rcleslie
Posts: 123
Joined: 6/8/2006 Status: offline
|
I just read through this thread and it struck several chords: 1. I recently had a system "crash" that required reformatting my hard drive and reinstalling the OS (WinXP). I wanted to reinstall MaxFB and did so using MaxFB Setup Release - v1095DR which I have on disk. I then downloaded and installed the v13176 patch. All of this went without a hitch. So far I have played a few Quick Games and noticed that my old "too easy to win" problems have gone away; or so it seems for now. The game is now a whole lot better, i.e., more realistic and FUN TO PLAY! My concern at the moment is the question someone raised about which version is the "base" version. I assume anything labelled "Setup Release" is the base, or some version of it that may used with the latest patch to play the game with all features operating. 2. Prior to my "crash" and forced reinstallation I was installing each patch as it came along without resetting my leagues. I have a recollection that David Winter once suggested it was a good idea to reset leagues after installing a patch. Is this still correct? 3. I am now revisiting my attempts to print rosters, etc. I have downloaded and installed Open Office which is now my primary office tool. I have also downloaded MjH's program from FBMax.com to enable MAXFB players to work with MAXFB data bases via Open Office. I haven't tried it yet, but I have high hopes. Any how, many thanks to MjH and to whoever first suggested this to me many moons ago. Will there be day when the game will make all this easier, as in click "Print roster"? 4. This relates to the "too easy" issue and involves player ratings. I assume that it is not a good idea to change a player's position. That is, If I want a speedier RB than the draft gives me I ought not switch a 90+ DB to RB. I think it was Garysorrell's posting that advised against this sort of thing. (Thx again!) However, given that the game makes such switching possible will there be a time/version that makes this realistic? For example, DBs and WRs should be interchangeable (more or less) and ditto for RBs, TEs, and LBs (more or less)? I would be interested in the opinions of others on this.
|