Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

B17@Midway

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Carriers At War >> B17@Midway Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
B17@Midway - 6/12/2007 8:03:43 PM   
Prince of Eckmühl


Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline 		The game has B-17D deployed to Midway.

It should be B17E

PoE (aka ivanmoe)




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.
Post #: 1
RE: B17@Midway - 6/13/2007 12:21:29 AM   
blastpop


Posts: 395
Joined: 11/27/2005
From: Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

The game has B-17D deployed to Midway.

It should be B17E



Maybe so, but they still won't hit a darn thing!

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 2
RE: B17@Midway - 6/13/2007 1:46:22 AM   
jazman

 

Posts: 369
Joined: 1/20/2007
From: Crush Depth
Status: offline 		I was wondering about that.

There are some US marking anomalies, as well. Those B-17Ds have the early-war markings, and then the PBY Catalinas have the late-war Star-and-Bars. Hmm.

(in reply to blastpop)
Post #: 3
RE: B17@Midway - 6/14/2007 8:31:27 AM   
Prince of Eckmühl


Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline 		I really didn't pay much attention to the model number until I was examining some post mortem data, and discovered that the Japanese CAP was reported as having destroyed virtually all the Allied B-17, so I figured the victims must have been the "D" model (without tail guns, as depicted in the game's art). Even the earlier model was hard for Zeros to shoot down, BTW. The fighter's twin 20mm cannon had a low muzzle velocity and the shells dropped like rocks. They worked well enough in close, but their effectiveness declined precipitiously as the range opened, as was the attackers preferred stance when engaging anything with tailguns. Throw in the fact that the A6M2 only carried 60 rounds of cannon ammo, and you've got a truly anemic bomber-killer. I've often thought that the best thing to have done with a B-17 at Midway was to simply go bombless, load up with extra ammo, and then fly back and forth across the KB in formation, meting out futility to the approaching samurai/incendiaries. Would've made a heck of a show.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

< Message edited by Prince of Eckmühl -- 6/14/2007 8:33:13 AM >

_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to jazman)
Post #: 4
RE: B17@Midway - 6/14/2007 2:02:46 PM   
blastpop


Posts: 395
Joined: 11/27/2005
From: Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

I really didn't pay much attention to the model number until I was examining some post mortem data, and discovered that the Japanese CAP was reported as having destroyed virtually all the Allied B-17, so I figured the victims must have been the "D" model (without tail guns, as depicted in the game's art). Even the earlier model was hard for Zeros to shoot down, BTW. The fighter's twin 20mm cannon had a low muzzle velocity and the shells dropped like rocks. They worked well enough in close, but their effectiveness declined precipitiously as the range opened, as was the attackers preferred stance when engaging anything with tailguns. Throw in the fact that the A6M2 only carried 60 rounds of cannon ammo, and you've got a truly anemic bomber-killer. I've often thought that the best thing to have done with a B-17 at Midway was to simply go bombless, load up with extra ammo, and then fly back and forth across the KB in formation, meting out futility to the approaching samurai/incendiaries. Would've made a heck of a show.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)


Same thing happened to me to with my game of Midway. The B17's can't hit anything and make juicy targets as the scenario stands. Might be better to send them off against surface forces to increase survivability if such a force has been spotted and in range.

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 5
RE: B17@Midway - 6/14/2007 2:03:25 PM   
NimitsTexan

 

Posts: 63
Joined: 4/30/2004
From: United States
Status: offline 		There should be a mix of B-17Ds and B-17Es (mostly Es) at Midway. But that is not the only error. The Wake Island Scenario has G4Ms, when in reality they should be G3Ms.

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 6
RE: B17@Midway - 6/14/2007 3:52:17 PM   
Prince of Eckmühl


Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline 		There was, indeed, a B-17D at Midway, belonging to the 349th Bomb Squadron. Records indicate the presence of sixteen B-17E.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to NimitsTexan)
Post #: 7
RE: B17@Midway - 6/23/2007 2:25:35 AM   
Prince of Eckmühl


Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline 		This is paining me mightily.

I went to try and edit the Midway scenario with an eye toward upgrading this bird, and found that the B17D is the only model included in the game.

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

Oh, the horror...the horror.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 8
RE: B17@Midway - 6/23/2007 3:59:04 AM   
Unhappy

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 6/9/2007
Status: offline 		Here is a screen capture of a B-17E I made a resource file for. I'd post the .srf file if I could figure out how to do so. It doesn't look as good as the graphics included with the game but it is functional.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 9
RE: B17@Midway - 6/23/2007 8:14:06 AM   
Prince of Eckmühl


Posts: 2459
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline 		Hey, the art's awesome, particularly when compared to my Colonel Kurtz.

Now just give it a tail-gun, power-turrets, self-sealing fuel tanks and the USAAF shall rule!

PoE (aka ivanmoe)

Edit: As was the case IRL, it doesn't really have to hit anything. Still, it'll scare the **** out of those little, gnat thingies.




< Message edited by Prince of Eckmühl -- 6/23/2007 8:15:50 AM >

_____________________________

Government is the opiate of the masses.

(in reply to Unhappy)
Post #: 10
RE: B17@Midway - 6/23/2007 8:33:10 AM   
Kiwi Red One

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		Nice work Unhappy, looks very nice.

Any chance of sharing the steps you went through to create your B-17E file? Really appreciate it if you could

Cheers
KRO


quote:

ORIGINAL: Unhappy

Here is a screen capture of a B-17E I made a resource file for. I'd post the .srf file if I could figure out how to do so. It doesn't look as good as the graphics included with the game but it is functional.







(in reply to Unhappy)
Post #: 11
RE: B17@Midway - 6/23/2007 12:50:01 PM   
Marcus Caelius


Posts: 9
Joined: 11/9/2006
From: 44:57:19N, 73:16:18W
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Prince of Eckmühl

I went to try and edit the Midway scenario with an eye toward upgrading this bird, and found that the B17D is the only model included in the game.


IIRC from the original editor, you could add in your own aircraft. Come to think of it, I remember adding PT boats to the database in CAW.


_____________________________

Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of anything is almost always the most boring one imaginable."

(in reply to Prince of Eckmühl)
Post #: 12
RE: B17@Midway - 6/23/2007 6:17:25 PM   
Unhappy

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 6/9/2007
Status: offline 		I will post the steps I went through to create the resource file in the modding forum.

(in reply to Kiwi Red One)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Carriers At War >> B17@Midway Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.500