Canoerebel
Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002 From: Northwestern Georgia, USA Status: offline
|
6/7/43 to 6/10/43 Battle of the Maldives: The RN rounded the southern tip of India on the 8th and ended up five hexes from the Jap Mini-KB, which apparently was moving south. Both forces reacted and ended up just three hexes apart, but failed to launch. A similar dance occurred on the 9th, with both forces moving eastward a few hexes, but no aircraft taking flight. Finally, on the 10th, both sides launched. The Brits have 3 CVs and a CVL and the Japs apparently have CVs Hiyo and Junyo and CVL Shoho. A large strike force of Seafires, SeaHurricanes, Avengers and Albacores scored three torpedo hits on Hiyo and one on Junyo (no fires reported on the latter, however). The Japs launched a large strike followed by a few smaller ones, but failed to penetrate the Seafire and SeaHurricane CAP augmented by 7 P-38s flying LRCAP from Trivandrum and/or Colombo. Liberator IIIs from Colombo flew strike missions but failed to locate the enemy TFs. For the day, the Japs lost 113 aircraft to a-2-a, while the Allies lost 18. Tomorrow: The RN CVs will continue on a SE heading, hoping to launch more missions against the Jap ships. I have the angle (my ships are slightly ahead) and I think I may be able to trap the Japs or at least hit thim a few more times before I run low on sorties. I presume Hiyo is mortally wounded and I think I may have a chance at the other two. That would be a great victory. Burma: On the 7th, Liberator IIIs hit a Jap transport convoy in the Bay of Bengal, damaging four APs. Nothing new at Rangoon or Moulmein. China: Steady progress reported in the attacks against 104th Division at Kweiyang. CenPac: Jap combat ships sighted SW of Jarvis Island. It's possible that's a carrier TF coming to "smell out" the Allied defenses in the area, so I sent the US CVs on a SE heading from Pearl Harbor "just in case." I think John may be pulling some units out of Midway. This would be a logical Jap move, but it really worries me because it would indicate that John is thinking defensively. Marcus Island went to a level three airfield, more bad news. Operation Red Planet: If the Allies can knock out a few Jap CVs in the Indian Ocean, that might allow me to move up this operation. There are many reasons to move as soon as possible. I had previously committed to waiting until August to await all the carrier reinforcements, but it John is short some, that would allow me to move a little sooner. I'll mull it over. Allied P-38 LRCAP over CVs Gamey?: Before our carrier battle, John said he considers it gamey to use LBA for LRCAP over carriers. I disagree. Here's our back and forth in emails. Me: Big surprises for me - I didn't expect you to move there, and I certainly expected a carrier battle after our ships reacted. If you were looking for a battle, we should get one this turn. If you decided to move on, I think you'll get away safely. John: My CV TF sat in that hex for FIVE days hoping to find a convoy before I was ever spotted! I was within 5 hexes again but didn't launch. My hunch is that you are playing the Allied game of placing as many LBA fighters over your CVs as possible. You want to fight? I am more then willing! Come away from the continent for it to be fair... Me: I had spotted you many turns earlier - got a recon sighting as you passed the Maldives. I just wasn't sure how powerful a fleet it was. I'll be glad to agree to a no-LBA carrier battle rule as long as it applies to both Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean.... John: Just so you know, I NEVER CAP my CVs with anything other then Naval Airpower. Have always felt it gamey to do something that never happened within the war. My CVs fight on their own! I think we are pretty evenly matched. You have either 2 CV and 1 CVL or 3 CV. It'll be interesting. I had no idea that you spotted me so early. My darned radar must have been on the firtz! :> Me: Hmmm, under that definition of gamey, you wouldn't invade Australia. John: That wasn't an invasion of Australia. We have a slight misunderstanding here. It was simply a very large sight-seeing party on a goodwill tour of the countryside! Me: Please tell the visitors that they have overstayed their welcome. John: The problem is that they weren't welcomed whatsoever. It really put them into a funk and got them VERY depressed! Me: [no comment in this email, in which I was sending the turn that resulted in the battle] John: As said I will never, EVER place LBA over my CVs. Me: I don't understand the rationale behind that, but I know you feel strongly about it since you've mentioned it several times. Last night you said you wouldn't do it because it didn't happen. Neither did a Japanese invasion of Australia happen, nor many other things that have happened already or that will happen in the future. You've told me you took units from China to explore what might have been possible had the Jap navy and army operated better. IE, you did something that makes sense, and that was possible, even though it didn't happen historically. It's the same with LBA CAP over carriers. Assuming it didn't happen historically (I have no idea and wasn't aware that there was anything unusual until you brought it up last night), it certainly was possible. In the same way you're exploring a what if by moving units from China, or invading Australia, or whatever, I guess I'm exploring the possibility that LBA cooperated fully with the navy.
< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/30/2008 8:29:54 PM >
|