Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 11:11:10 AM   
Rommel3

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
(I'm poor at english, sorry)
Many(most?) of 5in,4.7in 4in naval Gun used as DP gun. But in Witp, even in Mods disregard this.

Were those DP guns useless?
Post #: 1
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 12:17:02 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
Yes many of Japanese and British DPs were almost useless and had elevation limitations, that is the reason many are classed as naval guns. Also because the game doesnt allows for a DP range Vs Naval range.

(in reply to Rommel3)
Post #: 2
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 2:17:53 PM   
Rommel3

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.


< Message edited by Rommel3 -- 11/4/2007 2:28:10 PM >

(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 3
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 3:20:16 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.



Well, effective against what? Bigger guns fire at higher targets, light AA fires at lower targets. Generally speaking, japanese AA is horrible, with the exception of the 3.9" DP gun. The opposite is true for the allies, with a few bad models but most of the rest being quite good.

(in reply to Rommel3)
Post #: 4
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 3:27:13 PM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: String


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.



Well, effective against what? Bigger guns fire at higher targets, light AA fires at lower targets. Generally speaking, japanese AA is horrible, with the exception of the 3.9" DP gun. The opposite is true for the allies, with a few bad models but most of the rest being quite good.



You also need to consider the Fire Control. The Japanese were pretty much "look and shoot at what you see" throughout the war, while the Americans developed fire control radars fitted down to the level of the individual Quad 40mm mounts...

(in reply to String)
Post #: 5
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 3:33:24 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.



Didn't I post something on this about a year and a half ago?

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Rommel3)
Post #: 6
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 3:46:36 PM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: herwin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.



Didn't I post something on this about a year and a half ago?



More than likely...just about every aspect of the game has been discussed at some point..

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 7
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 5:10:21 PM   
Rommel3

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 6/18/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: String


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.



Well, effective against what? Bigger guns fire at higher targets, light AA fires at lower targets. Generally speaking, japanese AA is horrible, with the exception of the 3.9" DP gun. The opposite is true for the allies, with a few bad models but most of the rest being quite good.



But In the pacific naval warfare It was generally low altitude. it'snt it?
My consideration is the fact japan installed many 25mm's to DDs which had useless 5"/50 and there were small DD's which have better DP gun. So Which one is better choice for AA escort as jappan side. I know generally WW2 AA guns are not trustworthy especailly japan side. but choice is choice.

< Message edited by Rommel3 -- 11/4/2007 5:11:59 PM >

(in reply to String)
Post #: 8
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 5:48:17 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
After they get their significant ASW/AA upgrades, the old DDs make excellent CVTF escorts, as long as you don't mind refueling them every couple of days.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Rommel3)
Post #: 9
RE: Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp - 11/4/2007 10:11:34 PM   
String


Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

quote:

ORIGINAL: String


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rommel3

There are Big(jap-5"/40,USA-5/38) Small(25mm AA,20mm) AA Gun. which one is more effective? In historical term and game term

If Big one is better i gonna use more Akizuki, Matsu Class as AA escorts.



Well, effective against what? Bigger guns fire at higher targets, light AA fires at lower targets. Generally speaking, japanese AA is horrible, with the exception of the 3.9" DP gun. The opposite is true for the allies, with a few bad models but most of the rest being quite good.



But In the pacific naval warfare It was generally low altitude. it'snt it?
My consideration is the fact japan installed many 25mm's to DDs which had useless 5"/50 and there were small DD's which have better DP gun. So Which one is better choice for AA escort as jappan side. I know generally WW2 AA guns are not trustworthy especailly japan side. but choice is choice.


Best escorts for that purpose are Akizuki class. Designed with carrier escort in mind.

(in reply to Rommel3)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Disregarding naval DP guns in Witp Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.014