Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The B.S. Power of CD

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> RE: The B.S. Power of CD Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/2/2007 11:18:53 PM   
Panther Bait


Posts: 654
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy


thought the Wehrmacht had better guns


I'm not the data guru that others here are, but I can tell ya Germany had some of the best direct fire weapons of the war.

However the U.S. had the edge in indirect fire, stemming all the way back to the end of the Civil War and leading all the way through today


I'd agree. Germany's indirect weapons were mostly mostly remakes of World War I artillery pieces, which were re-designed and first produced in the early to mid-30's, and I believe most of the re-design was in the carriages to take advantage of better available materials. I believe Germany was one of the first armies to use widespread organic gun artillery (75mm and up) at the sub-regiment level, though.

With the US's delayed entry to the war and lack of armament buildup until the very end, much of their artillery was designed/re-designed in the very late-30's/early 40's. The US also had excellent indirect ammunition, some of the best in the world.

Another huge advantage of the US was that all of its artillery was self-propelled or motorized. Germany had self-propelled artillery, but never enough. And it's towed artillery was typically horse-drawn.

I am not sure of the quality of the Russian artillery, but they sure had a lot of it!!!

_____________________________

When you shoot at a destroyer and miss, it's like hit'in a wildcat in the ass with a banjo.

Nathan Dogan, USS Gurnard

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 31
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/2/2007 11:49:23 PM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline 		Russian artillery generally had shorter range for the caliber than German or American artillery.  I believe their accuracy was also not as good.  They over came the lack of quality with quantity.

The US not only had the benefit of all motorized artillery, but also had the luxury of plentiful ammunition most of the time.  When possible, US doctrine was to pummel the enemy with stand off weapons then accept his surrender.

Bill


_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to Panther Bait)
Post #: 32
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 1:01:05 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline
Well...since the thread is hijacked.....

The US also had the best communications system in place for calling indirect quickly. Lots of radios with front line, low-level officers who were trained how to request FFEs.

Russian artillery, like much of their war machine, was based on "quantity had a quality all its own".

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 33
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 1:47:52 AM   
Nightcrawler1

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Two days is still too long to be unloading.


What? Yikes! I've been doing it all wrong then. It takes my invasion forces an eternity to unload. Say, A week? Maybe more? I just thought that's the way it was.

Is there a rule of thumb so I can figure out how much transport I should have in an invasion?

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 34
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 3:01:17 AM   
rtrapasso


Posts: 22653
Joined: 9/3/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nightcrawler1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Two days is still too long to be unloading.


What? Yikes! I've been doing it all wrong then. It takes my invasion forces an eternity to unload. Say, A week? Maybe more? I just thought that's the way it was.

Is there a rule of thumb so I can figure out how much transport I should have in an invasion?



Yes - there was just a thread about this YESTERDAY, iirc - number of vessels needed is (LOAD FACTOR)/400

EDIT: This allows you to unload your troops in 2 phases (1 day). You need to have additional vessels for supplies.

This information was seen yesterday in the source of all knowledge: The THREAD!

< Message edited by rtrapasso -- 11/3/2007 3:12:23 AM >

(in reply to Nightcrawler1)
Post #: 35
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 3:21:34 AM   
Nightcrawler1

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/27/2004
Status: offline 		Oh, that The Thread thing.  I never knew what that was all about so I just ignored it.  I guess I'll have to delve in.

Of course, that info is probably in half a dozen other threads too if I had just done a search.  Thanks.

(in reply to rtrapasso)
Post #: 36
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 3:24:14 AM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline 		You cant stop an invasion with out infantry defending.  Most CD units have only a marginal defense strength (if at all).  If you're stopped on the beach and losing guys it's because he as an INF unit there, not because of the CD unit.

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 37
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 3:45:43 AM   
ctangus


Posts: 2153
Joined: 10/13/2005
From: Boston, Mass.
Status: offline 		Against an atoll you certainly want to unload all your troops in one day. Multiple shock attacks without resting can gut your combat units. It's not quite as important against a non-atoll base, but it still helps.

I did some testing on this recently, since I'm currently on the offensive in 3 games. The testing probably could have been more thorough, but here's what I've concluded so far:

1. Troops, if they're in the lowest-numbered task force, will unload 1000 load points in the first day. For example a typical Marine division requires @24,000 AP load points or 35,000 LST load points. To ensure it unloads fully in a day you'll need to load it on 24+ APs or 35+ LSTs.

2. Troops, if they're in an additional (higher-numbered) task force unloading at the same time, mostly obey the same rules, but not always. I didn't do enough testing to isolate why, but TF #2 (or #3) doesn't always completely unload. It seems to unload 80-90% of its troops. To be safe add an extra 25% margin. So for the Marine Div example above you'd want to load it onto 30 APs or 44 LSTs.

3. Supplies unload at 200 points/phase or 400 points/day. However on an initial invasion supplies don't seem to unload during the first phase. On D-Day you get only 200 supply points per AK dedicated solely to supply transport.

Let's take that Marine Division again for example. At rest it might have a supply requirement of 1200. Combat doubles requirements so it will need 2400 supply for combat. To give it 2400 supply in one day of unloading you need 12 AKs solely dedicated to carrying supply.

I hope this makes some sense. It might seem like a lot of shipping - heck might be overkill - but I've had several successes & no failures applying these rules of thumb.

(in reply to rtrapasso)
Post #: 38
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 3:59:25 AM   
rtrapasso


Posts: 22653
Joined: 9/3/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

You cant stop an invasion with out infantry defending.  Most CD units have only a marginal defense strength (if at all).  If you're stopped on the beach and losing guys it's because he as an INF unit there, not because of the CD unit.

-F-


The 7th USMC CD (which he said is opposing him) has 6 x 5" guns, 12 x 3 in AA guns, 12 x .50 cal MG, 12 x .303 MGs, 12 x USMC squads, and 60 support squads. Not sure what FA regiment is involved - possibly it has infantry, but i doubt it has much. The Base force could have considerable infantry with it...

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 39
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 4:15:12 AM   
Nightcrawler1

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/27/2004
Status: offline 		In the time it took to find the answer on The THREAD, I got a more detailed answer here. Thanks ctangus.

I did get hypnotized by the shadow of a spinning dancer while I was there though, so that took extra time.


< Message edited by Nightcrawler1 -- 11/3/2007 4:25:04 AM >

(in reply to rtrapasso)
Post #: 40
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 4:47:02 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline
The Thread will lead you to the promised land. Hypnotic it is.

(in reply to Nightcrawler1)
Post #: 41
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 9:48:44 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Let me continue the pain of Pago-Pago.  With all this GREAT advice, I decided to land the 14th Brigade from China to augment the Infantry Division holding on by its fingernails.  On February 15, 1942, they go in to land.  I have enough AP to land them IN ONE LANDING with supplies.  There are several warships there to help with counter-bombardment.

What happens???

THEY ARE WIPED OUT!  I lose the entire unit BY ATTRITION that day.  The Shock Attack gets a 0-1 and I lose the ENTIRE UNIT.  This base has now accounted for 45,000 Japanese Casualties.

I am done with this.

Now what do you have to say!??  Am rather....(&*^&_^%^H:OI Y(Y*....



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 42
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 10:36:21 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Let me continue the pain of Pago-Pago.  With all this GREAT advice, I decided to land the 14th Brigade from China to augment the Infantry Division holding on by its fingernails.  On February 15, 1942, they go in to land.  I have enough AP to land them IN ONE LANDING with supplies.  There are several warships there to help with counter-bombardment.

What happens???

THEY ARE WIPED OUT!  I lose the entire unit BY ATTRITION that day.  The Shock Attack gets a 0-1 and I lose the ENTIRE UNIT.  This base has now accounted for 45,000 Japanese Casualties.

I am done with this.

Now what do you have to say!??  Am rather....(&*^&_^%^H:OI Y(Y*....





mmmm...this sounds even stranger...how can it be possible?? one entire brigade wiped out in a single shock attack lost?? Too much! Which scenario are u playing? You're sure it's not a strange mod?...Pago pago is well defended in CHS for example...but even there these results simply do not make any sense to me

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 43
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 1:45:21 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Yaaa...I remember how those 155MM did so well during the REAL war!

Dan--You KNOW perfectly well what a China Brigade is! These guys got tired of being in smelly. cold China and changed their uniforms for Tropical attire!



Yes because noone sailed up, anchored and started unloading under their noses

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 44
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 1:47:45 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Let me continue the pain of Pago-Pago. With all this GREAT advice, I decided to land the 14th Brigade from China to augment the Infantry Division holding on by its fingernails. On February 15, 1942, they go in to land. I have enough AP to land them IN ONE LANDING with supplies. There are several warships there to help with counter-bombardment.

What happens???

THEY ARE WIPED OUT! I lose the entire unit BY ATTRITION that day. The Shock Attack gets a 0-1 and I lose the ENTIRE UNIT. This base has now accounted for 45,000 Japanese Casualties.

I am done with this.

Now what do you have to say!?? Am rather....(&*^&_^%^H:OI Y(Y*....




That indeed does sound strange. Can you post a screenshot of the combat screen and paste the combat resolution txt?

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 45
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 4:57:17 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		John III and I are playing BigB Mod 1.40 with Scenario 191. 

I'm playing this this mod against Miller.  He, too, invaded Pago Pago, but under much different conditions.  In that game, I already had about 1300 AV totally dug in (9 forts) with 200k supply and all kinds of support troops.  He landed a division, but I don't recall the landing wreaking total havoc with his ships and men.  But a single division wasn't capable of handling the garrison, of course.

In this game, it's still early in the game (around Feb. 1, '42 when John first landed).  The garrison was a BF and a CD unit (both already in place when the game starts) and a FA regiment I diverted from Suva.  There are two forts and enough supplies, but not an overabundance.  John didn't do any pre-invasion bombardments or bombings.  Shoreguns decimated the invasion transports.  I think that started a cascade of problems - the troops came ashore in a weakened state due to shore guns, the automatic shock attack faired poorly, and then smaller units began disappearing by attrition.  I don't know whether John's troops were prepped.

Had the invasion been preceeded by bombardments and bombings, the results probably would have been much different.  At least that's my guess.

(in reply to String)
Post #: 46
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 5:31:59 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

John III and I are playing BigB Mod 1.40 with Scenario 191.

I'm playing this this mod against Miller. He, too, invaded Pago Pago, but under much different conditions. In that game, I already had about 1300 AV totally dug in (9 forts) with 200k supply and all kinds of support troops. He landed a division, but I don't recall the landing wreaking total havoc with his ships and men. But a single division wasn't capable of handling the garrison, of course.

In this game, it's still early in the game (around Feb. 1, '42 when John first landed). The garrison was a BF and a CD unit (both already in place when the game starts) and a FA regiment I diverted from Suva. There are two forts and enough supplies, but not an overabundance. John didn't do any pre-invasion bombardments or bombings. Shoreguns decimated the invasion transports. I think that started a cascade of problems - the troops came ashore in a weakened state due to shore guns, the automatic shock attack faired poorly, and then smaller units began disappearing by attrition. I don't know whether John's troops were prepped.

Had the invasion been preceeded by bombardments and bombings, the results probably would have been much different. At least that's my guess.


So basically a horribly prepared and planned operation that ran into stiff opposition and was destroyed. No wonder..

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 47
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 5:45:19 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		No String.  Not true whatsoever.

The 1st Landing of a full Infantry Division and Engineering Regiment (30,000+ troops) featured them with a Prep of 55 for the base.  They landed against a force only marginally stronger then WAKE ISLAND.  Yes--there is that FA Unit but that is about the ONLY difference.

Wake usually falls when  a pair of of strong SNLF or Naval Guard units hit it.  With the Forts at 2 instead of 1, I landed with a force 5-6 times that strength.  What CRAP!  Add to that then the second Landing of 2 small base forces and an Artillery Regiment then, finally this Brigade. 

I rarely get mad at the game anymore but this is insanity.  One little garrision with, as detailed above, less then a dozen good-sized guns have managed to kill 40,000 Japanese and sink about 20 AP/AK.  I cannot believe it.  If I say anything more, this will be appropriately censored by our good webmasters...



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to String)
Post #: 48
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 7:01:28 PM   
seydlitz_slith


Posts: 2036
Joined: 6/16/2002
From: Danville, IL
Status: offline 		Now we know what island John Wayne is own in your game.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 49
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 8:30:37 PM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gen.Hoepner


Which scenario are u playing? You're sure it's not a strange mod?...


Just an FYI, in the mod he's playing Pago Pago does not start fortified or improved at all. Nor has the stats for a Field Artillery Regiment been altered in any way.

It sounds to me like some very unlucky die rolls, with misfortune compounding misfortune.

Also, remember that a FA Rgt has about the anti-ship firepower of two and half "Boise's" (36x 155's).

B

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 50
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 9:14:29 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline 		You MIGHT want to not land unsupported in the teeth of undisrupted coastal defense guns in the future.

Totally unrealistic? Look at the first invasion of Wake. That was what, 3 guns if I recall correctly? Japs learned a lesson and came back with a little more force the 2nd time. Hmmmmmmmm....

Unrealistic?

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 51
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 9:43:47 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		also, another good tactic is to change your invasion TF to "escort TF" so that the main transport force can contain BB's. BB's present in the actual landing force can greatly reduce the impact of CD's but suppressing them as well as taking some of the return fire which they can handle far better than a DD or AP.

_____________________________


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 52
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/3/2007 10:32:20 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

No String. Not true whatsoever.

The 1st Landing of a full Infantry Division and Engineering Regiment (30,000+ troops) featured them with a Prep of 55 for the base. They landed against a force only marginally stronger then WAKE ISLAND. Yes--there is that FA Unit but that is about the ONLY difference.

Wake usually falls when a pair of of strong SNLF or Naval Guard units hit it. With the Forts at 2 instead of 1, I landed with a force 5-6 times that strength. What CRAP! Add to that then the second Landing of 2 small base forces and an Artillery Regiment then, finally this Brigade.

I rarely get mad at the game anymore but this is insanity. One little garrision with, as detailed above, less then a dozen good-sized guns have managed to kill 40,000 Japanese and sink about 20 AP/AK. I cannot believe it. If I say anything more, this will be appropriately censored by our good webmasters...




As others have said, landing into a coastal defence of 40+ 5 and 6" guns with absolutely no naval gunfire support does not make for a well prepared and executed invasion.

I'm sorry but even if you suffered from bad die rolls you also screwed up yourself.

edit: Anyway, what is your excuse of landing a full division without ANY preliminary bombardment whatsoever. Neither from sea or air.

If you didn't have any carriers or surface warships available then why did you invade such a far away island in the first place, what if the allies had had a cruiser squadron lurking around, or what if the carriers were just 180 miles away, or what if they had greater forces on the island than you expected.... oh wait.

< Message edited by String -- 11/3/2007 10:37:19 PM >

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 53
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 12:44:02 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

You MIGHT want to not land unsupported in the teeth of undisrupted coastal defense guns in the future.

Totally unrealistic? Look at the first invasion of Wake. That was what, 3 guns if I recall correctly? Japs learned a lesson and came back with a little more force the 2nd time. Hmmmmmmmm....

Unrealistic?


Wake showed how poor Japan was at amphibious operations. They're successes were almost always against unprepared or non-existent defenders. Wake's defenders were prepared, but very small. A large enough force crushed them the second time.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 54
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 2:44:54 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson

Wake showed how poor Japan was at amphibious operations. They're successes were almost always against unprepared or non-existent defenders. Wake's defenders were prepared, but very small. A large enough force crushed them the second time.

Bill


I'd have to disagree with that. Wake showed what could happen when an ill prepared "2nd Team" force with inadequate resources and support tries to assault an alerted and well defended atoll. In terms of the Japanese' successes, the reason why they were against non existant or lightly defended areas was due to doctrine. The Japanese were arguably the most proficient at Amphibious "Operations" which by definition are operations designed to be conducted against lightly or undefended locales. Japan, like the UK were unenthusiastic regarding the viability of Amphibious "Assault" [The taking of moderate to heavily defended coastlines] and thus didn't develop a detailed doctrine to conduct it. Only the USMC felt it was viable and it eventually did become viable once the kinks were worked out and the tools were developed to support it. (primary advanced landing craft that could fight their way in with a decent chance of survival.)


< Message edited by Nikademus -- 11/4/2007 2:45:35 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 55
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 3:01:11 AM   
rtrapasso


Posts: 22653
Joined: 9/3/2002
Status: offline 		Even a single 75 mm unmolested artillery piece wreaked havoc on the IJ landings on Corregidor and almost caused failure of that landing. An intact artillery regiment with 155 mm guns would have been hell on any landing force without effective counterfire from ships with large caliber guns.

< Message edited by rtrapasso -- 11/4/2007 3:02:45 AM >

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 56
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 3:08:43 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		being proficient doesn't mean things can't still go wrong. I seem to recall the 1st dedicated USMC attempt at Lunga was full of enough Snafu's that it was commented that it had been a good thing the landing was unopposed.

Corregidor i wouldn't exactly consider an Amphib Op but an Assault and things did go wrong for the Japanese in spades. Despite a fierce bombardment Homma's men made a key error in not accounting for the swift current encountered and thus missed their intended landing site by more than a mile with the result that they landed in the lap of a USMC Marine Battalion which took full advantage of a rising moon to hit them with everything they had. Only 600 men of the 2000 man force scrambled ashore but they did succeed in securing the Eastern end of the island.

_____________________________


(in reply to rtrapasso)
Post #: 57
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 3:12:04 AM   
Big B

 

Posts: 4870
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: Old Los Angeles pre-1960
Status: offline 		This all may be...

But I think the original point is that John unfortunately ran into a 'buzzsaw' that wasn't adequately supressed.

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 58
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 3:14:37 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		I agree. Though the "trick" has been around for a while, i think there's still a large % of players out there who don't realize that one can finaggle the big guns of the BB into their invasion TF's which really do do wonders to suppress nasty CD's and beach facing arty.[via the "escort" TF formation] A refresh of the Atoll rules also sounded in order from what he described.



_____________________________


(in reply to Big B)
Post #: 59
RE: The B.S. Power of CD - 11/4/2007 3:31:47 AM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Panther Bait


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy




Another huge advantage of the US was that all of its artillery was self-propelled or motorized. Germany had self-propelled artillery, but never enough. And it's towed artillery was typically horse-drawn.




The figure I remember reading was that the German army was never more than 60 percent mechanized. I cannot quote a source,

(in reply to Panther Bait)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> RE: The B.S. Power of CD Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.910