Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenario 160

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenario 160 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenario 160 - 11/11/2007 3:02:43 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
This is another pbem using scenario 160. The only change is J7W shinden now uses only 1 engine instead of original 2. My honorable opponent declined my offer of let Reppu and Shinden be produced one year earlier....

As first turn, Japs is allowed to make anything that they see suitable. Allies is allowed to move TF Lexinton, Enterprise, Repulse, plus 2 Asia Fleet cruisers (Marblehead command not changed).
Post #: 1
RE: THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenar... - 11/11/2007 3:04:38 PM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
Have fun on the other side of the hill mate!:-)

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 2
RE: THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenar... - 11/11/2007 4:02:18 PM   
timtom


Posts: 2358
Joined: 1/29/2003
From: Aarhus, Denmark
Status: offline
Have you checked out the RHS scn "Empire of the Sun" (RHSEOS)? Imperial Japan on steriods!

http://www.rhs.akdreemer.com/rhs_files.htm

_____________________________

Where's the Any key?


(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 3
RE: THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenar... - 11/11/2007 9:40:38 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Thank you for your encouragement, gentlemen, since I would need every bit of support in those dark opening rounds!


(in reply to timtom)
Post #: 4
Day of Infamy - 11/11/2007 10:23:59 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
7, Dec, 1941

The war begins, as usual, not rather same as in history....  (Long Live Non History Opening!!)

First come about 100 divebombers over Hongkong Harbor. Before the morning is gone all left of Royal Navy Hongkong Station are chunks of twisted metal....

==========================================================

Day Air attack on Hong Kong , at 43,42

Japanese aircraft
Ki-30 Ann x 37
Ki-51 Sonia x 24
Ki-15 Babs x 2
Ki-36 Ida x 36

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-30 Ann: 5 destroyed, 25 damaged
Ki-51 Sonia: 1 destroyed, 13 damaged
Ki-36 Ida: 4 destroyed, 15 damaged

Allied Ships
ML Redstart, Bomb hits 22,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Thanet, Bomb hits 4,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 9, Bomb hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage
DM Thracian, Bomb hits 7,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Scout, Bomb hits 4,  on fire,  heavy damage
PG Moth, Bomb hits 7,  on fire,  heavy damage
PG Cicala, Bomb hits 2,  on fire
PG Tutuila, Bomb hits 5,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 10, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 7, Bomb hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 11, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 12, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage

=============================================================

Some level bombers from Taiwan and Amoy finished the job, none of these ships could ever leave the port, I am afraid...

Day Air attack on Hong Kong , at 43,42

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-II Sally x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-II Sally: 11 damaged

Allied Ships
PG Cicala, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Thanet, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage


Day Air attack on Hong Kong , at 43,42

Japanese aircraft
C5M Babs x 2
Ki-48-I Lily x 27
Ki-46-II Dinah x 1
Ki-15 Babs x 2

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-48-I Lily: 3 destroyed, 15 damaged
Ki-46-II Dinah: 1 damaged
Ki-15 Babs: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
PG Moth, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Thanet, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Scout, Bomb hits 3,  on fire,  heavy damage
PG Tutuila, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
ML Redstart, Bomb hits 3,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 27, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DM Thracian, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
PG Cicala, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
PT MTB 11, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage


=================================================

The singapore attack is exectued as a textbook fashion

Day Air attack on Singapore , at 22,51

Japanese aircraft
G3M Nell x 75

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 20

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 4 destroyed, 67 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
BB Prince of Wales, Torpedo hits 12,  on fire,  heavy damage
PC Raub, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
CL Danae, Torpedo hits 1
CL Mauritius, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire

===========================================================

And, of course, Manila, the evil den of submarines...

Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 39
G3M Nell x 79
G4M1 Betty x 81

Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 26

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed, 3 damaged
G3M Nell: 2 destroyed, 21 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed, 7 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 9 destroyed, 8 damaged

Allied Ships
SS Skipjack, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
SS S-41, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
SS Salmon, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
SS Permit, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
SS Saury, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
SS Sargo, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Corregidor, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
SS Porpoise, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Capillo, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
AS Holland, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
SS Seadragon, Bomb hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage
SS Stingray, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
PC Genesee, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
PG Asheville, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage


Another wave comes from Vietnam...

Day Air attack on Manila , at 43,52

Japanese aircraft
G3M Nell x 49

Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M Nell: 1 destroyed, 17 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AV Langley, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
AS Canopus, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
SS Sculpin, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
SS Spearfish, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
SS Seal, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Pope, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
SS Perch, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire
AP President Madison, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire
SS Tarpon, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
AVD Childs, Bomb hits 1,  on fire

===========================================================

Now comes today's Schwerpunkt attack, the PH:

Day Air attack on Pearl Harbor , at 114,72

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 28
D3A2 Val x 99
B5N2 Kate x 115

Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 7

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A2 Val: 11 destroyed, 36 damaged
B5N2 Kate: 10 destroyed, 52 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Tomahawk: 6 destroyed
PBY Catalina: 10 destroyed
SBD-3 Dauntless: 4 destroyed
C-47 Dakota: 3 destroyed
B-18A Bolo: 4 destroyed
P-26A: 2 destroyed
B-17D Fortress: 2 destroyed
A-20B Boston: 2 destroyed
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 2 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed
P-36A Mohawk: 3 destroyed
F4F-3 Wildcat: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
BB Maryland, Bomb hits 6, Torpedo hits 1
BB Arizona, Bomb hits 7, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire
BB Oklahoma, Bomb hits 9,  on fire,  heavy damage
BB Pennsylvania, Bomb hits 11, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
BB Nevada, Bomb hits 10, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire
BB California, Bomb hits 8,  on fire
PC Reliance, Bomb hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
BB Tennessee, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire
BB West Virginia, Bomb hits 6, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DM Gamble, Bomb hits 1
AR Argonne, Bomb hits 1
AV Tangier, Bomb hits 1
CL Detroit, Torpedo hits 1
DM Pruitt, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
CL St. Louis, Bomb hits 1,  on fire
CL Honolulu, Bomb hits 1,  on fire


Allied ground losses:
71 casualties reported

Airbase hits 32
Airbase supply hits 6
Runway hits 96

This attack is done by aircrafts from 1st and 5th Carrier Division. For the reduced strength they achieved better than expectation, the airfield is not entirely shut down, however.

==============================================================
The 2nd Carrier Division moves into east of Tarakan and attacks the Marblehead TF. Poor Marble, she never stands a chance, and DD Parrot later finished by another torpedo... According our HR the Omahas are not allowed to respawn.

Day Air attack on TF at 34,62

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 11
D3A2 Val x 17
B5N2 Kate x 21

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
CL Marblehead, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 4,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Parrott, Bomb hits 3,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Bulmer

=================================================

All in all, POW is as usual, serves as wave breaker henceforth.... And I am afraid her demise from 12 torpedos should set a record.  For all you POW Fan Boys,  her survivability is definitely  better than Yamato,  which could never  withstand more than 7 torpedos...

Marblehead and 10 submarines in Manila gone too. However, the result of first day cannot be said as very good for Japanese, save the PH strike.









(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 5
RE: Day of Infamy - 11/16/2007 5:29:59 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Unfortunately my opponent follow the usual way of attacking Luzon first. IMO this is the best of way of hand over the initiative to allies as early as 1941 and in the mean time ensure the war would end before 1944...  

Hitler moved to South, instead of Moscow... He at least secured the food and other resource of Ukraine, and destroyed large amount of enemy army in a relative short time.  By moving to Luzon, you secured practically nothing, and cannot hope to destroy any amount of allies in several weeks, if not months...

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 6
Our houserule - 11/16/2007 8:50:39 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Regard to 4-e

1.No 4-engine bomb under 15000 feet, except for british 4-e squadrons (FE) ( they use a single 4000 lb bomb), this only apply to the mission of : anti-ship, airfield or port attack, ground attack, city attack

2.no B-29 under 20000

3.no B-29 anti-ship

4. bombers must be below 30,000 to prevent ueber ceiling.

Regard to strategical bombing and night bombing

4.no strategy bomb on resource under 100, and any other thing (oil, heavy industry, aircraft factory,etc) under 50

5 strategical bomb must be done by level bombers, and the altitude not below 10000, for 4-e see above.

5. no night mission except for night fighter and Patrol boat units. Any side could convert normal bomber unit to night bomber unit. To do so, these squadron first have to be announced, after this, they act as night units and cannot henceforce be given day missions and cannot be converted back.

Regard to PT, asw and AG and AK

6 PT not allowed for both sides, current PTs must be disbanded to port .

7.Allied asw group not exceed 6 ships, no restriction to japanese.

8.Any ag and ak in a port hex, so long as they are not disbanded in port, must be combined in one TF. Except those ag and ak that are loaded with troopers ( this is to prevent multiple single ak/ag tf shield the port from naval bombardement)

Regard to soviet and china and other area restriction


9.No allied units (land, naval or air) can enter soviet territory.

10. Except initial chinese exp.force, only 2 other chinese corps could be changed to southeast asia command and be able to fight in burma and india. There is no restriction to support units, however. Those 2 corps should be announced.

11.chinese forces under china command can fight in manchuria, korea,taiwan, vietnam, but not siam, burma,DEI,or india, etc.

12,Philippine could only be landed on US and local forces.

13. No allied offensive action in northern pacific before soviet enter war. They can take back any amercian territory occupied by japanese, however.

Regard to carrier aviation

14. No US corsair units on board carriers before 1, Jan, 1945. There is no restriction to British Corsair units. If Japanese ever use kamikaze before 1945, this restriction would be removed.

15. Japanese can only use those aircrafts designed for carrier, such as N1K1-J or J2M are not allowed. Submarines have only 2 aircraft to choose from. E14A Glen or M6A1

Regard to respawn

16. Only 6 carriers, 12 cruisers can be reconstructed by allied. Of these, 2 should be used to replace australian cruisers and not allowed to use on US units (NO new Zealand ships replacement). Only Heavy cruisers and american "10000-tons" light cruiser could be replaced. Those reconstruced ships should be announced before enter service.

Regard to sub-landing and air-borne

17. Only jap airborne unit and allied airbone ( regiment or below size) and raider unit could be sub-landed.

18. Any airbone unit cannot air-assualt multiple target in the same turn. One target every turn for one single unit. However, they could do that in different turns.

< Message edited by trollelite -- 11/16/2007 8:52:34 PM >

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 7
RE: Our houserule - 11/16/2007 8:54:42 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
My opponnet refused some other conceding proposed by me, or take full advantage of first non-history turn. He perhaps think me too arrogant. It's nothing to do with arrogant. My partner seems not aware Japs simply too weak. Hopefully he would realize that later.

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 8
RE: Our houserule - 11/17/2007 2:13:26 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
Hi. I think, setting the HRs, you have to consider that Japan is weak only in the long run. The objective for a japanese player is to get the autovictory in 1.1.43, or on the next stage at maximum.
Lots of restrictions to the allies won't let Japan win the war anyway. The war is won is you do better than history and the autovictory is the objective in this sense.
The best of these HR imho is the one that restrict the night bombing, which is defentely a major flaw of the game.
I have some concerns also about the strategic bombing issue...why limiting to the places which have at least 100 resources?

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 9
RE: Our houserule - 11/17/2007 2:19:56 AM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
I don't care points, as I already told you, I quit only after 6 major cities are captured. The points is no use to me, I don't care about auto victory a nickle. The HR is not to make Jap win the war, just adjust something not quite right in engine and database.

100 resource is because such things are diverse, you never entirely burn them down by bombing. Not even in vietnam war.

(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 10
RE: Our houserule - 11/17/2007 10:00:34 AM   
Gen.Hoepner


Posts: 3645
Joined: 9/4/2001
From: italy
Status: offline
I see. However i do not agree much. Resources produces far too much supply in witp and by this rule you guarantee a constant supply level to a base in which resources are present, so not forcing japan to supply it by ship-transports.
Anyway, i recognize that this doesn't change much the course of a war.

For what concerns Autovictory, points are a abstraction of how well you're doing. IMHO they're "morally" important. Let's say that the autovictory rappresents the allies forced to give up when facing the total annihilation of their forces.

_____________________________

[image]http://yfrog.com/2m70331348022314716641664j [/image]

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 11
RE: Our houserule - 11/17/2007 6:11:55 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Note on Battle of Pearl Harbor:

snip sailed his reduced KB at full speed to west after 1 day of bombing. It's wise to do so, as he may realized the not-full-out-of-action airfield still poses a threat, and the position of US carriers is unknown. Anyway, he achieved strategical target with 4 carriers, saving another two for immediate use in DEI. It's unwise to risk carrier even further for trivial target such as trying sink one or two more US battleships.

But, the presence of KB in central Pacific is still not fully utilized, it would be better if Japanese try to capture several island bases with KB's help. After these days KB definitely needed to support DEI Campaign.


(in reply to Gen.Hoepner)
Post #: 12
Note - 11/17/2007 6:17:12 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Note on deployment of IJN submarine force

The stock's default deployment is: large I type around Hawaii, serving as live training target for packs of Catalina, the medium I type support DEI campaign, the smaller Ro type patorl the south Pacific area. I would like to see how snip deploy his submarines.



(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 13
First japanese trouble - 12/10/2007 11:57:57 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
13, Dec, 1941

The war is somewhat hotter, and Japanese side begins to make blunders.

In Luzon, 16th IJA Division enters Lucena, they probably only expect an empty city, and in the end find themselves facing nearly 40,000 well-ready allies...

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 22426 troops, 105 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 503

Defending force 36129 troops, 216 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 708

Japanese max assault: 523 - adjusted assault: 76

Allied max defense: 773 - adjusted defense: 352

Japanese assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)


Japanese ground losses:
1233 casualties reported
Guns lost 12

Allied ground losses:
305 casualties reported
Guns lost 6


In Kuching, IJN bombardment TF enter the harbor before minelayer submarine O-19 could do her dirty work, so no Jap ship is mined, and they nearly knocked all coastal guns out. However, O-19 arrived just in time to ambush retreating Japanese and put a fish into destroyer Akatsuki, now with nearest level 4 harbor more than 400 sm away, this ship is in serious trouble....



(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 14
RE: First japanese trouble - 12/11/2007 12:02:00 AM   
cantona2


Posts: 3749
Joined: 5/21/2007
From: Gibraltar
Status: offline
Good luck in this one Trollelite.

EOS in RHS, as someone said above is ascen you might enjoy BTW

_____________________________

1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born


(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 15
RE: First japanese trouble - 12/14/2007 1:47:30 AM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
snip suffers another setback, when his G3Ms and B5Ns happily slaught allies MSW and ML in Balikpapan with zero escort, several dutch and british torpedo bombers slip into Tarakan and find the flagship of IJN Southern Exp. Fleet, the heavy cruiser Chokai, only defended by 3 wretched Nate! Can u believe that.....

Day Air attack on TF, near Tarakan at 34,60

Japanese aircraft
Ki-27 Nate x 3

Allied aircraft
Swordfish x 3
T.IVa x 2

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Swordfish: 3 damaged

Japanese Ships
DD Sagiri
CA Chokai, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage

And a dutch 450mm torpedo just put this ship out of action for the during of DEI campaign, if she survives at all...

Snip sailed a destroyer squadron into Malacca strait, and seems to be quite proud of that feat.... Simply crazy move...

The struggle for Balikpapan begins, IJA 35th Brigade already on shore. And Mini KB just arrived to support invasion--- without heavy cruiser or battleship support, another reckless move...

(in reply to cantona2)
Post #: 16
RE: First japanese trouble - 12/20/2007 10:53:22 PM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
Battle of Lucena:

Ground combat at Lucena

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 39841 troops, 258 guns, 135 vehicles, Assault Value = 1201

Defending force 23185 troops, 102 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 492

Allied max assault: 2460 - adjusted assault: 2075

Japanese max defense: 385 - adjusted defense: 129

Allied assault odds: 16 to 1


Japanese ground losses:
881 casualties reported
Guns lost 25

Allied ground losses:
534 casualties reported
Guns lost 24
Vehicles lost 1


IJA 16th Division, 1st Para Regeiment and Kure 1st SNLF were kicked back to Naga, and pursued by allies. Now they are at most 60% of TOE.


Naval Battle of Balikpapan:

Day Time Surface Combat, near Balikpapan at 31,64

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko, Shell hits 32,  on fire
CA Nachi, Shell hits 15, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire
DD Umikaze, Shell hits 8,  on fire,  heavy damage

Allied Ships
CA Houston, Shell hits 4
CA Exeter, Shell hits 8,  on fire
CL Java, Shell hits 3
CL De Ruyter, Shell hits 4,  on fire
CL Tromp, Shell hits 4
CL Dragon, Shell hits 1
CL Durban, Shell hits 5,  on fire
CL Boise, Shell hits 4
DD Tenedos, Shell hits 20, and is sunk
DD Vampire
DD Electra, Shell hits 2
DD Encounter, Shell hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Express, Shell hits 5,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Jupiter, Shell hits 1,  on fire
DD Banckert, Shell hits 1
DD Van Nes, Shell hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage
DD Witte de With, Shell hits 2,  on fire
DD Evertsen
DD Kortenaer
DD Piet Hein, Shell hits 2,  on fire


Day Time Surface Combat, near Balikpapan at 31,64

Japanese Ships
MSW W.13, Shell hits 6, and is sunk
MSW W.14, Shell hits 5, and is sunk

Allied Ships
BC Repulse, Shell hits 1,  on fire
DD Van Ghent

BC Repulse was hit by 2 aerial torpedos earlier (sys 22, float 44, small fire), so Japs get uphand in daytime action thanks to their superior 8 inch firepower. However, both Nachi class heavy cruisers are beyond repair in southern waters, and the Fubuki class destroyer is doomed.



(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 17
RE: First japanese trouble - 12/21/2007 2:43:05 AM   
trollelite

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 1/29/2006
Status: offline
IJN's main surface combat vessel is its heavy cruisers. All together 18 of them. However, the 4 Kakos are too weak for anything good, and would be easily overgunned by allied CA. So only 14 effective ships.  IJN still has some good battleships and an 24 knot battleline, however, they drink too much fuel oil, more than that in regard with to their combat value.

IJN 5.5'' CL are actually destroyer leaders, for they could not defeat any allies CL in a gun action, and every allies CL (including the vintage Adeleider or Sumantra) could easily gun down a entire group of them. Pity. IJN doesn't have any real light cruisers, at least not under this game engine.

(in reply to trollelite)
Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> THE RAINMAKER == trollelite(A) vs. snip (J) scenario 160 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.687