ships to see if I can make him pay for the carnage he's causing, but that's it. The main action is in Nashville where I am just continuing the siege and hoping his Montgomery gaffe will keep him busy long enough to let me take Nashville.

One more upgrade. I'm not sure this will help much, but it can't hurt...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 592
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:00:37 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		I wish I could report otherwise, but the war is all but lost. Only desperate last straws remain within my grasp.

Let us begin with some good news though. Ft. Donelson was destroyed and the road to Nashville is now open.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 593
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:03:23 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And now on to the more sobering reality. Some forces remained in Montgomery and did not make it to Pensacola and they were engaged and destroyed.

The truly bad news though is that he attacked Cumberland river and the results were even worse than I feared. nearly 40,000 of Sherman's army was destroyed. There is precious little left of the only proper fighting force I was able to field. National will is now nearing the outermost limit of negativity.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 594
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:04:40 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And a few others details that honestly don't much matter at present. sigh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 595
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:06:44 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Looking at the strength graph, it is obviously just how badly we have suffered of late. In the past 18 months, I have turned a remarkable manpower advantage into a substantial deficit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 596
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:09:48 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		So, as a final measure of desperation, there is nothing left to do but emancipate. That will address my diplomacy disadvantage. It will raise my National Will back somwhat (while not helping him much since he is near the top of the chart). And it will make his manpower advantage even greater. Frankly, I don't see this really solving my problems, but there is precious little else left to try. I'll be left with a fairly hefty cash advantage since diplomacy will be helped and since I have significantly fewer troops to support, but I fear there will not be time available to use it to rebuild my army in the manner that will be required to win this war.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 597
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:13:16 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		Sherman will move to Bowling Green to hopefully score some cheap experience. At this point though, my options are severely limited.

His Navy went to harbor - perhaps out of pity. I'll start the ironclad I've been wanting to build. I'll need at least one more after that to stand any chance at sea.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 598
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/20/2006 9:15:34 AM   
jchastain


Posts: 2164
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: Marietta, GA
Status: offline 		And I end my turn with a Naval advance. It almost feels like the game is mocking me now. But I should be thankful since I am trying to put together a defensive navy. An invasion in New England would truly seal my fate once and for all (or more precisely would seal it even tighter then it already is.)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 599
RE: Late March 1863 - 12/28/2006 7:31:03 AM   
Joram

 

Posts: 3198
Joined: 7/15/2005
Status: offline 		Hang in there jchastain!  Don't give up on the Union! 

(in reply to jchastain)
Post #: 600
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 19 [20] 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War 1861-1865 >> RE: Late February 1863 Page: <<   < prev  17 18 19 [20] 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719