Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Some new bugs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> TOAW III Support >> Some new bugs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Some new bugs - 2/24/2008 11:19:18 AM   
Legun

 

Posts: 209
Joined: 4/22/2006
From: Cracow, Poland
Status: offline
I've found that BMP created by the option "movies on" and "create map image" have shifted hex names.
printscreen picture:


"movie on" picture:


All hex names are shifted about 2 hexes down and a little to the left.
Post #: 1
RE: Some new bugs - 2/24/2008 5:28:39 PM   
JAMiAM

 

Posts: 6165
Joined: 2/8/2004
Status: offline
Thanks for the report, Jarek.

(in reply to Legun)
Post #: 2
RE: Some new bugs - 2/24/2008 10:53:34 PM   
Legun

 

Posts: 209
Joined: 4/22/2006
From: Cracow, Poland
Status: offline
No problem - as I'm back to TOAW activity, you just can expect new massages.

There is still a time consumption bug:
My "Suwalki 1914" has MRPB set to 1 and both side shock level at 111. If there is 30-80% of a turn left, any "continue attack" result doesn't cause additional consumption of time, however it causes additional round of attack and 10% of supply consumption. This way an unit can make (or absorb) 16 rounds of attack in one turn.

(in reply to JAMiAM)
Post #: 3
RE: Some new bugs - 2/24/2008 11:01:46 PM   
Legun

 

Posts: 209
Joined: 4/22/2006
From: Cracow, Poland
Status: offline
This isn't important probably, but you could know - an unit with 3 pcs of infantry squad has mixed movement. One additional pcs changes it back to foot movement

(in reply to Legun)
Post #: 4
RE: Some new bugs - 2/24/2008 11:14:39 PM   
JAMiAM

 

Posts: 6165
Joined: 2/8/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Legun

No problem - as I'm back to TOAW activity, you just can expect new massages.

There is still a time consumption bug:
My "Suwalki 1914" has MRPB set to 1 and both side shock level at 111. If there is 30-80% of a turn left, any "continue attack" result doesn't cause additional consumption of time, however it causes additional round of attack and 10% of supply consumption. This way an unit can make (or absorb) 16 rounds of attack in one turn.

Yes, for positive shock, this is allowable. The bug fix was only to fix the effect on non-shock event timing.

(in reply to Legun)
Post #: 5
RE: Some new bugs - 2/25/2008 6:48:08 AM   
Legun

 

Posts: 209
Joined: 4/22/2006
From: Cracow, Poland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM


quote:

ORIGINAL: Legun

No problem - as I'm back to TOAW activity, you just can expect new massages.

There is still a time consumption bug:
My "Suwalki 1914" has MRPB set to 1 and both side shock level at 111. If there is 30-80% of a turn left, any "continue attack" result doesn't cause additional consumption of time, however it causes additional round of attack and 10% of supply consumption. This way an unit can make (or absorb) 16 rounds of attack in one turn.

Yes, for positive shock, this is allowable. The bug fix was only to fix the effect on non-shock event timing.

I see it as very questionable. That means, that even if I have a defending unit with supply 100, an attacker can reduce it to 1 and make 6 rounds of attack against such drained defenders .

BTW:
A correction - MRPB is set to 2. Anyway, I've never seen situation, when 2 rounds have been consumed, except 100%-80% and 20%-end.

(in reply to JAMiAM)
Post #: 6
RE: Some new bugs - 2/25/2008 7:15:53 AM   
ColinWright

 

Posts: 2604
Joined: 10/13/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Legun


quote:

ORIGINAL: JAMiAM


quote:

ORIGINAL: Legun

No problem - as I'm back to TOAW activity, you just can expect new massages.

There is still a time consumption bug:
My "Suwalki 1914" has MRPB set to 1 and both side shock level at 111. If there is 30-80% of a turn left, any "continue attack" result doesn't cause additional consumption of time, however it causes additional round of attack and 10% of supply consumption. This way an unit can make (or absorb) 16 rounds of attack in one turn.

Yes, for positive shock, this is allowable. The bug fix was only to fix the effect on non-shock event timing.

I see it as very questionable. That means, that even if I have a defending unit with supply 100, an attacker can reduce it to 1 and make 6 rounds of attack against such drained defenders .

BTW:
A correction - MRPB is set to 2. Anyway, I've never seen situation, when 2 rounds have been consumed, except 100%-80% and 20%-end.


You've probably already tried it, but how about just going with lower positive shock? After all, this is OPART III, not ACOW. Is whatever your original reason for having 111% shock still valid?


_____________________________

I am not Charlie Hebdo

(in reply to Legun)
Post #: 7
RE: Some new bugs - 2/25/2008 7:21:29 AM   
JAMiAM

 

Posts: 6165
Joined: 2/8/2004
Status: offline
Hi Jarek,

Positive shock has a count-back feature, that resets tactical rounds used. If you want to avoid this feature, then do not use positive shock in your scenarios. A shock value of 111% will cause a two-round countback. You might want to drop this to 109% to reduce the effect to only one round while still keeping most of the other shock effects that you might be looking for.

Just to be sure that we're on the same page, which version (patch) are you using?

(in reply to Legun)
Post #: 8
RE: Some new bugs - 2/25/2008 1:21:13 PM   
Legun

 

Posts: 209
Joined: 4/22/2006
From: Cracow, Poland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ColinWright
You've probably already tried it, but how about just going with lower positive shock? After all, this is OPART III, not ACOW. Is whatever your original reason for having 111% shock still valid?


In fact, the MRPB has cancelled one of the reasons I've used both side possitive shock. The second is that I wanted to minimalize risk of evaporation of attacking units (I see the idea as one of the most unrealistic TOAW features - we have discussed about it many times at TDG - the discussion seems to be lost). I'll try to lower it below 110%. Thanks JAMiAM for the suggestion.

BTW - I use the newest patch - from 09/24/2007.

The bug isn't a serius problem for my scenarios, but I was thinking that it isn't known feature.

< Message edited by Legun -- 2/25/2008 1:23:32 PM >

(in reply to ColinWright)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> TOAW III Support >> Some new bugs Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.922