Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

2 bugs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War 1861-1865 >> Public Beta Feedback >> 2 bugs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
2 bugs - 5/7/2007 8:38:21 PM   
Mr. Yuck


Posts: 103
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Asheville, NC, USA
Status: offline
I downloaded the latest beta patch yesterday and I've noticed two things:

1.) The governor of Illinois does not recognize troops in Vandalia as counting toward his brigade request. He ignored their presence for several turns and I did not get a thank-you until I placed them elsewhere in the state.

2.) If you do a large number of musters, there is a chance that a named unit will show up twice. I have two "Sykes Regulars".
Post #: 1
RE: 2 bugs - 5/7/2007 9:12:17 PM   
Walloc

 

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline
2nd is known and on the to do fix list, as far as i know.
It can happend to LUs starting in a scn, that a 2nd LU is mustered/conscriped/bought.


Kind regards,

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 5/7/2007 9:18:05 PM >

(in reply to Mr. Yuck)
Post #: 2
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 12:58:07 AM   
Gray_Lensman


Posts: 640
Joined: 4/10/2003
Status: offline
 
It's no wonder about Vandalia... Vandalia is province #135 per "AcwProvinces.txt".  Looking into "AcwStates.txt" shows province #135 as part of Iowa.  Woops... The Midwest is being grabbed up by Iowa.  It also shows up as Vandalia, IA on the map instead of Vandalia, IL.  I don't recall this error being in the previous versions, but the AcwStates file shows it was accessed/modified 4/7/2007.

edit:
Summary:

1) Vandalia (province id #135) is incorrectly listed as an Iowa province instead of an Illinois province.

2) Charlotte (province id #218) is incorrectly listed as both a Georgia province and a North Carolina province in "AcwStates.txt", causing it to show up as a GA province, presumably because it is the first in the list.

Not sure if the following are oversights or deliberate, but according to the Note on pg 28 of the manual. "Some river provinces straddle state lines. River provinces, however, are nevertheless always controlled by one state or another.

3) Upper Tennessee R. (province id #246) is not controlled, by Tennessee, yet it runs right thru it.

4) Arkansas Miss R. (province id #206) is not controlled by either Arkansas or Mississippi.

5) Upper Missouri R. (province id# 236) is not controlled by either Missouri or Kansas

6) Potomac River is not controlled by Maryland, however, this is most likely intentional, but for the Maryland governor's sake, I wonder if it should count as a Maryland province for garrison purposes.

All the above are easy to mod, but hey, v1.9.16e anyone, especially for those not so disposed to make their own mods.
I confirmed that these were all preexisting in v1.9.4, also, so at least they were not introduced during the current beta building process.

< Message edited by Gray_Lensman -- 5/8/2007 2:34:50 AM >

(in reply to Walloc)
Post #: 3
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 4:59:23 AM   
Gil R.


Posts: 10821
Joined: 4/1/2005
Status: offline
Hooray! None of those errors is my fault! (Unlike those glitches in the generals file that led to patches 16a-d.)

Thanks for pointing this out.

(in reply to Gray_Lensman)
Post #: 4
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 8:44:34 PM   
cesteman


Posts: 845
Joined: 2/15/2004
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Status: offline
D? We now have a version D?? Great I have C

(in reply to Gil R.)
Post #: 5
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 9:27:17 PM   
jkBluesman


Posts: 797
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cesteman

D? We now have a version D?? Great I have C


Look here for further details.

(in reply to cesteman)
Post #: 6
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 10:26:03 PM   
Drex

 

Posts: 2524
Joined: 9/13/2000
From: Chico,california
Status: offline
I think I was still on a.

_____________________________

quote:

Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"

(in reply to jkBluesman)
Post #: 7
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 11:34:32 PM   
Klahn

 

Posts: 184
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gray_Lensman

 
6) Potomac River is not controlled by Maryland, however, this is most likely intentional, but for the Maryland governor's sake, I wonder if it should count as a Maryland province for garrison purposes.



Out of curiosity, why would this be intentional? (Newbie here)

(in reply to Gray_Lensman)
Post #: 8
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 11:42:39 PM   
Twotribes


Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline
Because Washington DC is in the province and it is NOT part of any State.

(in reply to Klahn)
Post #: 9
RE: 2 bugs - 5/8/2007 11:50:33 PM   
Klahn

 

Posts: 184
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twotribes

Because Washington DC is in the province and it is NOT part of any State.


I understand that, but is there a drawback in game terms if it's just thrown in together with Maryland?

I'm just wondering if there could be an issue with the Gov. of Maryland complaining about a lack of brigades to defend his state while the entire AoP is camped in the river province.

(in reply to Twotribes)
Post #: 10
RE: 2 bugs - 5/9/2007 1:31:48 AM   
Gray_Lensman


Posts: 640
Joined: 4/10/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ryvan

<snip>

I'm just wondering if there could be an issue with the Gov. of Maryland complaining about a lack of brigades to defend his state while the entire AoP is camped in the river province.



Exactly my point !

(in reply to Klahn)
Post #: 11
RE: 2 bugs - 5/10/2007 2:00:25 AM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gray_Lensman

edit:
Summary:

1) Vandalia (province id #135) is incorrectly listed as an Iowa province instead of an Illinois province.

2) Charlotte (province id #218) is incorrectly listed as both a Georgia province and a North Carolina province in "AcwStates.txt", causing it to show up as a GA province, presumably because it is the first in the list.

Not sure if the following are oversights or deliberate, but according to the Note on pg 28 of the manual. "Some river provinces straddle state lines. River provinces, however, are nevertheless always controlled by one state or another.

3) Upper Tennessee R. (province id #246) is not controlled, by Tennessee, yet it runs right thru it.

4) Arkansas Miss R. (province id #206) is not controlled by either Arkansas or Mississippi.

5) Upper Missouri R. (province id# 236) is not controlled by either Missouri or Kansas

6) Potomac River is not controlled by Maryland, however, this is most likely intentional, but for the Maryland governor's sake, I wonder if it should count as a Maryland province for garrison purposes.

All the above are easy to mod, but hey, v1.9.16e anyone, especially for those not so disposed to make their own mods.
I confirmed that these were all preexisting in v1.9.4, also, so at least they were not introduced during the current beta building process.

Anyone made a quickfix for this?

< Message edited by Tanaka -- 5/12/2007 8:03:40 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Gray_Lensman)
Post #: 12
RE: 2 bugs - 5/10/2007 4:16:53 PM   
ericbabe


Posts: 11927
Joined: 3/23/2005
Status: offline
For my own preference, I wouldn't want Washington DC part of Maryland. If the governor of Maryland decides to oppose muster, it shouldn't affect mustering in Washington, and so forth.

Also, if Washington were part of MD, then players would never have to draw troops away from DC to protect Annapolis or the Cumberland. If a player has all his units in Washington, I think it's perfectly fine for the MD governor to want to have some protection for Maryland proper.

< Message edited by ericbabe -- 5/10/2007 4:19:27 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 13
RE: 2 bugs - 5/10/2007 4:44:39 PM   
Gray_Lensman


Posts: 640
Joined: 4/10/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ericbabe

For my own preference, I wouldn't want Washington DC part of Maryland. If the governor of Maryland decides to oppose muster, it shouldn't affect mustering in Washington, and so forth.

Also, if Washington were part of MD, then players would never have to draw troops away from DC to protect Annapolis or the Cumberland. If a player has all his units in Washington, I think it's perfectly fine for the MD governor to want to have some protection for Maryland proper.


Sounds reasonable to me.

(in reply to ericbabe)
Post #: 14
RE: 2 bugs - 5/26/2007 8:10:36 AM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gray_Lensman

edit:
Summary:

1) Vandalia (province id #135) is incorrectly listed as an Iowa province instead of an Illinois province.

2) Charlotte (province id #218) is incorrectly listed as both a Georgia province and a North Carolina province in "AcwStates.txt", causing it to show up as a GA province, presumably because it is the first in the list.

Not sure if the following are oversights or deliberate, but according to the Note on pg 28 of the manual. "Some river provinces straddle state lines. River provinces, however, are nevertheless always controlled by one state or another.

3) Upper Tennessee R. (province id #246) is not controlled, by Tennessee, yet it runs right thru it.

4) Arkansas Miss R. (province id #206) is not controlled by either Arkansas or Mississippi.

5) Upper Missouri R. (province id# 236) is not controlled by either Missouri or Kansas

6) Potomac River is not controlled by Maryland, however, this is most likely intentional, but for the Maryland governor's sake, I wonder if it should count as a Maryland province for garrison purposes.

All the above are easy to mod, but hey, v1.9.16e anyone, especially for those not so disposed to make their own mods.
I confirmed that these were all preexisting in v1.9.4, also, so at least they were not introduced during the current beta building process.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ericbabe

For my own preference, I wouldn't want Washington DC part of Maryland. If the governor of Maryland decides to oppose muster, it shouldn't affect mustering in Washington, and so forth.

Also, if Washington were part of MD, then players would never have to draw troops away from DC to protect Annapolis or the Cumberland. If a player has all his units in Washington, I think it's perfectly fine for the MD governor to want to have some protection for Maryland proper.


Hi besides number 6 listed in this post are the rest fixed in the next patch? Thanks!

< Message edited by Tanaka -- 5/26/2007 8:11:59 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to ericbabe)
Post #: 15
RE: 2 bugs - 5/26/2007 9:07:23 AM   
Gil R.


Posts: 10821
Joined: 4/1/2005
Status: offline
I believe so.

(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 16
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [American Civil War] >> Forge of Freedom: The American Civil War 1861-1865 >> Public Beta Feedback >> 2 bugs Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859