RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/27/2007 10:15:19 PM

mikemike

Posts: 501
Joined: 6/3/2004
From: a maze of twisty little passages, all different
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson

There were many people in the US profiting off of the Axis, especially Nazi Germany. Some are considered among America's "elite" families today.
Bill

Including the Bush family, from what I've heard. But don't overlook big business. Both Ford and GM built big truck factories in Germany after 1933 that contributed the majority of trucks needed for the mechanization of the Wehrmacht. You might say that the Soviet Union depended on Lend-Lease trucks imported from the USA, while Germany depended on US trucks built right in Germany.
Another story is that ITT apparently received compensation from the US government for bomb damage to their properties in Germany, which included Lorenz, one of the leading German avionics companies (they built a large part of the German RADAR equipment). I think there must have been other US corporations that were also compensated.

_____________________________

DON�T PANIC - IT�S ALL JUST ONES AND ZEROES!

(in reply to wdolson)

Post #: 61

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/27/2007 10:27:56 PM

Apollo11

Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikemike

Both Ford and GM built big truck factories in Germany after 1933 that contributed the majority of trucks needed for the mechanization of the Wehrmacht.

quote:

You might say that the Soviet Union depended on Lend-Lease trucks imported from the USA, while Germany depended on US trucks built right in Germany.

The Russians build the tanks but truckes were US made (i.e. "Land Lease") and those trucks played vital role in Russian advance in 1944 and 1945 (all those breakthroughs without proper supply and amlost "endless" columns of truck would be impossible)!

For Germans I doubt - they had really really serious truck problem entire war and their war machine was, at best, just 5-10% mechaniezd / truckized IIRC...

Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to mikemike)

Post #: 62

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/27/2007 11:20:44 PM

Mike Scholl

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikemike

Both Ford and GM built big truck factories in Germany after 1933 that contributed the majority of trucks needed for the mechanization of the Wehrmacht.

Are you sure about this? I am 99% certain that I read that US build factories were very very little used in WWII by germany (German trucks were strange mixture of all kinds of models - that was really big problem for logistics and supply and it was never solded in war).

quote:

You are correct. Ford's huge Adam Opel Plant wound up producing a few "camp stoves" before being bombed. The Nazi's were absolute idiots at "industrial mobilization" (for which we must all be greatfull). They didn't even make much intelligent use of the new VW plant that they themselves had created.

(in reply to Apollo11)

Post #: 63

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/27/2007 11:26:08 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11
For Germans I doubt - they had really really serious truck problem entire war and their war machine was, at best, just 5-10% mechaniezd / truckized IIRC...

Leo "Apollo11"

Yep - I have read over and over again that the German Army was largely horse-drawn in WWII, much contrary to the popular image.

(in reply to Apollo11)

Post #: 64

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/28/2007 1:53:15 AM

wdolson

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline

The German army always made heavy use of horses. After Stalingrad, it was even more demechanized. Virtually all their support vehicles became horse drawn. It was necessary to conserve oil. Plus most of the trucks they started the war with had worn out. The thrust into southern Russia in 1942 was to capture Russian oil fields and it failed.

Before Germany invaded the USSR, they were getting all the oil they needed from Stalin. They used trucks to transport troops and other support tasks during the Blitzkrieg as well as some during the first phases of the invasion of the USSR.

I can't recall if it was something I read from Len Deighton or John Kegan comparing the quality of equipment between armies. Most armies around the world recognized the need for a truck to support their operations in the late 30s. Germany, the UK, Italy, Czechloslovakia, and the US all built military trucks.

The Europeans had a well developed railroad network which serviced almost every corner of their countries. Everything was close together and population densities were high, so it was feasible to do this. Because of this, there was virtually no domestic market for commercial trucks. Military trucks had to be designed from the ground up and purpose built. The US had a lot of rural areas with low population densities where the railroads didn't go. There was a thriving private market for trucks that could drive on dirt roads all day, day after day and keep going. When the US Army decided it needed a truck, it went to the big 3 auto makers, who militarized trucks already in production. Not only was this cheaper, but it was starting with a proven design.

Today, American 6X6 military trucks are very cheap on the collector's market. France didn't retire the last of their WW II trucks until the mid-70s and some 3rd world countries are still using WW II vintage US built trucks. Collectors pay top dollar for anybody else's trucks from the WW II era because they are rare. Most of them fell apart before the war was over.

By the time Germany was defeated at Stalingrad, most of the truck fleet Germany had at the beginning of the war was gone. Mostly due to mechanical failure. Their factories were producing few replacements, since other vehicles had a higher priority. Since oil was getting to be a precious commodity, they didn't put any priority on producing more trucks and focused on horse trnsport.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 65

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/28/2007 9:00:53 PM

VSWG

Posts: 3432
Joined: 5/31/2006
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

I am 99% certain that I read that US build factories were very very little used in WWII by germany (German trucks were strange mixture of all kinds of models - that was really big problem for logistics and supply and it was never solded in war).

The Ford factory in Cologne (completed in 1930) continued to build trucks for the Wehrmacht until 1945. Only 2 bombs fell on it during the war. Why? Because officially it was still US property, so the United States Strategic Bombing Survey made sure that it would not be destroyed...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

You are correct. Ford's huge Adam Opel Plant wound up producing a few "camp stoves" before being bombed. The Nazi's were absolute idiots at "industrial mobilization" (for which we must all be greatfull). They didn't even make much intelligent use of the new VW plant that they themselves had created.

1. Opel was acquired by General Motors, not Ford.

2. Can you reference this information? Opel build the famous Blitz 3-ton truck throughout the war, although I don't know in which factories.

_____________________________

(in reply to Mike Scholl)

Post #: 66

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/28/2007 10:09:17 PM

Mike Scholl

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VSWG

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

I am 99% certain that I read that US build factories were very very little used in WWII by germany (German trucks were strange mixture of all kinds of models - that was really big problem for logistics and supply and it was never solded in war).

The Ford factory in Cologne (completed in 1930) continued to build trucks for the Wehrmacht until 1945. Only 2 bombs fell on it during the war. Why? Because officially it was still US property, so the United States Strategic Bombing Survey made sure that it would not be destroyed...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

You are correct. Ford's huge Adam Opel Plant wound up producing a few "camp stoves" before being bombed. The Nazi's were absolute idiots at "industrial mobilization" (for which we must all be greatfull). They didn't even make much intelligent use of the new VW plant that they themselves had created.

1. Opel was acquired by General Motors, not Ford. You are correct (that's what I get for using my memory instead of looking it up). What's worse, it was the VW plant at Wolfsburg that was wasted building campstoves and foot warmers (less than 1/5th utilization). As for Opel, the Nazi's and the German military first wanted to break it up (Hitler didn't like Opel because they offered a competing model to his "dream car", the VW). Opel's plants were barely used before 1942, and half the workforce was dispersed. Source is Overy's WHY THE ALLIES WON.

2. Can you reference this information? Opel build the famous Blitz 3-ton truck throughout the war, although I don't know in which factories.

(in reply to VSWG)

Post #: 67

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/28/2007 10:28:12 PM

VSWG

Posts: 3432
Joined: 5/31/2006
From: Germany
Status: offline

Yes, that's in line with what I know about the German war industry (not much).

_____________________________

(in reply to Mike Scholl)

Post #: 68

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/28/2007 11:03:17 PM

mdiehl

Posts: 5998
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

I've been watching it as time permitted. The narrative seems "slow" because much of it focuses on the home front. I'd say the accuracy is very good, but since much of the narrative features interviews with veterans, who are sharing recollections, experiences, and statements of how it all looked and felt, much of it is subjective. That's a good thing mind you. Most of anyone who cares to watch it at all has already, probably, a general knowledge of the sequence of events.

I have found it to be quite interesting.

Not overly politically correct. The only obvious instance of PC was in the half-hour extension on the first episode in which there is a segway to a Mexican American veteran. As I recall, Burns was pressured into adding a special emphasis on Hispanics.

_____________________________

Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?

(in reply to TommyG)

Post #: 69

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/28/2007 11:38:06 PM

Bearcat2

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

Someone forgot to tell the US Army[not to mention Bomber cmd] as they shelled the plant with artillery; the major reason it was not targeted was that it was insignificant to the war production of Germany, other Ford plants, ex; in Hungary and Rumania were targeted and Ford was compensated for their destruction after the war.
The Ford plant submitted claims of 12million RM to the German govt for bomb damages during the period 1942-45, while the main factory was not hit, some of it's other buildings were.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
The Ford factory in Cologne (completed in 1930) continued to build trucks for the Wehrmacht until 1945. Only 2 bombs fell on it during the war. Why? Because officially it was still US property, so the United States Strategic Bombing Survey made sure that it would not be destroyed...

< Message edited by Termite2 -- 9/28/2007 11:41:05 PM >

(in reply to VSWG)

Post #: 70

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 6:15:24 PM

Joe D.

Posts: 4004
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Stratford, Connecticut
Status: offline

Is it just my local cable provider, or has anyone else noticed the increased amount of WW II shows run by rival TV stations during the PBS Ken Burns documentary this week?

AMC has been showing The Longest Day and Midway over and over again, and Turner broadcasting just premiered the movie re the raid led by Col. Henry Mucci -- whom we named a section of Route 8 after here in CT -- on an IJ POW camp in the Phillipines.

And now that I'm almost done reading Shattered Sword, it's getting harder to watch Midway w/o shaking my head.

_____________________________

Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.

"The Angel of Okinawa"

Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II

(in reply to TommyG)

Post #: 71

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 6:23:36 PM

Big B

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TommyG

Did anyone watch this highly touted thing? I got bored after 10 minutes and turned back to football. It seemed slow, politically correct, and not terribly accurate. But, I didn't give it much of a chance. What say you all?

Nope, and with Ken Burns I would be not surprised at your comments.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andvari

Yes, it is slow, but what did you think was inaccurate?

As to being politically correct, are you saying the internment camps and racism in the U.S. isn't relevant to a program about WWII? Should that part be skipped?
...

(in reply to Andvari)

Post #: 72

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 7:06:18 PM

Mike Scholl

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B
As to being politically correct, are you saying the internment camps and racism in the U.S. isn't relevant to a program about WWII? Should that part be skipped?
...

Quite simply - Yes.
If you want a documentary on WWII, fine. If you want yet another stinging condemnation of our civilization - fine, but advertise it as such.
My point of view is that not every documentary is obligated to dwell upon 'social injustices'. Would a study of Wellington in the Peninsula Campaign have to include social injustices that England committed upon the Irish, or Indians in India, or the class system? To me it's the same.

Well.., you're wrong. The English "class system" and the "Irish Problem" were there before Napoleon and after him..., so they really don't need to be considered in a study of the Penninsular Campaign. US participation in WW II was the direct cause of Japanese Internment; and the dislocation and migration of workers and their families taking jobs in War Industries resulted in many "social problems" being brought into the "light" as well. So they have a place in Burns' program---which never claimed to be a strictly military history of WW II. Sweeping these facts "under the rug" would have been ignoring the truth of the matter..., something we find irritating in the Japanese.

Could it have been delt with differently, or in a less "PC" manner? Certainly.., and from my perspective more entertainingly. But it couldn't be ignored and still be an "American perspective and memory of WW II".

(in reply to Big B)

Post #: 73

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 7:55:42 PM

Big B

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B

quote:

As to being politically correct, are you saying the internment camps and racism in the U.S. isn't relevant to a program about WWII? Should that part be skipped?
...

Quite simply - Yes.
If you want a documentary on WWII, fine. If you want yet another stinging condemnation of our civilization - fine, but advertise it as such.
My point of view is that not every documentary is obligated to dwell upon 'social injustices'. Would a study of Wellington in the Peninsula Campaign have to include social injustices that England committed upon the Irish, or Indians in India, or the class No, system? To me it's the same.

Well.., you're wrong. The English "class system" and the "Irish Problem" were there before Napoleon and after him..., so they really don't need to be considered in a study of the Penninsular Campaign. US participation in WW II was the direct cause of Japanese Internment; and the dislocation and migration of workers and their families taking jobs in War Industries resulted in many "social problems" being brought into the "light" as well. So they have a place in Burns' program---which never claimed to be a strictly military history of WW II. Sweeping these facts "under the rug" would have been ignoring the truth of the matter..., something we find irritating in the Japanese.

Could it have been delt with differently, or in a less "PC" manner? Certainly.., and from my perspective more entertainingly. But it couldn't be ignored and still be an "American perspective and memory of WW II".

No, I don't think it's a matter of sweeping facts under the rug, it's merely the deconstrunctionist attitude of typical Ken Burns documentaries.
As far as I see, it's a matter of relativism. If it is mandatory to unearth all sins, so no one feels too good about themselves, then for balance - EVERY sin committed by ALL sides must be equally covered so one can put things in perspective and understand Everyones feelings. Every single accusation Japanese treachery from the Philippines to California should be accounted for and proven or disproved. Treatment of all conquered peoples by Imperial Japan must be diligently cataloged so the viewer my understand the basis of America's paranoia at the time. It should be brought out that Japanese religion mandated that the Japanese Emperor IS God on Earth and commands 1st loyalty to all good Japanese - further adding fuel to the fires of suspicion. It should be documented that many Japanese Americans refused to take a loyalty oath at the time (look up 1942 issues of the Los Angeles Times). Then a thorough accounting of all interments of enemy aliens during the war should be presented so that the viewer understands the Government was looking at everyone they deemed a potential threat at the time, especially with all the critical industry on the West Coast.
It would also help to show that Japanese Americans were enlisted in the Armed Forces during the war and gave good service, and that they were honored by America - at that time. So that early war jitters may be put into perspective.

To fail to do this leaves the impression that Americans were a bunch of boorish bigots...which I believe IS the intent of certain quarters of society today. http://www.foitimes.com/internment/fallon2.htm
http://www.internmentarchives.com/intro.php

My POV anyway.

< Message edited by Big B -- 10/2/2007 10:29:04 PM >

(in reply to Mike Scholl)

Post #: 74

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 9:14:54 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Certainly injustices were done to many Japanese-Americans and others (I am particularly unhappy over the various property seizures, both official and unofficial). Even still, political correctness is almost always way light on correct and way heavy on politics.

BigB,

Thanks for that link, very informative. Also find your perspective on the history quite logical and fair.

(in reply to Big B)

Post #: 75

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 9:35:09 PM

Mike Scholl

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B

quote:

As to being politically correct, are you saying the internment camps and racism in the U.S. isn't relevant to a program about WWII? Should that part be skipped?
...

Quite simply - Yes.
If you want a documentary on WWII, fine. If you want yet another stinging condemnation of our civilization - fine, but advertise it as such.
My point of view is that not every documentary is obligated to dwell upon 'social injustices'. Would a study of Wellington in the Peninsula Campaign have to include social injustices that England committed upon the Irish, or Indians in India, or the class No, system? To me it's the same.

Well.., you're wrong. The English "class system" and the "Irish Problem" were there before Napoleon and after him..., so they really don't need to be considered in a study of the Penninsular Campaign. US participation in WW II was the direct cause of Japanese Internment; and the dislocation and migration of workers and their families taking jobs in War Industries resulted in many "social problems" being brought into the "light" as well. So they have a place in Burns' program---which never claimed to be a strictly military history of WW II. Sweeping these facts "under the rug" would have been ignoring the truth of the matter..., something we find irritating in the Japanese.

Could it have been delt with differently, or in a less "PC" manner? Certainly.., and from my perspective more entertainingly. But it couldn't be ignored and still be an "American perspective and memory of WW II".

No, I don't think it's a matter of sweeping facts under the rug, it's merely the deconstrunctionist attitude of typical Ken Burns documentaries.
As far as I see, it's a matter of relativism. If it is mandatory to unearth all sins, so no one feels too good about themselves, then for balance - EVERY sin committed by ALL sides must be equally covered so one can put things in perspective and understand Everyones feelings. Every single accusation Japanese treachery from the Philippines to California should be accounted for and proven or disproved. Treatment of all conquered peoples by Imperial Japan must be diligently cataloged so the viewer my understand the basis of America's paranoia at the time. It should be brought out that Japanese religion mandated that the Japanese Emperor IS God on Earth and commands 1st loyalty to all good Japanese - further adding fuel to the fires of suspicion. It should be documented that many Japanese Americans refused to take a loyalty oath at the time (look up 1942 issues of the Los Angeles Times). Then a thorough accounting of all interments of enemy aliens during the war should be presented so that the viewer understands the Government was looking at everyone they deemed a potential threat at the time, especially with all the critical industry on the West Coast.
It would also help to show that Japanese Americans were enlisted in the Armed Forces during the war and gave good service, and that they were honored by America - at that time. So that early war jitters may be put into perspective.
My POV anyway.

I understand your POV, and agree with much of the above. Burns does tend to get wrapped up with the "hand-wringer" crowd and ignore some of the reasons why many Americans were paranoid at the time. But the "bigotry was there as well. Ask the black workers in Mobile and elsewhere. As for the Japanese and their criminal and inhuman acts, maybe someone will do a similar "documentary" on the Japanese experiance in WW II someday. I wish he had gone into it..., but can't fault him because he didn't as that really wasn't his subject matter. I don't want to end up "defending" Ken Burns as I find a lot to fault him for as well. I just didn't feel he was "guilty" as you charged because he never claimed that was his goal.

(in reply to Big B)

Post #: 76

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 9/30/2007 10:35:04 PM

Joe D.

Posts: 4004
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Stratford, Connecticut
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Big B
... If you want yet another stinging condemnation of our civilization - fine, but advertise it as such ...

I think the History Channel was more open and even-handed re race and injustice in America in its documentary on Gen. Sherman and his "march to the sea"; almost anything PBS presents leans left of center.

_____________________________

Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.

"The Angel of Okinawa"

Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II

(in reply to Big B)

Post #: 77

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/1/2007 1:12:37 AM

Big B

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline

Well, If I could tell Ken Burns directly, I'd say:

SHOUT!
Shout,
Let it all out,
These are the things I can do without,
Come on,
I�m talking to you,
Come on -
(repeat)

In violent times,
You shouldn�t have to sell your soul,
In black and white,
They really, really ought to know,
Those one track minds,
That took you for a working boy,
Kiss them goodbye,
You shouldn�t have to jump for joy,
You shouldn�t have to jump for joy -

Shout
Shout,
Let it all out,
These are the things I can do without,
Come on,
I�m talking to you,
Come on -

They gave you life,
And in return you gave them hell,
As cold as ice,
I hope we live to tell the tale,
I hope we live to tell the tale -

Shout,
Shout,
Let it all out,
These are the things I can do without,
Come on -
I�m talking to you,
Come on -

Shout,
Shout,
Let it all out,
These are the things I can do without,
Come on -
I�m talking to you,
Come on -

And when - you�ve taken down your guard,
If I could change your mind,
I�d really love to break your heart,
I�d really love to break your heart -

Shout,
Shout,
Let it all out -
These are the things I can do without,
So, come on,
I�m talking to you,
Come on -
(repeat 4 times)

Everybody wants to rule the world.....

< Message edited by Big B -- 10/1/2007 1:48:46 AM >

(in reply to Joe D.)

Post #: 78

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/2/2007 12:15:17 AM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

The camps came about as a result of fear and hysteria as much as anything else.

However, in 1941 the US was rampant with racism, and there is plenty of historical evidence of American racism against the Japanese-ever since they arrived in the 1800s to help work on the railroads. Racism had to be a factor with any policy decisions and was a factor all throughout the war. One only needs to look at the allied propaganda posters aimed at the Japanese.

That said, Japan was and still is today to some effect a highly racist society. They did not treat foreigners too nicely. Perhaps we have a long way to go but at least there is a sense today in the US that the Japanese-Americans did not get a fair deal. The Japanese themselves as a people have had quite a bit of difficulty coming to terms with their own war policies. Nobody was wrong. It was war and war is a preversion on any society.

"War is cruelty and you cannot refine it"

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to panda124c)

Post #: 79

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/2/2007 1:17:23 AM

AW1Steve

Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

The camps came about as a result of fear and hysteria as much as anything else.

However, in 1941 the US was rampant with racism, and there is plenty of historical evidence of American racism against the Japanese-ever since they arrived in the 1800s to help work on the railroads. Racism had to be a factor with any policy decisions�and�was a factor all�throughout the war. One only needs to look at�the allied�propaganda posters aimed at the Japanese.

That said, Japan was and still is today�to some effect a highly racist society. They did not treat foreigners too nicely.� Perhaps we have a long way to go but at least there is a sense today in the US that the Japanese-Americans did not get a fair deal. The Japanese themselves as a people have had quite a bit of difficulty coming to terms with their own war policies. Nobody was wrong. It was war and war is a preversion on any society.

"War is cruelty and you cannot refine it"

Yeah , anyone who's visited can tell you about the "no forgeigners" signs on the doors of some restruraunts and shops.

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 80

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/3/2007 12:43:45 AM

mikemike

Posts: 501
Joined: 6/3/2004
From: a maze of twisty little passages, all different
Status: offline

Are you sure about this?

I am 99% certain that I read that US build factories were very very little used in WWII by germany (German trucks were strange mixture of all kinds of models - that was really big problem for logistics and supply and it was never solded in war).

Leo "Apollo11"
[/quote]

What you say about German truck production is correct in general, which is why Hitler was so anxious to get modern truck plants built by US companies. Opel (GM) built a giant, state-of-the-art truck plant in Brandenburg, close to Berlin, that built the Opel Blitz 3-ton truck, which became the standard 3-ton truck for the Wehrmacht. Opel built about 100.000 of them during the war, and more were licence-built by other companies. One source puts the total at about 400.000. Just google for "opel blitz". It is true that the main Opel plant in R�sselsheim was only reluctantly used for war production, at least as long as it was still controlled from the US, but eventually the R�sselsheim plant produced parts of the Ju 88.

Ford built a truck assembly plant in Berlin whose "real purpose," according to U.S. Army Intelligence, was producing "troop transport-type" vehicles for the Wehrmacht. The French Ford plant in Poissy was converted to truck production during the war, delivering 20 trucks per day to the Wehrmacht. Ford Germany produced vehicles for the Wehrmacht, but also other military products, including the turbo pumps for the V2 rocket engine.

GM and Ford subsidiaries built more than 70 percent of the Reich's medium and heavy-duty trucks. These vehicles, according to American intelligence reports, served as "the backbone of the German Army transportation system."

The Volkswagen plant in Wolfsburg has also been mentioned in this thread. It was not finished when the war broke out, but produced about 50.000 K�belwagen and about 15.000 Schwimmwagen (amphibious cars). Not just cookers.

A US-owned car body plant in Berlin, Ambi-Budd, produced the outher shell for the G7e electric torpedo. I think they were also involved in V2 production.

_____________________________

DON�T PANIC - IT�S ALL JUST ONES AND ZEROES!

(in reply to Apollo11)

Post #: 81

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/3/2007 1:27:06 AM

Andvari

Posts: 91
Joined: 9/7/2006
Status: offline

I hardly see this program as, "yet another stinging condemnation of our civilization", i.e. Liberal Media bias, and I don't see this as Burn's goal. As I said in my original post, if you just want the battles without all that other "unnecessary" and "irrelevant" facts like what the people at home had to deal with, or civilian casualties on both sides, or the hypocrisy inherent in all wars, then watch the History Channel or read a book--then you can skip those things that don't promote your own self-righteous view of the world.

Burn's said he couldn't tell all the stories, but he wanted to tell some because he knew so many of the veterans of WWII wouldn't be around much longer, thus this is largely an anecdotal history with some pretty good footage of the "big events." Some of the stories are boring or silly, but many--most are compelling. Since all of my family's veterans of WWII are now dead, I'm more than happy to listen to those that will share their experiences.

(in reply to AW1Steve)

Post #: 82

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/3/2007 7:19:09 AM

Grotius

Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline

I have only seen a little bit of "The War" so far, but my initial impression is the same as Andvari's. It seems like a very useful oral history. Maybe not as exciting for me to watch as something focused solely on combat footage, but educational and interesting all the same.

(in reply to Andvari)

Post #: 83

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 1:48:32 AM

JWE

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

I'm with BigB on this one.

I am quite tired of �isms�. �Isms� are constructs of people who cannot accept the realities of everyday life and who must render simple, individual, human emotions and responses into some sort of great and meaningful global intellectual, political dialectic.

What we all forget, sometimes, is that we, the US of A, are different; well we were and certainly can be again if we don�t forget our founding truths. This nation was founded on the principle of individual rights and freedoms: In a perfect world, this means a man or woman may aspire to any heights they may contemplate, regardless of their color, creed, or national origin. We have no lords, we have no peons; our Constitution recognizes no dysfunction of birth. Any individual may grasp as high as their reach.

Nations, particularly our nation, are made up of individuals, and individuals have and exhibit those peculiarities of ignorance and bigotry that are endemic to individuals everywhere. As we moved from a Republic to a Democracy, these democratic tendencies became more nationally prevalent. This does not mean the nation became more bigoted, just that the inherent bigotry of the �demos� became more apparent and was reflected in our national political life.

All these media and politico pukes, don�t get it. They want us to be just like an extension of the Euro 19th century progression and act like the 20th century grandchild of the Victorian worldview. They went to Yale and Harvard and thought themselves equivalent to the Euros in world politics; but they just didn�t want to understand that we are different.

I am an American and, thus, a bit different, and so are you. I have fast friends that are black/brown. One of my friends and top 5 sailboat racing crew members is Joseph Olongo (blacker that this text and from South Africa). I see Barak Obama as an extremely intelligent and articulate (and well worth listening to) spokesman for a particular philosophy (not my philosophy, but a valid one nevertheless: BTW did I mention he�s black?). My gardener is brown, and illegal, but when has that stopped us from sharing a Cervesa and watching a sunset and talking about our children? Riaz is from Syria and makes the best rotisserie chicken in SoCal; he likes football (soccer) and we�ve had many conversations about the Brazilians and Mohamed, and life-the-universe-and-everything.

Given that, I gotta say that I have a loaded 10 Ga and 9mm that I am not afraid to use on any black gangbanger, whacko Muslim extremist, or Aztlan homeland activist that wants to pay me a visit. Am I a racist? No, I am a simple bigot.

Racism is a horror: a global horror that should be dealt with by the entire weight of the military establishments of the civilized world. Racism is not something that should be passed back & forth at cocktail parties on the Potomac.

The only people who truly discuss racism, in these days, are people who work in Africa, or those who work with the survivors of the Holocaust. Bigotry can be confounded by education and personal interaction. Racism can be confounded by judicious application of nuclear weapons.

Yes, I am a bigot, perhaps. But if you call me a racist, I will protest. I am an American, and believe in our founding principles; I am almost 60 years old, but no matter who you are, I will face you, slap your jaws and force you to resent it.

< Message edited by JWE -- 10/5/2007 1:56:54 AM >

(in reply to Big B)

Post #: 84

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 2:19:25 AM

Mike Scholl

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

Gotta agree with a lot of what JWE says..., though I see it from a different perspective. I worked with a fairly multi-cultural mix, and now that I'm retired on a fairly fixed income, I live with a very multicolored and multiracial mix of folks. Most of them are great...

I don't think of myself as a racist..., but I'm definately a "SCUM-ist". "Scum" is easy to spot. Somewhere in every paragraph they speak is a version of "you owe me"..., and nothing is ever their fault. I will freely admit I don't like these folks one bit.

(in reply to JWE)

Post #: 85

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 3:55:20 AM

Rainer

Posts: 1210
Joined: 11/21/2000
From: Neuching, Bavaria, Germany
Status: offline

quote:

Racism can be confounded by judicious application of nuclear weapons.

I do not believe this. I do believe this is a false and dangerous statement. Sorry.

< Message edited by Rainer -- 10/5/2007 4:05:23 AM >

(in reply to JWE)

Post #: 86

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 4:05:55 AM

JWE

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline

quote:

Rainer

I do not believe this. I do believe this is a false and dangerous statement. Sorry.
[quote\]

OK, perhaps that was a bit hyperbolic, but true racism is even more dangerous. In a real multi-cultural world, you can kick the bigot in the butt, and hope he learns better. In a racist world ....

< Message edited by JWE -- 10/5/2007 4:11:00 AM >

(in reply to Mike Scholl)

Post #: 87

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 6:17:55 AM

TOMLABEL

Posts: 5116
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Alabama - ROLL TIDE!!!!!
Status: offline

Very nicely said, JWE. Especially this.

quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

I am quite tired of �isms�. �Isms� are constructs of people who cannot accept the realities of everyday life and who must render simple, individual, human emotions and responses into some sort of great and meaningful global intellectual, political dialectic.

_____________________________

Art by the Rogue-USMC

WITP Admiral's Edition: Ship & Sub Art/Base Unit Art/Map Icon Art

"If destruction be our lot - it will come from within"...Abraham Lincoln

(in reply to JWE)

Post #: 88

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 7:30:05 AM

Snowman999

Posts: 90
Joined: 4/11/2007
Status: offline

quote:

It would also help to show that Japanese Americans were enlisted in the Armed Forces during the war and gave good service, and that they were honored by America - at that time. So that early war jitters may be put into perspective.

Burns did this. In fact, roughly two of the fifteen hours involved this very topic, with extensive interviews of veterans, including a long-serving US Senator who was not identified that way. He was labeled simply as a citizen.

All of which you'd know if you'd watched the show you're bashing.

Steve

(in reply to Big B)

Post #: 89

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2 - 10/5/2007 2:50:18 PM

AW1Steve

Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rainer

quote:

Racism can be confounded by judicious application of nuclear weapons.

I do not believe this. I do believe this is a false and dangerous statement. Sorry.

Actually , almost any problem can be solved by judicious application of nuclear weapons.

(in reply to Rainer)

Post #: 90

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

1.141

Slitherine

RE: OT- Ken Burns WW2